DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The efficacy of dermofat grafts from the groin for correction of acquired facial deformities

  • Choi, Min Hyub (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine) ;
  • He, Wei Jie (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University Graduate School of Medicine) ;
  • Son, Kyung Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Woo Young (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cheon, Ji Seon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.01.16
  • Accepted : 2020.04.16
  • Published : 2020.04.20

Abstract

Background: Posttraumatic acquired facial deformities require surgical treatment, with options including scar revision, fat grafts, implant insertion, and flap coverage. However, each technique has specific advantages and disadvantages. Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 13 patients (eight with scar contracture and five with a depressed scar) were treated using dermofat grafts from the groin. The harvested dermofat was then inserted into the undermined dead space after the contracture was released, and a bolster suture was done for fixation considering the patient's contour and asymmetry. A modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale and satisfaction survey were used to compare deformity improvements before and after surgery. Results: In most cases, effective volume correction and an aesthetically satisfactory contour were maintained well after dermofat grafting, without any major complications. In some cases, however, lipolysis proceeded rapidly when inflammation and infection were not completely eliminated. A significant difference was found in the modified Vancouver Scar Scale before and after surgery, with a p-value of 0.001. The average score on the satisfaction survey was 17.07 out of 20 points. Conclusion: A dermofat graft with the groin as the donor site can be considered as an effective surgical option that is the simplest and most cost-effective method for the treatment of acquired facial deformities with scar contracture.

Keywords

References

  1. Song B, Zhao J, Guo S, Yi C, Liu C, He L, et al. Repair of facial scars by the free expanded deltopectoral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:200e-208e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182789c02
  2. Pomahac B, Bueno EM, Sisk GC, Pribaz JJ. Current principles of facial allotransplantation: the Brigham and Women's Hospital Experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:1069-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865cd3
  3. Fagrell D, Enestrom S, Berggren A, Kniola B. Fat cylinder transplantation: an experimental comparative study of three different kinds of fat transplants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:90-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199607000-00014
  4. Honeybrook A, Athavale SM, Rangarajan SV, Rohde SL, Netterville JL. Free dermal fat graft reconstruction of the head and neck: an alternate reconstructive option. Am J Otolaryngol 2017;38:291-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.026
  5. Chiu DWT, Bradford WE. Repair and grafting of dermis, fat and fascia. In: McCarthy JC, editor. Plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 509-26.
  6. Little JW. Applications of the classic dermal fat graft in primary and secondary facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:788-804. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200202000-00060
  7. Yang SJ, Kim BS, Kim JH. Secondary augmentation rhinoplasty with dermofat graft. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;25:152-60.
  8. Hwang K, Han JY, Kim DJ. Dermofat graft in deep nasolabial fold and facial rhytidectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2003;27:254-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3026-x
  9. Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1634-42. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000180829.70036.4F
  10. Matarasso A, Levine SM. Evidence-based medicine: liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1697-705. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a807cf
  11. Guo L, Pribaz JJ. Clinical flap prefabrication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124(6 Suppl):e340-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bcf094
  12. Hwang K, Kim DJ, Lee IJ. An anatomic comparison of the skin of five donor sites for dermal fat graft. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:327-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200103000-00021
  13. Orgill DP, Ogawa R. Current methods of burn reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:827e-836e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828e2138
  14. Kokkoli E, Shih HS, Spyropoulou GA, Jeng SF. Local free-style perforator flaps in head and neck reconstruction: an update and a useful classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1863-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002163
  15. Lee KT, Mun GH. A systematic review of functional donor-site morbidity after latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:303-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000365
  16. Chen YC, Scaglioni MF, Carrillo Jimenez LE, Yang JC, Huang EY, Lin TS. Suprafascial anterolateral thigh flap harvest: a better way to minimize donor-site morbidity in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138:689-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002496
  17. Zhang YX, Hayakawa TJ, Levin LS, Hallock GG, Lazzeri D. The economy in autologous tissue transfer: part 1. the kiss flap technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1018-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000479971.99309.21

Cited by

  1. Reconstruction of Postburn Contracture and Deformity vol.10, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2020.1011374