Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nurses and Nursing Students' Recognition of Good Instruction

간호사와 간호대학생의 좋은 수업에 대한 인식

  • Park, Mina (The Graduate School of Clinical and Public Health Convergence, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Shin, Sujin (College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University)
  • 박민아 (이화여자대학교 임상보건융합대학원) ;
  • 신수진 (이화여자대학교 간호대학)
  • Received : 2019.02.26
  • Accepted : 2020.01.19
  • Published : 2020.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify and assess from nursing students and nurses in the clinical field what constitute good instruction, through the review of nursing students' opinions and clinical field demands. Methods: The study design was used Creswell's exploratory sequential design by collecting and analyzing qualitative data obtained from interviews and then analysis of quantitative data. The participations were 79 seniors in nursing schools and 85 nurses with less than three years of clinical experience. The data were collected through individual interviews and analyzed based on Elo and Kyngas's content analysis method. The quantitative data were collected using the questionnaire developed based on qualitative results and analyzed by SPSS 23.0 program and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Results: The results showed that IPA extracted seven items with high importance but low satisfaction: "nursing fads and trends," "teacher-learner communication and reflection," "materials used in clinical settings such as monitoring results and test results," "special presentations by experienced practitioners," "instruction assures learners' comprehension," "accurate and detailed evaluation standards" and "feedback on homework and exam." Conclusion: The factors comprising good instruction were verified, and the necessity for additional efforts to improve high importance and low performance factors was noted. Therefore, this study can serve as a guide for nursing education facilities and educators in developing of a thorough education system with excellent instruction designed to achieve an ideal nursing education.

Keywords

References

  1. Pagnucci N, Carnevale FA, Bagnasco A, Tolotti A, Cadorin L, Sasso L. A cross-sectional study of pedagogical strategies in nursing education: Opportunities and constraints toward using effective pedagogy. BMC Medical Education. 2015;15:138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0411-5
  2. Committee on The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative; Institute of Medicine. Future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2010. p. 1-700.
  3. Kim JA, Chu MS, Kwon KJ, Seo HK, Lee SN. Core competencies for new nurses. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2017;23(1):40-53. https://doi.org/10.22650/JKCNR.2017.23.1.40
  4. Numminen O, Laine T, Isoaho H, Hupli M, Leino-Kilpi H, Meretoja R. Do educational outcomes correspond with the requirements of nursing practice: Educators' and managers' assessments of novice nurses' professional competence. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2014;28(4):812-821. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12115
  5. Sin KM, Kim EY. A concept analysis on reality shock in newly graduated nurses using the hybrid model. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing. 2017;26(1):19-29. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2017.26.1.19
  6. Kumaran S, Carney M. Role transition from student nurse to staff nurse: Facilitating the transition period. Nurse Education in Practice. 2014;14(6):605-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.002
  7. Kajander-Unkuri S, Meretoja R, Katajisto J, Saarikoski M, Salminen L, Suhonen R, et al. Self-assessed level of competence of graduating nursing students and factors related to it. Nurse Education Today. 2014;34(5):795-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.009
  8. Scully NJ. The theory-practice gap and skill acquisition: An issue for nursing education. Collegian. 2011;18(2):93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2010.04.002
  9. Yune SJ, Lee YN, Lee SS. An analysis of undergraduate student essays on good instruction. The Journal of Korean Education. 2009;36(4):125-149.
  10. Alves PF. Vygotsky and Piaget: Scientific concepts. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2014;7(3):24-34. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2014.0303
  11. Schunk DH. Learning theories: An educational perspective. Noh SJ, Choi BY, Cha HJ, Jang KW, Oh JE, So HJ, translators. Paju: Academypress; 2016. p. 1-686.
  12. Choi SH. Analysis on the characteristics of good teaching perceived by junior college student: Based on a case study of K college. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2014;14(8):517-527. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.517
  13. Waltz CF, Jenkins LS, Han N. The use and effectiveness of active learning methods in nursing and health professions education: A literature review. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2014;35(6):392-400. https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1168
  14. Kim YM, Park H. Current trends of teaching-learning methods in Korean undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2016;16(3):945-966. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.11.945
  15. Berman AC. Good teaching is good teaching: A narrative review for effective medical educators. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2015;8(4):386-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1535
  16. Johnson-Farmer B, Frenn M. Teaching excellence: What great teachers teach us. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2009;25(5):267-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.020
  17. Stronge JH. Effective teachers=student achievement: What the research says. New York: Routledge; 2013. p. 1-192.
  18. Park KJ, Ryu CR, Choi J, Jung HC. An analysis on the science gifted education recipients' perception for education program using an importance-performance analysis. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education. 2016;26(3):427-447. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2016.26.3.427
  19. Creswell JW. Research design. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2014. p. 1-273.
  20. Yu PS, Kim ES, Kim HK, Lee SH, Hyoung HK, Eom AY, et al. The perception degree of teaching effectiveness of nurses and nursing students on clinical nursing practicum. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2008;14(3):311-320.
  21. Kwon SY. Teachers’ conceptions of good teaching in secondary school: The analysis of importance and performance. Journal of Educational Technology. 2010;26(1):185-215. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.26.1.185
  22. Seo KH, Yoo SY. The good instructional practice from teachers’, students’ and parents’ perspectives. Korean Journal of Educational Research. 2004;42(4):285-315.
  23. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;62(1):107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  24. Good TL, Brophy JE. Looking in classrooms. 10th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson Education; 2008. p. 1-528.
  25. Ahn JH. A qualitative study on characteristics of "good" college classes in the humanities and social sciences courses [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2012. p. 1-210.
  26. Choi SH, Ahn HJ. Investigating the requirements of good teaching from medical students' perspectives. Korean Medical Education Review. 2016;18(3):156-166. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2016.18.3.156
  27. Hwang JI, Yoon TY, Jin HJ, Park Y, Park JY, Lee BJ. Patient safety competence for final-year health professional students: Perceptions of effectiveness of an interprofessional education course. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2016;30(6):732-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1218446
  28. Shakman L, Renu G, Obeidat A. Inter professional education in health care. International Journal of Nursing Education. 2013;5(1):86-91. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-9357.5.1.021
  29. Kim KH, Hwang E, Shin S. Current status and future direction of interprofessional education in nursing education. Korean Medical Education Review. 2017;19(1):18-24. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2017.19.1.18
  30. Kwon YS. An analysis of factors of effective lecturing behaviors in university class [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2006. p. 1-176.
  31. Tomlinson CA, McTighe J. Integrating differentiated instruction & understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Kim GJ, On JD, Jang SB, translators. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2013. p. 1-298.
  32. Arkan B, Ordin Y, Yilmaz D. Undergraduate nursing students’ experience related to their clinical learning environment and factors affecting to their clinical learning process. Nurse Education in Practice. 2018;29:127-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.12.005
  33. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Medical Education. 2010;44(1):101-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x

Cited by

  1. 간호대학생의 좋은 수업 경험이 문제해결능력에 미치는 영향: 자기조절학습능력의 매개효과를 중심으로 vol.26, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2020.26.2.185
  2. 하브루타 교수법을 적용한 수업이 간호대학생의 의사소통능력, 비판적 사고능력 및 셀프리더십에 미치는 효과 vol.31, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2020.31.3.337
  3. 성인간호학의 실시간 온라인 수업에 대한 학습만족도 영향요인 vol.22, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2021.22.3.80
  4. 온택트 시대의 졸업학년 간호대학생이 경험한 온라인 비대면 성인간호학실습에 대한 내용분석 vol.22, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2021.22.4.195
  5. COVID-19 대유행 이후 간호대학생의 온라인 학습 만족도 예측요인 vol.19, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2021.19.7.451
  6. 혼합현실 기반 중증외상 처치 시뮬레이션 교육 요구 조사: 군병원 간호사 대상 포커스 그룹 인터뷰 적용 vol.27, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2021.27.4.423