DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation on seismic behavior of combined retaining structure with different rock shapes

  • Lin, Yu-liang (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University) ;
  • Zhao, Lian-heng (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University) ;
  • Yang, T.Y. (Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia) ;
  • Yang, Guo-lin (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University) ;
  • Chen, Xiao-bin (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University)
  • Received : 2019.08.16
  • Accepted : 2019.11.07
  • Published : 2020.03.10

Abstract

A combination of a gravity wall and an anchor beam is widely used to support the high soil deposit on rock mass. In this study, two groups of shaking table test were performed to investigate the responses of such combined retaining structure, where the rock masses were shaped with a flat surface and a curved surface, respectively. Meanwhile, the dynamic numerical analysis was carried out for a comparison or an extensive study. The results were studied and compared between the combined retaining structures with different shaped rock masses with regard to the acceleration response, the earth pressure response, and the axial anchor force. The acceleration response is not significantly influenced by the surface shape of rock mass. The earth pressure response on the combined retaining structure with a flat rock surface is more intensive than the one with a curved rock surface. The anchor force is significantly enlarged by seismic excitation with a main earthquake-induced increment at the first intensive pulse of Wenchuan motion. The value of anchor force in the combined retaining structure with a flat rock surface is generally larger than the one with a curved rock surface. Generally, the combined retaining structure with a curved rock surface presents a better seismic performance.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, Central South University, China University of Mining & Technology, China Scholarship Council

References

  1. Abuhajar, O., El Naggar, H. and Newson, T. (2015), "Seismic soil-culvert interaction", Can. Geotech. J., 52(11), 1649-1667.https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0493.
  2. Aminpoor, M.M. and Ghanbari, A. (2014), "Design charts for yield acceleration and seismic displacement of retaining walls with surcharge through limit analysis", Struct. Eng. Mech., 52(6): 1225-1256. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.6.1225.
  3. Aminpour, M.M., Maleki, M. and Ghanbari, A. (2017), "Investigation of the effect of surcharge on behavior of soil slopes", Geomech. Eng., 13(4), 653-669. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.13.4.653.
  4. Bakir, B.S. and Akis, E. (2005), "Analysis of a highway embankment failure associated with the 1999 Duzce, Turkey earthquake", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 25(3), 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.05.001.
  5. Baker, R., Shukha, R., Operstein, V. and Frydman, S. (2006), "Stability charts for pseudo-static slope stability analysis", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 26(9), 813-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.01.023.
  6. Candia, G., Mikola, R.G. and Sitard, N. (2016), "Seismic response of retaining walls with cohesive backfill: Centrifuge model studies", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 90, 411-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.013.
  7. Chen, G., Chen, S., Zuo, X., Du, X., Qi, C. and Wang, Z. (2015), "Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 76, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.012.
  8. Choudhury, D. and Nimbalkar, S. (2005), "Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method", Geotechnique, 55(9), 699-702. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.9.699.
  9. Ertugrul, O.L. (2016), "Numerical modeling of the seismic racking behavior of box culverts in dry cohesionless soils", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 20(5), 1737-1746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0235-1.
  10. Fox, P.J., Sander, A.C., Elgamal, A., Greco, P., Isaacs, D., Stone, M. and Wong, S. (2015), "Large soil confinement box for seismic performance testing of geo-structures", Geotech. Test. J., 38(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140034.
  11. Ghiasi, V. and Mozafari, V. (2018), "Seismic response of buried pipes to microtunnelling method under earthquake loads", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 113, 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.020.
  12. Greco, V.R. (2001), "Pseudo-static thrust on cantilever walls", Soils Found., 41(3), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.41.3_87.
  13. Griffiths, D.V. and Fenton, G.A. (2004), "Probabilistic slopes tability analysis by finite elements", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 130(5), 507-518. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:5(507)
  14. Guler, E. and Selek, O. (2014), "Reduced-scale shaking table tests on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with modular racing", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 140(6), 04014015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001102.
  15. Huang, C.C. (2000), "Investigations of soil retaining structures damaged during the Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake", J. Chin. Inst. Eng., 23(4), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2000.9670562.
  16. Iskander, M., Chen, Z., Omidvar, M., Guzman, I. and Elsherif, O. (2013), "Active static and seismic earth pressure for c-psi soils", Soils Found., 53(5), 639-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.08.003.
  17. Jo, S.B., Ha, J.G., Lee, J.S. and Kim, D.S. (2017), "Evaluation of the seismic earth pressure for inverted T-shape stiff retaining wall in cohesionless soils via dynamic centrifuge", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 92, 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.009.
  18. Jo, S.B., Ha, J.G., Yoo, M., Choo, Y.W. and Kim, D.S. (2014), "Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests", B. Earthq. Eng., 12(2), 961-980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9558-9.
  19. Kamai, T. and Sangawa, A. (2011), "Landslides on ancient embankments in the Kinki district (Japan): Strong motion seismoscope of the 1596 Keichou-Fushimi earthquake", Quatern. Int., 242(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.04.002.
  20. Khajehzadeh, M., Taha, M.R. and Eslami, M. (2013), "Efficient gravitational search algorithm for optimum design of retaining walls", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.1.111
  21. Latha, G.M. and Santhanakumar, P. (2015), "Seismic response of reduced-scale modular block and rigid faced reinforced walls through shaking table tests", Geotext. Geomembr., 43(4), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.008.
  22. Lin, Y.L., Cheng, X.M. and Yang, G.L. (2018a), "Shaking table test and numerical simulation on a combined retaining structure response to earthquake loading", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 108, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.008.
  23. Lin, Y.L., Cheng, X.M., Yang, G.L. and Li, Y. (2018b), "Seismic response of a sheet-pile wall with anchoring frame beam by numerical simulation and shaking table test", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 115, 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.028.
  24. Lin, Y.L., Yang, X., Yang, G.L., Li, Y. and Zhao, L.H. (2017), "A closed-form solution for seismic passive earth pressure behind a retaining wall supporting cohesive-frictional backfill" Acta Geotech., 12(2): 453-461. http:// doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0472-6
  25. Lin, Y.L., Leng, W.M., Yang, G.L., Li, L. and Yang, J.S. (2015), "Seismic response of embankment slopes with different reinforcing measures in shaking table tests", Nat. Hazards, 76(2), 791-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1517-5.
  26. Motlagh, A.T., Ghanbari, A., Maedeh, P.A. and Wu, W. (2018), "A new analytical approach to estimate the seismic tensile force of geosynthetic reinforcement respect to the uniform surcharge of slopes", Earthq. Struct., 15(6), 687-699. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.6.687.
  27. Nian, T.K., Liu, B., Han, J. and Huang, R.Q. (2014), "Effect of seismic acceleration directions on dynamic earth pressures in retaining structures", Geomech. Eng., 7(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.7.3.263.
  28. Savalle, N., Vincens, E. and Hans, S. (2018), "Pseudo-static scaled-down experiments on dry stone retaining walls: Preliminary implications for the seismic design", Eng. Struct., 171, 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.080.
  29. Shukha, R. and Baker, R. (2008), "Design implications of the vertical pseudo-static coefficient in slope analysis", Comput. Geotech., 35(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.01.005.
  30. Singh, R., Roy, D. and Jain, S.K. (2005), "Analysis of earth dams affected by the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake", Eng. Geol., 80(3-4), 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.002.
  31. Suzuki, M., Shimura, N., Fukumura, T., Yoneda, O. and Tasaka, Y.(2015), "Seismic performance of reinforced soil wall with untreated and cement-treated soils as backfill using a 1-g shaking table", Soils Found., 55(3), 626-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.04.013.
  32. Temur, R. and Bekdas, G. (2016), "Teaching learning-based optimization for design of cantilever retaining walls", Struct. Eng. Mech., 57(4): 763-783. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.4.763.
  33. Tricarico, M., Madabhushi, G.S.P. and Aversa, S. (2016), "Centrifuge modelling of flexible retaining walls subjected to dynamic loading", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 88, 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.06.013.
  34. Wang, K.L. and Lin, M.L. (2011), "Initiation and displacement of landslide induced by earthquake - a study of shaking table model slope test", Eng. Geol., 122, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.04.008.
  35. Xu, C., Xu, X.W., Yao, X. and Dai, F.C. (2014), "Three (nearly) complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis", Landslides, 11(3): 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6.
  36. Xu, X., Zhou, X.P., Huang, C.X. and Cu, L.Q. (2017), "Wedge-failure analysis of the seismic slope using the pseudo dynamic method", Int. J. Geomech., 17(12), 04017108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001015.
  37. Yang, C.W., Zhang, J.J., Fu, X., Zhu, C.B. and Bi, J.W. (2014), "Improvement of pseudo-static method for slope stability analysis", J. Mt. Sci-Engl., 11(3), 625-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2756-8.
  38. Yazdandoust, M. (2017), "Investigation on the seismic performance of steel-strip reinforced-soil retaining walls using shaking table test", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 97, 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.011.
  39. Yazdandoust, M. (2019a), "Shaking table modeling of MSE/soil nail hybrid retaining walls", Soils Found, 59(2): 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.05.013.
  40. Yazdandoust, M. (2019b), "Assessment of horizontal seismic coefficient for three different types of reinforced soil structure using physical and analytical modeling", Int J Geomech, 19(7): 04019070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001344.
  41. Zhou, X.P. and Cheng, H. (2014), "Stability analysis of three-dimensional seismic landslides using the rigorous limit equilibrium method", Eng. Geol., 174, 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.009.
  42. Zhou, X.P., Zhu, B.Z., Juang, C.H. and Wong, L.N.Y. (2019), "A stability analysis of a layered-soil slope based on random field", B. Eng. Geol. Environ., 78(4), 2611-2625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1266-x.