Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

The Influences of Intellectual Property-based Entrepreneurship on major Entrepreneurial Performance

지식재산기반 창업의 효과 및 시사점: 주요 창업성과에 대한 특허기반 창업의 영향

  • Received : 2019.04.19
  • Accepted : 2019.06.29
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Based on the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship(KSTE) and resource based view(RBV), this study examines that how patent based entrepreneurship impacts on improving key performances such as financing, firm innovation, sales, product selling growth, employment. This study which is conducted with data from 353 startup firms indicates that patent based entrepreneurship has positive effects on performance of financing, innovation, product selling growth, and employment. On the other hand, there is no effect of patent-based entrepreneurship on sales performance. This statistical results were the same The results were the same when the independent variables were measured as intensity of patent based entrepreneurship which indicates the rate of patent based product or service among total number of product or service of the startup company.

이 연구는 창업성과를 높이는 요인에 대한 새로운 시사점을 제시한다. 창업가의 지식확산이론(Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship)과 자원기반이론(Resource Based Vies)을 기반으로, 특허기반 창업이 주요 창업성과에 미치는 영향을 분석했다. 창업성과는 자금조달, 혁신성, 매출, 제품판매증가율, 단기고용 등을 포함했다. 특허기반 창업의 효과를 다각적으로 검토하기 위해 특허기반 창업 변수는 특허기반 창업여부와 특허기반 창업강도(intensity)로 세분화하여 분석했다. 지식재산기반 창업촉진사업 프로그램에 참가한 353개 창업기업 데이터를 토대로 분석한 결과, 특허기반 창업은 자금조달, 혁신성, 단기 제품판매증가율, 단기고용 등 성과 면에서 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 반면 단기 매출성과에는 효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이 같은 통계적 양상은 특허기반 창업여부와 특허기반 창업강도 모두 동일하게 나타났다. 이는 특허기반 창업이 창업기업의 자금조달 역량과, 미래 경쟁력, 성장성을 높이는 데 유효한 방법임을 시사한다. 특허 등 지식재산을 기반으로 창업을 하는 방식은 기업과 산업의 질적 고도화를 실현하는 데 중추적 역할을 한다는 기존 연구의 흐름을 이어가며, 창업가들의 설문조사에 기반한 계량분석을 통해 그 효과성을 실증적으로 증명한다는 점에서 의의를 지닌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E.(2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9
  2. Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L.(2014). National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications, Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
  3. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 32(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
  4. Acs, Z. J., & Plummer, L. A.(2005). Penetrating the"knowledge filter"in regional economies, The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0245-x
  5. Autio, E., & Acs, Z.(2010). Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(3), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.93
  6. Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M., & Lehmann, E.(2005). The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship and Technological Diffusion in University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 69-91.
  7. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. M.(2012). Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government, Small Business Economics, 39(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9299-y
  8. Barney, J.(1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  9. Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B.(2010). The Missing Link: Knowledge Diffusion and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth, Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9235-1
  10. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P.(1990). A model of growth through creative destruction, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1(1), w3223.
  11. Balasubramanian, N., & Sivadasan, J.(2011). What happens when firms patent? New evidence from US economic census data, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00058
  12. Chen, M. H.(2007). Entrepreneurial leadership and new ventures: Creativity in entrepreneurial teams, Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00439.x
  13. Choi, J. Y.(2013) Concreteness of technological capabilities and Performance of technology based Start-up company, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.8.1.201303.29
  14. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S.(1992). The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distributions, The American Economic Review, 773-799.
  15. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P.(2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)(No. w7552), National Bureau of Economic Research.
  16. Coulibaly, S. K., Erbao, C., & Mekongcho, T. M.(2018). Economic globalization, entrepreneurship, and development, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.028
  17. DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L.(1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry, Strategic management journal, 20(10), 953-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<953::AID-SMJ59>3.0.CO;2-3
  18. Ernst, H.(2001). Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level, Research Policy, 30(1), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00098-0
  19. Fink, L. D.(2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses, John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Gonzalez-Pernia, J. L., Pena-Legazkue, I., & Vendrell-Herrero, F.(2012). Innovation, entrepreneurial activity and competitiveness at a sub-national level, Small Business Economics, 39(3), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9330-y
  21. Hayton, J. C., Cacciotti, G., Giazitzoglu, A., Mitchell, J. R., & Ainge, C.(2013). Understanding fear of failure in entrepreneurship: A cognitive process framework, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 33(6), 1.
  22. Jamali, B., MohammadKazemi, R., Farsi, J. Y., & Dehkordi, A. M.(2018). The Study on the Theories' Gap of Technological Entrepreneurship Opportunities Emergence, International Business Research, 11(2), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v11n2p79
  23. Kim, W. J. & Chung, W. Y.(2007) A Study on the Relationship Between Entrepreneur Characteristics and the Performance of Small Firms, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.2.3.200709.33
  24. Lee, H. M., Kim, M. S., & Kim, E. K.(2012) A Study on the Influence of Patent Activities of Entrepreneurial Entrepreneurs on Initial Firm Performance, Conference of The Korean Society of Business Venturing, 153-162.
  25. Mann, R. J., & Sager, T. W.(2007). Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups, Research Policy, 36(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.002
  26. Na, S. K. & Lee, J. S.(2007). Analysis of survival factors of start-up companies, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 20(3), 1325-1340.
  27. Pao-Long, C., & Wei-Ling, C.(2002). The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance: Empirical evidence from high-tech firms in Taiwan, International Journal of Management, 19(4), 622.
  28. Porter, M. E.(1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Competitive Intelligence Review, 1(1), 14-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880010112
  29. Romer, P. M.(1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.3
  30. Ryu, J. H.(2014) Meta-analysis about the study related with foundation: As the center from 1998 to 2013 treatises, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.9.1.201402.51
  31. Schumpeter, J.A.(1947). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York.
  32. Simonton, D. K.(2012). Taking the US Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications, Creativity research journal, 24(2-3), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
  33. Sichelman, T., & Graham, S. J.(2010). Patenting by entrepreneurs: an empirical study, Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev., 17, 111.
  34. Shane, S.(2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation, Management science, 47(2), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837
  35. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R.(2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity, Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002
  36. Xie, K., Song, Y., Zhang, W., Hao, J., Liu, Z., & Chen, Y.(2018). Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Donghu High-Tech Zone, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.021
  37. Zbierowski, P. (2017). The Aspirations of New Technology-Based Firms in CEE and CIS Countries, Форсайт, 11(3 (eng)).
  38. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S.(2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology, Management science, 48(1), 138-153. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274