Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Precise Three Dimensional Phenomenon Modeling of the Cultural Heritage based on UAS Imagery

UAS 영상기반 문화유산물의 정밀 3차원 현상 모델링

  • Lee, Yong-Chang (Department of Urban Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Kang, Joon-Oh (Department of Urban Convergence Engineering, Incheon National University)
  • 이용창 (인천대학교 도시과학대학 도시공학과) ;
  • 강준오 (인천대학교 도시건설공학과)
  • Received : 2019.04.16
  • Accepted : 2019.06.18
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, thank to the popularization of light-weight drone through the significant developments in computer technologies as well as the advanced automated procedures in photogrammetry, Unmanned Aircraft Systems have led to a growing interest in industry as a whole. Documentation, maintenance, and restoration projects of large scaled cultural property would required accurate 3D phenomenon modeling and efficient visual inspection methods. The object of this study verify on the accuracies achieved of 3D phenomenon reconstruction as well as on the validity of the preservation, maintenance and restoration of large scaled cultural property by UAS photogrammetry. The test object is cltural heritage(treasure 1324) that is the rock-carved standing Bodhisattva in Soraesan Mountain, Siheung, documented in Goryeo Period(918-1392). This standing Bodhisattva has of particular interests since it's size is largest stone Buddha carved in a rock wall and is wearing a lotus shaped crown that is decorated with arabesque patterns. The positioning accuracy of UAS photogrammetry were compared with non-target total station survey results on the check points after creating 3D phenomenal models in real world coordinates system from photos, and also the quantified informations documented by Culture Heritage Administration were compared with UAS on the bodhisattva image of thin lines. Especially, tests the validity of UAS photogrammetry as a alternative method of visual inspection methods. In particular, we examined the effectiveness of the two techniques as well as the relative fluctuation of rock surface for about 2 years through superposition analysis of 3D points cloud models produced by both UAS image analysis and ground laser scanning techniques. Comparison studies and experimental results prove the accuracy and efficient of UAS photogrammetry in 3D phenomenon modeling, maintenance and restoration for various large-sized Cultural Heritage.

컴퓨터기술의 발달, 영상해석 기술의 고도화 및 경량 무인항공기(UAV)가 대중화되면서 'UAV와 각종 센서의 융합을 기반으로 한 응용시스템(UAS)'이 산업계 전반으로 확산되고 있다. 국가문화유산물의 기록, 유지 관리는 물론 파손 시 복구를 위해서는 효율적인 정밀 3차원 현상 모델링 재현과 주기적 육안점검 기술이 필요하다. 본 연구의 목적은 초대형 마애보살입상의 정밀 현상모델링 재현과 육안점검의 대안으로 UAS 영상을 기반으로 한 사진측량방법의 효용성을 검증하는 것이다. 이를 위해 고려시대(918-1392) 제작된 국내 최대 마애불이며 당초문양의 '보관(모자)'이 특징인 보물 제1324호, 시흥 소래산 마애보살입상을 대상으로 UAS 영상을 획득하고 검사점에 대한 UAS 영상해석과 토탈스테이션 측량시스템 간의 측위정확도를 비교하였다. 또한, 실세계좌표계 상의 3차원 현상모델링 및 선각 현상을 도화하여 문화재청의 정량적 규격 값과 비교하며 유지관리를 위한 육안점검 작업의 대체 가능성을 검토하였다. 특히, UAS 영상해석과 지상 레이저 스캐너에 의한 3차원 재현 모형간의 중첩해석을 통해 두 기법간의 활용성은 물론 2년 전 후의 상대적 변동 상태를 검토하였다. 연구결과, 대형 마애보살입상의 정밀 현상조사 및 육안점검의 대안으로 UAS 영상 해석법의 효용성을 확인할 수 있었으므로 향후, 대형 국가문화유산의 현상조사와 유지관리에 그 활용이 기대된다.

Keywords

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Illustration scheme of the pinhole camera model (a) and of the epipolar geometry (b)

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Diagrammatic representation of the parameters for triangulation principle of Laser Scanner system with Camera

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 4. The location of the UAS shooting points, the 3D reproduction model based on SfM image analysis using both the control points on the rock-carved Bodhisattva and the images acquired on (a) December 2, 2016 and (b) November 16, 2018, respectively.

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 7. Comparison of matching status for overlaid parts between 3D points cloud models of the rock-carved Bodhisattva reconstructed by both UAS photogrammetry surveying and TLS Surveying over about two years ago and after.

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 8. The reconstruction of the rock-carved Bodhisattva by Rubbing, TLS, and UAS image, and UAS-based drawing reproduction of the intaglio line

Table 1. Comparison of quantitative size for the major parts of the rock-carved Bodhisattva between UAS Image based reconstruction model and existing presentation materials

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0006.png 이미지

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 9. The UAS image-based front and right sides of the rock-carved Bodhisattva. In addition, The magnification image of the normal line (the maximum distance deviation) constructed at the inflection point by the slope line connecting the top of the hat and the bottom of the pedestal.

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0008.png 이미지

Figure 10. Structural characteristics of rock wall surface, reinforcement facility of drainage at the upper rock wall, and facilities around rock wall for maintenance of the rock-carved Bodhisattva.

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0009.png 이미지

Figure 3. (a) GNSS surveying for ground control point's coordinate determination, (b) Non_prism total station surveying for coordinates determination of the natural and artificial points on the rock-carved Bodhisattva, (c) shape of artificial target, and (d) UAS photographing for reconstruction of Bodhisattva.

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0010.png 이미지

Figure 5. (a)Terrestrial laser scanning by SX10 TLS surveying, (b)the whole view of the rock around the Bodhisattva with SX10 TLS stations, and (c)detail of points clouds of Bodhisattva.

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_85_f0011.png 이미지

Figure 6. (a) Distribution of the artificial control points and natural check points on the rock-carved Bodhisattva, (b) detail of check points, and (c) comparison of 3D coordinates between the reconstructed Bodhisattva's model and non-prism total station for 3D geometric accuracy verification

References

  1. National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage. 2017. The Periodic Survey of the State-Designated Architectural Structures Heritage. National Treasure and Treasure, ISBN 978-89-299-1357-1 94600.
  2. Kang JM. 2000. A Photogrammetry and Investigation for the Beginning of 20th Century Archtectures. Regional Development Institute of Chungnam National University. Report No. 11-1550000-000017-01.
  3. Kang JM. 2001. The Photogrammetric Measurement and Investigation for the Cultural Properties of Architectures in Modern Ages. Industrial Technology Eesearch Institute of Chunnam National University. Report No. 11-1550000-000048-10.
  4. Cultural Heritage Administration. 2014. Guidance of the Precise Surveying of National Cultural and Heritage. ISBN 978-89-299-0614-6.
  5. Culture Heritage Adminnistration. 2019. Rock-Carved Standing Bodhisattva in Soraesan Mountain[Internet]. [http://www.heritage.go.kr/heri/cul/culSelectDetail.do?pageNo=5_2_1_0&ccbaCpno=1123113240000]. Last accessed 15 Apr 2019.
  6. Ministry of Government Legislation. 2018. The law for prevention of cultural heritage. law number 15639, 2018. 6. 12, Partial amendment.
  7. Siheung culture center. 2019. The State-designated heritage[Internet]. [http://www.shculture.or.kr/board.php?board=dca&menu=03&tname=지정문화재&indexorder=2&command=body&no=1]. Last accessed 20 Apr 2019.
  8. Siheung City. 2019. cyber historical center [Internet]. Last accessed 15 Apr 2019. [http://history.siheung.go.kr/cybr/MainIndex.jsp]. Last accessed 15 Apr 2019.
  9. Siheung city. 2019. National treasure No. 1324 Soraesan Maaesang [Internet]. [http://www.siheung.go.kr/english/soraesan-maaesang]. Last accessed 10 Apr 2019.
  10. Lee YC. 2017. Validation on the utilization of small-scale unmanned aerial systems(sUAS) for topographic volume calculations. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 47(1):111-126. https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2017.47.1.111
  11. Wifco Corporation. 2002. Scan for Safety Diagnosis of Sungnyemun Gate[Internet]. [www.wipco.co.kr]. Last accessed 20 Apr 2019.
  12. Andrea A, Emanuele R, Andrea T. 2012. Imposing semi-local geometric constraints for accurate correspondences selection in structure from motion: A game-theoretic perspective. Int. J. Comput Vis. 97:36-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-011-0432-4
  13. Bendea H, Chiabrando F, Giulio TF, Marenchino D. 2007. Mapping of archaeological areas using a low-cost UAV: the Augusta Bagiennorum test site. 21st International CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece.
  14. Bently. 2019. Context Capture master [Internet]. [https://www.bentley.com/en/products/product-line/reality-modeling-software/contextcapture-center]. Last accessed 20 Apr 2019.
  15. Bolognesi M, Furini A, Russo V, Pellegrinelli A, Russo P. 2015. Testing the low-cost RPAS potential in 3D cultural heritage reconstruction, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Volume XL-5/W4, 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures, 25-27 February 2015, Avila, Spain.
  16. Fernandez-Hernandez J, Gonzalez-Aguilera D, Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P, Mancera-Taboada J. 2012. A new trend for reverse engineering: Robotized aerial system for spatial information management. applied mechanics and materials. 152:1785-90. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.152-154.1785
  17. FIG Congress. 2014. engaging the challenges - Enhancing the Relevance Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia 16-21 June.
  18. Galeazzi, Fabrizio, Lindgren, Stefan, Moyes, Holley. 2013. Comparison of Laser scanning and dense stereo matching techniques in diverse environmental conditions and light exposure, Proceedings of the 18th international conference on cultural heritage and new technologies, (CHNT18, 2013), Vienna.
  19. Grussenmeyer P, Landes T, Voegtle T, Ringle K. 2008. Comparison methods of terrestrial laser scanning, photogrammetry and tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage buildings, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B5.
  20. Herbert B, Tinne T, Luc VG. 2008. Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF). Computer vision and image understanding. 110:346-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014
  21. Konstantinos G, Nikolakopoulos, Konstantina S, Ioannis KK, Nikolaos GA. 2016. UAV vs classical aerial photogrammetry for archaeological studies. Journal of Archaeological Science.
  22. Lambers K, Eisenbeiss H, Sauerbier M, Kupferschmidt D, Gaisecker T, Sotoodeh S, Hanusch T. 2007. Combining photogrammetry and laser scanning for the recording and modelling of the late intermediate period site of Pinchango Alto, Palpa, Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science. 34:1702-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.12.008
  23. Leberl F, Irschara A, Pock T, Meixner P, Gruber M, Scholz S, Wiechert A. 2010. Point clouds: Lidar versus 3D vision. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 76(10):1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.76.10.1123
  24. Lichti DD. 2005. Presentation on active triangulation scanners, department of spatial sciences, Curtin university of technology. Australia
  25. Lowe DG. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, accepted for publication in the international journal of computer vision.
  26. Martin A. Fischler & Robert C. Bolles. 1981. "Random Sample Consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography" (PDF). Comm. ACM. 24(6):381-395. doi:10.1145/358669.358692.
  27. Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. 2005. A performance evaluation of local descriptors, IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. 27(10).
  28. Patias P, Saatsoglou-Paliadeli C, Georgoula O, Pateraki M, Stamnas A, Kyriakou N. 2007. Photogrammetric documentation and digital representation of the Macedonian Palace in Vergina-Aegeae, XXI International CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece, Vol. 16-5/C53, Part 3, 562-6.
  29. Stal C, Lonneville B, Nuttens T, De Maeyer P, De Wulf A. 2014. Highly detailed 3D modelling of Mayan cultural heritage using an UAV, FIG Congress 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 16-21 June.
  30. Waas M, Zell D. 2013. Practical 3D photogrammetry for the conservation and documentation of Cultural Heritage, Conference on cultural heritage and new technologies, International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, (CHNT18, 2013), Vienna.
  31. Trimble. 2019. SX10 [Internet]. [https://geospatial.trimble.com/SX10_stories]. Last accessed 20 Apr 2019.

Cited by

  1. 복층 건물 실내외 역설계를 위한 UAV 및 LiDAR SLAM 조합 효용성 검토 vol.50, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2020.50.2.69
  2. 스마트 팜을 위한 UAS 모니터링의 자연재해 작물 피해 분석 vol.38, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2020.38.6.583
  3. UAS, CRP 및 지상 LiDAR 융합기반 와형석조여래불의 3차원 재현과 고증 연구 vol.51, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2021.51.1.111