DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of seismic performance factors for tension-only braced frames

  • Shariati, Mahdi (Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University) ;
  • Lagzian, Majid (Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology) ;
  • Maleki, Shervin (Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology) ;
  • Shariati, Ali (Division of Computational Mathematics and Engineering, Institute for Computational Science, Ton Duc Thang University) ;
  • Trung, Nguyen Thoi (Division of Computational Mathematics and Engineering, Institute for Computational Science, Ton Duc Thang University)
  • Received : 2019.03.03
  • Accepted : 2019.11.01
  • Published : 2020.05.25

Abstract

The tension-only braced frames (TOBFs) are widely used as a lateral force resisting system (LFRS) in low-rise steel buildings due to their simplicity and economic advantage. However, the system has poor seismic energy dissipation capacity and pinched hysteresis behavior caused by early buckling of slender bracing members. The main concern in utilizing the TOBF system is the determination of appropriate performance factors for seismic design. A formalized approach to quantify the seismic performance factor (SPF) based on determining an acceptable margin of safety against collapse is introduced by FEMA P695. The methodology is applied in this paper to assess the SPFs of the TOBF systems. For this purpose, a trial value of the R factor was first employed to design and model a set of TOBF archetype structures. Afterwards, the level of safety against collapse provided by the assumed R factor was investigated by using the non-linear analysis procedure of FEMA P695 comprising incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) under a set of prescribed ground motions. It was found that the R factor of 3.0 is appropriate for safe design of TOBFs. Also, the system overstrength factor (Ω0) was estimated as 2.0 by performing non-linear static analyses.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC (2010), "Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings", Am. Inst. Steel Constr., 44(1), 3.
  2. Balendra, T. and Huang, X. (2003), "Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950", J. Struct. Eng., 129(8), 1019-1035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019)
  3. Chen, C.H. and Mahin, S. (2010), "Seismic collapse performance of concentrically steel braced frames", Structures Congress 2010.
  4. Chen, C., Shi, L., Shariati, M., Toghroli, A., Mohamad, E.T., Bui, D.T. and Khorami, M. (2019), Behavior of steel storage pallet racking connection-A review.
  5. Committee, A. (2010), "Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10)", American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago-Illinois.
  6. Council, A.T. and Agency, U.S.F.E.M. (2009), Quantification of building seismic performance factors, US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA.
  7. Council, A.T. and California, S.E.A.o. (1978), Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings: a cooperative effort with the design professions, building code interests, and the research community, Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
  8. Engineers, A.S.o.C. (1994), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Amer Society of Civil Engineers.
  9. Engineers, A.S.o.C. (2014), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-13), American Society of Civil Engineers.
  10. Filiatrault, A. and Tremblay, R. (1998), "Design of tension-only concentrically braced steel frames for seismic induced impact loading", Eng. Struct., 20(12), 1087-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00205-8
  11. Hsiao, P.C., Lehman, D.E. and Roeder, C.W. (2013), "Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 42(10), 1547-1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2286.
  12. Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2005), "Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames", Eng. Struct., 27(2), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009.
  13. Kircher, C., Deierlein, G., Hooper, J., Krawinkler, H., Mahin, S., Shing, B. and Wallace, J. (2010), Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors.
  14. Li, D., Toghroli, A., Shariati, M., Sajedi, F., Bui, D.T., Kianmehr, P., Mohamad, E.T. and Khorami, M. (2019), "Application of polymer, silica-fume and crushed rubber in the production of Pervious concrete", Smart Struct. Syst., 23(2), 207-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.23.2.207.
  15. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994), "Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design", Earthq. Spectra, 10(2), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778.
  16. Naghipour, M., Yousofizinsaz, G. and Shariati, M. (2020), "Experimental study on axial compressive behavior of welded built-up CFT stub columns made by cold-formed sections with different welding lines", Steel Compos. Struct., 34(3), 347-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.3.347.
  17. Shah, S.N.R., Ramli Sulong, N.H., Khan, R., Jumaat, M.Z. and Shariati, M. (2016), "Behavior of industrial steel rack connections", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 70-71, 725-740. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.026.
  18. Shariati, M., Mafipour, M.S., Mehrabi, P., Ahmadi, M., Wakil, K., Trung, N.T. and Toghroli, A. (2020), "Prediction of concrete strength in presence of furnace slag and fly ash using Hybrid ANN-GA (Artificial Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm)", Smart Struct. Syst., 25(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.2.183.
  19. Shariati, M., Rafie, S., Zandi, Y., Fooladvand, R., Gharehaghaj, B., Mehrabi, P., Shariat, A., Trung, N.T., Salih, M.N. and Poi-Ngian, S. (2019a), "Experimental investigation on the effect of cementitious materials on fresh and mechanical properties of self-consolidating concrete", Adv. Concrete Constr., 8(3), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2019.8.3.225.
  20. Shariati, M., Tahir, M., Wee, T.C., Shah, S., Jalali, A., Abdullahi, M.a.M. and Khorami, M. (2018), "Experimental investigations on monotonic and cyclic behavior of steel pallet rack connections", Eng. Fail. Anal., 85, 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.08.014.
  21. Shariati, M., Trung, N.T., Wakil, K., Mehrabi, P., Safa, M. and Khorami, M. (2019b), "Moment-rotation estimation of steel rack connection using extreme learning machine", Steel Compos. Struct., 31(5), 427-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.5.427.
  22. Sinaei, H., Jumaat, M.Z. and Shariati, M. (2011), "Numerical investigation on exterior reinforced concrete Beam-Column joint strengthened by composite fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)", Int. J. Phys. Sci., 6(28), 6572-6579.
  23. Taheri, E., Firouzianhaji, A., Usefi, N., Mehrabi, P., Ronagh, H. and Samali, B. (2019), "Investigation of a Method for Strengthening Perforated Cold-Formed Steel Profiles under Compression Loads", Appl. Sci., 9(23), 5085. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235085.
  24. Toghroli, A., Shariati, M., Karim, M.R. and Ibrahim, Z. (2017), "Investigation on composite polymer and silica fume-rubber aggregate pervious concrete", Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Civil, Structural and Mechanical Engineering - CSM 2017, Zurich, Switzerland.
  25. Tremblay, R. and Filiatrault, A. (1996), "Seismic impact loading in inelastic tension-only concentrically braced steel frames: myth or reality?", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 25(12), 1373-1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199612)25:12<1373::AID-EQE615>3.0.CO;2-Y.
  26. Xu, C., et al. (2019), "Using genetic algorithms method for the paramount design of reinforced concrete structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 71(5), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.71.5.503.
  27. Zareian, F., Lignos, D. and Krawinkler, H. (2010), "Evaluation of seismic collapse performance of steel special moment resisting frames using FEMA P695 (ATC-63) methodology", Structures Congress 2010.

Cited by

  1. Influence of porosity and cement grade on concrete mechanical properties vol.10, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2020.10.5.393
  2. Prediction of total sediment load: A case study of Wadi Arbaat in eastern Sudan vol.26, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.26.6.781
  3. Knowledge-Based Prediction of Load-Carrying Capacity of RC Flat Slab through Neural Network and FEM vol.2021, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4528945
  4. Experimental study on the effects of physical conditions on the interaction between debris flow and baffles vol.33, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0046670
  5. Optimization algorithms for composite beam as smart active control of structures using genetic algorithms vol.27, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.27.6.1041
  6. Computer simulation for stability performance of sandwich annular system via adaptive tuned deep learning neural network optimization vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2021.11.1.083
  7. Analyzing shear strength of steel-concrete composite beam with angle connectors at elevated temperature using finite element method vol.40, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.40.6.853