Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis of Robot Education Unit in the Practical Arts Textbooks According to 2015 Revised Curriculum

2015 개정 실과교과서의 로봇교육 체제 분석

  • Park, SunJu (Dept. of Computer Science Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
  • 박선주 (광주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2020.01.16
  • Accepted : 2020.02.20
  • Published : 2020.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, we analyzed the units related to robot education in the Practical Arts textbooks according to the 2015 revised curriculum. As a result, all textbooks had a common system of introduction, development, and organization, and all of them showed a similar flow. Learning objectives were presented in all textbooks, but no affective goals were presented except cognitive and functional goals. The contents of robot learning suggest the meaning and type of robots, the structure and sensors of robots, and the activities of making robots, but the contents of robot ethics, the production and activities of various robot works, and the use of robots in the problem solving process are not presented. The assembly robot and the infrared sensor are used in common, and it consists of presenting robot production and control training materials in experience activities and arranging units through evaluation, and the A, C, and F textbooks also provide the unit auxiliary data. In the future, it will be necessary to include the contents of robot ethics education centered on the design/manufacturer and user-oriented robot ethics such as the recognition of the limits of robots, the principles of using robots correctly, safety education, personal information and privacy protection.

본 논문에서는 2015 개정 실과교과서의 로봇 교육과 관련된 단원을 분석하였다. 분석결과, 모든 교과서는 도입, 전개, 정리의 공통 체제를 지니고 있었고, 모두 비슷한 흐름을 보이고 있었다. 학습목표는 모든 교과서에서 제시하고 있었으나, 인지, 기능적인 목표 이외에 정의적인 목표는 제시되지 않았다. 로봇 학습 내용은 로봇의 의미와 종류, 로봇의 구조와 센서, 로봇 만들기 활동을 제시하고 있으나 로봇 윤리, 다양한 로봇작품 제작 및 활동, 문제해결과정에서 로봇활용 등의 내용은 제시되지 않고 있다. 조립형 로봇과 적외선 센서를 공통으로 사용하고 있으며, 체험활동에 로봇제작 및 제어 실습자료 제시, 평가하기를 통한 단원 정리 등으로 구성되어 있으며, A, C, F교과서에서는 단원보조자료 등도 제시하고 있다. 추후 로봇 한계 인지, 올바른 사용 원칙, 안전교육, 개인정보 및 사생활보호 등의 설계·제조자와 사용자 중심의 로봇윤리 교육내용을 포함할 필요가 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. AhRong Kim, ChulHyun Lee(2015), The Analysis of "Understanding the Robot" In The Practical Arts Textbooks According to 2009 Revised Curriculum, Journal of Korean practical arts education 28(3), 143-160.
  2. ChulHyun Lee(2011), A Comparative Analysis of Information Unit Contents in 2007 Revised Practical Arts Textbooks, Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 17(20), 99-124.
  3. DongWon Lee, KyungTae Kim(2016), A Study on the Analysis of the Curriculum and Exploration of the Development Direction of Elementary School Technologies (Robot /Invention) Area in the 2015 Revised Practical Arts Curriculum, Journal of Korean practical arts education 22(2), 185-200.
  4. GyuWon Jo, JinHyun Jung(2019), Analysis on the Invention Education Unit in Elementary Practical Arts Subject, Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 25(4) 73-88. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2019.25.4.005
  5. HaNa Jung, YoungSeok Jhun,(2018), Analysis of Instruction Materials for Physical Computing from the Perspective of Computer and Information Literacy, Journal of Korean Association of information Education 22(4), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.4.473
  6. HyeJung Choi(2013), Development of Evaluation Criteria for Selection of Textbooks in Elementary School. Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Education.
  7. HyeongGyun Kim (2015), A Comparative Analysis of 'Comfortable Housing and Living Resources Management' in the revised textbooks, Korean Journal of Practical Arts Education, 28(4), 117-133.
  8. JeongRang Kim(2019), Analyzing contents of software education area shown in the 2015 revised elementary Practical Art textbook, Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 23(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.9
  9. Jiyun Kim, TaeWuk Lee(2018), Analysis of the Units on Software Education in Practical Arts Textbooks According to 2015 Revised National Curriculum for Preparing, The Conference of Korean association of computer education, 23-1.
  10. JoonSang Bae(2019), Analysis of the Units on Software Education in the Practical Arts of the Elementary School Textbooks According to 2015 Revised National Curriculum, Major in Elementary Science & Technology Education for Life, Graduate School of Education, Seoul National University of Education.
  11. JuHyun Park, JeongHye Han(2018), Development of Educational Contents in Robot Ethics for Elementary Students, Journal of Creative Information Culture 4(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.32823/jcic.4.2.201808.143
  12. KISEF(2017), SW Education Policy Research Report, Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
  13. Ministry of Education, The 2015 Revised National Curriculum, 2015.
  14. MyeongNam Kim, SunJu Park(2019), The Analysis of 'Software education' Unit in the Practical Arts Textbooks According to 2015 Revised Curriculum, Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 23(3), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.3.255
  15. MyungJoo Kim(2017), The Need for Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Trends at Home and Abroad, Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication Sciences 34(10), 45-54.
  16. SungHun Ahn, SangHyeon Lee(2019), Analysis of 2015 Revised SW Curriculum in Elementary and Middle School based on Core Competency, Journal of Creative Information Culture 5(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.32823/jcic.5.1.201904.63
  17. SunYong Byun(2018), A Study on the Ethical Guideline for Artificial Intelligence Robots, Journal of Korea Ethics Education Association 47, 233-252.
  18. YoungChan Lee, HeuiPil Kim(2017), The Analysis of Core Concepts in the Invention and Robot in the 2009 Revised Practical Arts Curriculum, Journal of Korean practical arts education 30(4), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.24062/kpae.2017.30.4.137