DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Probiotic Properties of Bifidobacteria Isolated from Feces of Infants

유아 분변에서 분리한 비피도박테리아의 프로바이오틱스 기능성 연구

  • Received : 2019.02.07
  • Accepted : 2019.03.12
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Bifidobacteria are a prototype probiotic, which normally inhabit the intestinal tract of humans. In the present study, four species of Bifidobacterium isolated from the feces of infants were characterized. The tolerance for acid or bile salt, autoaggregation, and antibiotic resistance of the bacteria were examined. The four species were resistant to low pH, bile salts, and up to 3% bile acid. Autoaggregation rates were as high as 90%. The bacteria were consistently resistant to gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, and nalidixic acid. Due to their tolerance to environmental factors like acid and bile salts, B. longum MG723, B. breve MG729, B. bifidum MG731, and B. animalis subsp. lactis MG741 are potentially valuable as probiotics and may be useful for industrial application.

Keywords

References

  1. Alander, M., Satokari, R., Korpela, R., Saxelin, M., Vilpponen-Salmela, T. and von Wright, A. 1999. Persistence of colonization of human colonic mucosa by a probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, after oral consumption. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:351-354. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.1.351-354.1999
  2. Ann, Y. G. 2011. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Korean J. Food. & Nutr. 24:817-832. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2011.24.4.817
  3. Bang, J. H., Shin, H. J., Choi, H. J., Kim, D. W., Ahn, C. S., Jeong, Y. K. and Joo, W. H. 2012. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus isolates. J. Life Sci. 22:251-258. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2012.22.2.251
  4. Clark, P. A. and Martin, J. H. 1994. Selection of bifidobacteria for use as dietary adjuncts in cultured dairy foods. III. Tolerance to simulated bile concentrations of human small intestines. Cultured Dairy Products Journal.
  5. CLSI. 2006. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline M45-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Waune, PA. USA.
  6. Dunne, C., O'Mahony, L., Murphy, L., Thornton, G., Morrissey, D., O'Halloran, S., Feeney, M., Flynn, S., Fitzgerald, G., Daly, C., Kiely, B., O'Sullivan, G. C., Shanahan, F. and Collins, J. K. 2001. In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:386-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.386s
  7. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. 2001. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. World Health Organization.
  8. Fukushima, Y., Kawata, Y., Hara, H., Terada, A. and Mitsuoka, T. 1998. Effect of a probiotic formula on intestinal immunoglobulin a production in healthy children. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 30:39-44.
  9. Gilliland, S. E., Staley, T. E. and Bush, L. J. 1984. Importance of bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus used as a dietary adjunct. J. Dairy Sci. 67:3045-5301. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81670-7
  10. Guglielmetti, S., Mora, D., Gschwender, M. and Popp, K. 2011. Randomised clinical trial: Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 significantly alleviates irritable bowel syndrome and improves quality of life a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 33:1123-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04633.x
  11. Guo, X. H., Kim, J. M., Nam, H. M., Park, S. Y. and Kim, J. M. 2010. Screening lactic acid bacteria from swine origins for multistrain probiotics based on in vitro functional properties. Anaerobe 16:321-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.03.006
  12. Holt, J. G. 1977. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology 8th ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD. pp. 253-254.
  13. Isolauri, E., Sutas, Y., Kankaanpaa, P., Arvilommi, H. and Salminen, S. 2001. Probiotics: Effects on immunity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:444-450. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.444s
  14. Kassa, I. A., Hamze, M., Hober, D., Chihib, N. E. and Drider, D. 2014. Identification of vaginal lactobacilli with potential probiotic propertied isolated from women in North Lebanon. Microb. Ecol. 67:722-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0384-7
  15. Kos, B., Suskovia, J., Vukovia, S., Simpraga, M., Frece, J. and Matosia, S. 2003. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94:981-987. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01915.x
  16. Kurmann, J. A. 1998. Starters for fermented milks: starters with selected intestinal bacteria. Bull. IDF. 227:41-55.
  17. Lankaputhra, W. E. V. and Shah, N. P. 1995. Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. In the presence of acid and bile salts. Cult. Dairy. Products J. 30:2-7.
  18. Lin, W. H., Hwangb, C. F., Chenc, L. W. and Tsen, H. Y. 2006. Viable counts, characteristic evaluation for commercial lactic acid bacteria products. Food Microbiol. 23:74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.01.013
  19. Malik, S., Petrova, M. I., Claes, I. J. J., Verhoeven, T. L. A., Busschaert, P., Vaneechoutte, M., Lievens, B., Lambrichts, I., Siezen, R. J., Balzarini, J., Vanderleyden, J. and Lebeer, S. 2013. The highly autoaggregative and adhesive phenotype of the vaginal Lactobacillus plantarum strain CMPG5300 is sortase dependent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79:4576-4585. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00926-13
  20. Maslowski, K. M., Vieira, A. T., Ng, A., Kranich, J., Sierro, F., Yu, D., Schilter, H. C., Rolph, M. S., Mackay, F., Artis, D., Xavier, R. J., Teixeira, M. M. and Mackay, C. R. 2009. Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature 461:1282-1286. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08530
  21. Mishra, V. and Prasad, D. N. 2005. Application of in vitro methods for selection of Lactobacillus casei strains as potential probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 103:109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.10.047
  22. Oakety, H. J., Harty, D. W. S. and Knox, K. W. 1995. Enzyme production by lactobacilli and the potential link with infective endocarditis. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 78:142-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb02834.x
  23. Poupard, J. A., Husain, I. and Norris, R. F. 1973. Biology of the bifidobacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 37:136-165. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.37.2.136-165.1973
  24. Saarela, M., Mogensen, G., Fondn, R., Mtt, J. and Mattila-Sandholm, T. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. J. Biotechnol. 84:197-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00375-8
  25. Sanders, M. E. 1995. Lactic acid bacteria as promoters of human health. In Functional fool: designer foods, pharmafood, nutraceuticals. I. Goldberg, ed. London.
  26. Savard, P., Lamarche, B., Paradis, M. E., Thiboutot, H., Laurin, E. and Roy, D. 2011. Impact of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5-containing yoghurt, on fecal bacterial counts of healthy adults. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 149:50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.026
  27. Seo, J. G., Lee, G. S., Kim, J. E. and Chung, M. J. 2010. Development of probiotic products and challengers. KSBB J. 25:303-310.
  28. Sim, J. H., Oh, S. J., Kim, S. K. and Baek, Y. J. 1995. Comparative tests on the acid tolerance of some lactic acid bacteria species isolated from lactic fermented products. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 27:101-104.
  29. Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121
  30. Vrese, M., Stegelmann, A., Ritcher, B., Fenselau, S., Laue, C. and Schrezenmeir, J. 2001. Probiotics: compensation for lactase insufficiency. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:S421-S429. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.421s

Cited by

  1. 프락토올리고당을 함유한 야콘 추출물의 비피더스균에 대한 잠재적인 프리바이오틱 효과 vol.52, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2020.52.2.149