DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatial Estimation of Forest Species Diversity Index by Applying Spatial Interpolation Method - Based on 1st Forest Health Management data-

공간보간법 적용을 통한 산림 종다양성지수의 공간적 추정 - 제1차 산림의 건강·활력도 조사 자료를 이용하여 -

  • Lee, Jun-Hee (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Ryu, Ji-Eun (Environmental GIS/RS Center, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Yu-Young (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Chung, Hye-In (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Jeon, Seong-Woo (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lim, Jong-Hwan (National institute of forest science) ;
  • Choi, Hyung-Soon (National institute of forest science)
  • Received : 2019.04.01
  • Accepted : 2019.08.19
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

The 1st Forest Health Management survey was conducted to examine the health of the forests in Korea. However, in order to understand the health of the forests, which account for 63.7% of the total land area in South Korea, it is necessary to comprehensively spatialize the results of the survey beyond the sampling points. In this regard, out of the sample points of the 1st Forest Health Management survey in Gyeongbuk area, 78 spots were selected. For these spots, the species diversity index was selected from the survey sections, and the spatial interpolation method was applied. Inverse distance weighted (IDW), Ordinary Kriging and Ordinary Cokriging were applied as spatial interpolation methods. Ordinary Cokriging was performed by selecting vegetation indices which are highly correlated with species diversity index as a secondary variable. The vegetation indices - Normalized Differential Vegetation Index(NDVI), Leaf Area Index(LAI), Sample Ratio(SR) and Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index(SAVI) - were extracted from Landsat 8 OLI. Verification was performed by the spatial interpolation method with Mean Error(ME) and Root Mean Square Error(RMSE). As a result, Ordinary Cokriging using SR showed the most accurate result with ME value of 0.0000218 and RMSE value of 0.63983. Ordinary Cokriging using SR was proven to be more accurate than Ordinary Kriging, IDW, using one variable. This indicates that the spatial interpolation method using the vegetation indices is more suitable for spatialization of the biodiversity index sample points of 1st Forest Health Management survey.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae MK and Cho TH. 2013. The Capability Strengthen Strategies and Energy Substitution Effect of Forestry Sectors as Climate Change Response Mechanism: Focused on Woody Biomass. Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. 17(1) : 87-96. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2013.17.1.010
  2. Bennett DD and Tkacz BM. 2008. Forest health monitoring in the United States a program overview. Australian Forestry 71 : 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2008.10675039
  3. Choi JH and Kim BJ. 2015. A Study for Applicability of Cokriging Techniques for Estimating the Real Transaction Price of Land. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 23(1) : 55-63. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2015.23.1.055
  4. Choi JK. 2007. Geostatistics. Seoul: Sigmapress. (in Korean with English summary)
  5. Choi SK.Lee SK and Wang Baio. 2014. Analysis of Vegetation Cover Fraction on Landsat OLI using NDVI. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography. 32(1) : 9-17. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2014.32.1.9
  6. Goovaerts P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, Inc.
  7. HENDRY SJ. 2004. Monitoring of forest health in Britain: the forest condition survey and Level 1 networks. Forest Research annual report and accounts.
  8. Hong GD. 1996. Atmospheric correction method of Landsat TM, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing. 10(3) : 195-172 (in Korean with English abstract).
  9. Huete AR. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index(SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment. 25 : 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X
  10. Jin Li and Andrew D. Heap. 2014. Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review. Environmental Modelling & Software 53(2014) : 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008
  11. J. Luis Hernandez-Stefanoni and Raul Ponce-Hernandez. 2006. Mapping The Spatial Variability Of Plant Diversity In A Tropical Forest. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 117 : 307-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-0885-z
  12. John A. Ludwig.LUDWIG QUARTET and James F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical Ecology: A Primer in Methods and Computing.
  13. Jung GS..Koo S and Yoo HH. 2011. Temperature Change Analysis for Land Use Zoning Using Landsat Satellite Imagery. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System 19(2) : 55-61 (in Korean with English summary).
  14. Jung JC and Cho H. L. 2006. Application of Spatial Interpolation to Rainfall Data. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 14(1) : 29-41 (in Korean with English summary)
  15. Kim EG. 2012. Review of the Role of Forest sector on Climate Change. Journal of Sustainability Research. 3(2) : 1-20. (in Korean with English summary)
  16. Kim HJ and Jo WK. 2012. Assessment of PM-10 Monitoring Stations in Daegu using GIS Interpolation. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 20 (2) : 3-13. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2012.20.2.003
  17. Kurt HR.James DW and John WC. 2003. A Preliminary Assessment of Montreal Process Indicators of Forest Fragmentation for the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 91 : 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:emas.0000009240.65355.92
  18. Kim KA.Jang, SK.Han JS and Yoo KO. 2009. Environmental Characteristics of Hanabusaya asiatica Habitats. HORTICULTURE ABSTRACTS. pp.174-174. (in Korean with English summary)
  19. Kim MH.Kang IJ.Kim SS and Min BG. 2011. Distribution of air pollution using GIS techniques. Proceedings of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science. 2011(10) : 240-242. (in Korean with English summary)
  20. Kim SH.Sung JH.Koo NI.Kim YS and Kim KH. 2016. The 1st Forest Health Monitoring. National Institute of Forest science (in Korean with English summary)
  21. Kim YS.Shim KM.Jung MP and Choi IT. 2014. Accuracy Comparison of Air Temperature Estimation using Spatial Interpolation Methods according to Application of Temprerature Lapse Rate Effect. Journal of Climate Change Research. 5 : 323-329. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2014.5.4.323
  22. Kurt HR.James DW and John WC. 2003. A Preliminary Assessment of Montreal Process Indicators of Forest Fragmentation for the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 91 : 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:emas.0000009240.65355.92
  23. Lee HS. 2010. Comparison and Evaluation of Root Mean Square for Parameter Settings of Spatial Interpolation Method. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 13(3) : 29-41. (in Korean with English summary)
  24. Lee KI.Hwang JH.Jang RI.Ryu JE and Jeon SW. 2018. Study on the Appropriate Spatial unit to Measure Biodiversity Using National Ecosystem Survey Data. Journal of Korean Environmental Restoration Technology. 21 (5) : 29-37. (in Korean with English summary)
  25. Lee KS.Lim DG.Choi YW.Yun W and Cho GS. 2011. The Analysis of Chloride Ion of Ground Water in the West Coast District of Jeollabuk-Do using Spatial Interpolation. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 19(4) : 23-33.(in Korean with English summary)
  26. Lee SC.Choi SH.Lee WK.Yoo SJ and Byun JG. 2011. The Effect of Climate Data Applying Temperature Lapse Rate on Prediction of Potential Forest Distribution. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 19(2) : 19-27. (in Korean with English summary)
  27. Montreal Process Liaison Office: 2000. 'Montreal process year 2000 progress report - progress andinnovation in implementing criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests'. The Montreal Process Liaison Office. Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Canada.
  28. Park IH and Cho KJ. 2011. Synecological Characteristics and Vitality Analysis of the Berchemia berchemiaefolia Habitat. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 14(2) : 97-105. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2011.14.2.097
  29. Park JC and Kim MK. 2009. A Study on the Use of a Terrain Aspect Variable in Producing the Precipitation Distribution Map applying Cokriging: A Case of Jeju Island. Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association. 16(3) : 59-66. (in Korean with English summary)
  30. Park JG.Go SY and Cho GS. 2013. Vegetation Classification using KOMPSAT-2 Imagery and High-resolution airborne imagery in Urban Area, Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System 21(4) : 21-27. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7319/KOGSIS.2013.21.4.021
  31. Park NW and Jang DH. 2008. Mapping of temperature and rainfall using DEM and multivariate kriging. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society. 43(6) : 1002-1015. (in Korean with English summary)
  32. Sellers P.J.Mintz Y.Sud, YC and Dalcher A. 1986. A simple biosphere model(SiB) for use within general circulation models. Journal of Atmospheric Science. 43 :505-531. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0505:ASBMFU>2.0.CO;2
  33. US Forest Service and Forest Health Protection Durham Field Office. 2006. Forest Health Assessment Great Bay National Wildlife Refuge.
  34. Yang HM.Kang SK and Kim JH. 2001. Selection of Desirable Species and Estimation of Composition Ratio in a Natural Deciduous Forest. Journal Of Korean Society Of Forest Science. 90(4) : 465-475. (in Korean with English summary)
  35. Yoon SY.Choi H and Kim GH. 2017. Estimation of Vegetation Cover Fraction Using Landsat 8 OLI imagery and Field Survey Data. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 25(3) : 95-100. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2017.25.3.095