Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on The Organizational Characteristics of SMEs on Market Performance through the Acceptance of Open Innovation -Focused on Woman's SMEs-

조직의 특성이 개방형 혁신 수용을 통한 시장성과에 미치는 영향 - 여성기업을 중심으로 -

  • 서용모 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 현병환 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.15
  • Accepted : 2019.11.20
  • Published : 2019.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is an empirical analysis of the characteristics of the organization and the performance of the company. The characteristics that make up the culture of a company's organization determine its success. Overcoming the company's closed cultural characteristics, entrepreneurial orientation, delegation, openness of organizational culture, and R&D capabilities have a positive impact on the company's performance. These characteristics of the company also play a positive role in embracing open innovation to generate innovative results. The characteristics of a company positively consider the acceptance and utilization of external resources. These variables proved that the nature of a company's organization is a factor in generating a company's performance. In this process, open innovation and the acceptance of external resources also proved to be a positive factor in generating corporate performance. The contents of this study provide an academic basis for the variables that build corporate organizational culture and provide a practical attitude to the role of leaders in managing corporate organizational culture. This study is focused on women's SMEs. n future research, the overall characteristics of the company will be considered. In addition, this study attempts to verify by applying various variables for generating performance of domestic SMEs by reflecting overcoming regional limitations.

본 연구는 조직의 특징과 기업의 성과에 대한 실증 분석을 실시한 내용이다. 기업의 조직의 문화를 이룬 특징은 바로 기업의 성패를 좌우하게 된다. 기업의 폐쇄적인 문화적 특징을 극복하고 기업가적 지향성, 권한위임, 조직문화의 개방성 및 R&D역량은 기업의 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다. 이러한 기업의 특성은 개방형 혁신을 수용하여 혁신적인 성과를 창출하는데도 긍정적인 역할을 한다. 기업의 특성은 외부자원에 대한 수용과 활용을 긍정적으로 생각하게 된다. 이러한 변인들은 결국 기업의 조직의 특성이 기업의 성과를 창출하는 요인이 된다는 것을 검증하였다. 이러한 과정 속에서 개방형 혁신과 외부자원의 수용도 기업의 성과를 창출하는데 긍정적인 요인으로 작용하고 있음을 검증하였다. 본 연구의 내용은 기업의 조직문화를 구축하는 변인에 대한 학술적 기반을 제공하였으며, 기업의 조직문화를 운영하는 리더의 역할에 대한 실무적 태도를 제공하고 있다. 본 연구는 여성 기업을 중심으로 검증을 실시하였다. 추후 연구에서는 기업의 전반적인 특성을 고려하여 연구를 진행할 예정이다. 또한, 지역적 한계에 대한 극복을 반영하여 국내 중소기업의 성과 창출을 위한 다양한 변인들을 적용하여 검증하려고 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Wives Who Earn More Than Their Husband.
  2. S. Brunswicker & V. V. Vrande. (2014), Exploring Open Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, In Chesbrough, H., Vanhvaerbeke, W., West, J., New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, pp. 135-163
  3. B. K. Cho & S, H. Kim. (2013), The impact of open innovation activities on new product development and business performance. Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 24(1), 1-23.
  4. Y. H. Chiang & K. P. Hung(2010), Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Inter-organizational Knowledge, R&D Management, 40(3), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00588.x
  5. E. D. Kim, H. B. Kim & K. S. Bae. (2015). Analysis on Determinant Affecting Open Innovation of Korean ICT Service Industry : Focusing on Network Service, Korean management science review, 32(4), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2015.32.4.175
  6. B. Y. Cho, K. J. Shin & K. T. Park. (2010). An Exploratory Study on Framework for Partner Relationships and Open Innovation Processes, Journal of information management, 41(2), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.2.047
  7. A. M. Pettigrew. (1979), On Studying Organizational Cultures, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570-581. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392363
  8. W. Ouchi. (1981), Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge, Business Horizons, 24(6), 82-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(81)90031-8
  9. T. E. Deal & A. A. Kennedy. (1982). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  10. J. A. Schumpeter. (1934). Theory of Economic Development, 4th ed., Berlin Germany: Drucker and Humblot, Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.
  11. D. Miller & P. H. Friesen.(1983), Strategy Making and Environment: The Third Link, Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304
  12. A. Shapero & L. Sokol. (1982), The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Enclyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (pp. 72-90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  13. J. G. Covin & D. P. Slevin. (1989). Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments, Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
  14. R. C. Becherer & J. G. Maurer. (1997), The Moderating Effect of Environmental Variables on the Entrepreneurial and Marketing Orientation of Entrepreneur-led Firms, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879702200103
  15. G. T. Lumpkin & G. G. Dess. (2001). Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle, Science Direct, 16(5), 429-451.
  16. C. K. Lee & J. M. Pennings. (2001), Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and Performance: A Study of Technology-bases Ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 615-640. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.181
  17. J. G. Covin, D. P. Slevin & T. J. Covin. (1990). Content and Performance of Growth-seeking Strategies: A Comparison of Small firms in High- and Low-technology Industries, Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6), 391-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90013-J
  18. J. Dabrowska & I. Savitskaya. (2014). When Culture Matters: Exploring the Open Innovation Paradigm, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 8(1), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2014.058048
  19. C. S. An & Y. D. Lee. (2011). An Empirical Analysis of the Influence Factors on Open Innovation Activities in Korea, Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 14(3), 431-465.
  20. Spreitzer. (1996). Social Structural Characteristics of Psychological Empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483-504. https://doi.org/10.2307/256789
  21. A. Locke. Edwin, David M. Schweiger. (1979). Participation in decision-making : one more look, Research in organizational behavior : an annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, 1, 265-339.
  22. G. A. Yukl. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  23. K. M. Ryoo, H. J. Jung & J. S. Shin. (2013). Effect of Manager's Power Delegation on Service Agility and Corporate Performance, International Jouirnal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 27(6), 175-186.
  24. A. C. Eberhart, W. F. Maxwell & A. R. Siddique. (2004), An Examination of Long-term Abnormal Stock Returns and Operating Performance following R&D Increase, The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 623-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00644.x
  25. R. C. Yam, M. J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun & E. P. Y. Tang. (2004). An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China, Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  26. D. K. Bok & W. H. Lee. (2006), Current Status and Analysis of Open Technology Innovation in Korean Manufacturing Industry, SERI.
  27. H. Chesbrough. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting Technology, Boston, Harvard Business School Publishing Company.
  28. M. A. Mone, W. Mckinley & V. L. Barker. (1998). Organizational decline and innovation: a contingency framework, Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192965
  29. R. D. Hisrich & M. P. Peters. (1991). On Your Own: How to Start, Develop and Manage a New Business, Business One Irwin: Homewood.
  30. M. S. Shin & S. E. Kim. (2012), The Effects of Financial Characteristics on the Relationship between R&D Investment and Firm Valu, Journal of Technology Innovation, 20(1), 45-74.
  31. J. K. Shin & S. K. Whang. (2008), R&D Intensity and Technology Innovation in the SMEs : The Role of Cross Functional Cooperation and Industrial Cooperation Culture, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 21(6), 2523-2548.
  32. S. J. Chang & Y. S. Shin. (2008). Relationship between R&D investment, technology management capability, and financial performance, Korean Academic Society of Business Adiministration, 2008(8), 1-25.
  33. J. Hagedoorn & J. Schakenraad. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance, Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150404
  34. B. Y. Lee. (2014). An Empirical Study of the Impacts of Open Innovation of SMEs and HPE on Business Performance, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 27(6), 2483-2511.
  35. V. de Vrande, J. De Jong, P. W. Vanhaverbeke & M. De Rochemont. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
  36. U. Lichtenthaler. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.3.zol75
  37. R. Boschma. (2005), Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
  38. M. M. Naqshbandi & S. Kaur. (2014), Do managerial ties support or stifle open innovation?. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(4), 652-675 https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2013-0407
  39. Y. K. Jung. (2016), Organizational culture type, open innovation and innovation performance, Korean Academic Society of Business Adiministration, 2016(8), 764-783.