DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validation of the Personality Measurement Tools for College Students: Focusing on Nursing Students

대학생 인성 측정도구의 타당화 : 간호대학생을 대상으로

  • 허명륜 (군산간호대학교) ;
  • 장양민 (충북보건과학대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2019.05.24
  • Accepted : 2019.08.09
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity and reliability of the personality measurement tool for nursing college students. Methods: Questionnaires were issued to 300 nursing students, with 275 eventually collected. The items were confirmed by validity experts. Construct validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability analysis was tested using Cronbach's ${\alpha}$. Criterion validity was tested by analyzing correlation with the college adjustment scale. Results: Eight factors were confirmed by exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the model fit (Root-mean-square residual .03; Root-mean-square error of approximation .06; Comparative fit index .92); and convergent validity and discriminant validity were confirmed. In addition, the criterion validity was confirmed through correlation (r=.64, p<.001) with the college adjustment scale. The reliability of this tool was Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ .94. Conclusion: This tool can be used to measure personality in nursing education and can be used to develop and evaluate personality programs.

Keywords

References

  1. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
  2. Chi, E. L., Lee, Y. S., & Do, S. L. (2014). Development and validation of the character index instrument. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 35, 151-174.
  3. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, U.S.A: Sage publications.
  4. Gray, J. R., Grove, S. K., & Burns, N. (2013). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (7th ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences.
  5. Hong, S. H. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.
  6. Jeong, E. I., & Park, Y. H. (2009). Development and validation of the college adjustment scale. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 21, 69-92.
  7. Kim, E. J. (2017). Development and validation of a character scale for university students. Journal of Adolescent Welfare, 19(3), 81-108. https://doi.org/10.19034/KAYW.2017.19.3.04
  8. Kim, J. S., & Kim, H. N. (2016). Effects of character, emotional intelligence and ego-resilience on college adaptation in nursing students. Journal of Enneagram Studies, 13(2), 7-28.
  9. Lee, K. Y., & Kim, C. S. (2017). The development and validation of the personality measurement tools for college students. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(16), 401-422.
  10. Lee, Y. S., & Kwon, M. J. (2015). A longitudinal study on character levels for college students. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 36, 259-282.
  11. Lim, M. H. (2016). Effects of character, critical thinking disposition and professional self-concept on college adjustment in nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(8), 560-568. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.8.560
  12. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 35(6), 382-386.
  13. Nam, M. H., & Kim, H. O. (2018). Effect of personality and resilience on satisfaction with major in nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 24(4), 298-306. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2018.24.4.298
  14. Nam, S. M., & Park, J. S. (2019). Needs analysis for character education of nursing college students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19, 545-561.
  15. Park, E. M. (2012). Effects of personality education program for university students. International Journal of Contents, 12(7), 497-509.
  16. Personality. (2008). In Standard korean dictionary. Retrieved from https://stdict.korean.go.kr
  17. Roh, G. (2014). SPSS & AMOS 21. Seoul, Korea: Hanbit Academy Inc.
  18. Sim, S. S., & Bang, M. R. (2016). The relationship between the character, interpersonal relations, and adjustment to a college life of nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(12), 634-642. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.12.634
  19. Son, K. W. (2016). Trends and challenges of the character education research. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 39, 97-133. https://doi.org/10.18850/JEES.2016.39.04
  20. Son, K. W., & Jeong, C. W. (2014). A study on the analysis of korean adolescents' character and its implications for character education. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 33, 27-52.
  21. Son, K. W., & Um, S. H. (2019). Developmental characteristics and influencing factors of character index of university students. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 52, 199-252. https://doi.org/10.18850/JEES.2019.52.08
  22. Yeom, E. Y., & Moon, H. K. (2017). Nursing students' perception of importance of personality and personality education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7, 691-701. https://doi.org/10.14257/AJMAHS.2017.12.80