DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nursing students' experiences in virtual simulation practice

간호대학생의 가상 시뮬레이션 실습 경험

  • 김윤정 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 간호과학과) ;
  • 김원정 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 간호과학과) ;
  • 민혜영 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 간호과학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.30
  • Accepted : 2020.05.20
  • Published : 2020.05.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the meaning of nursing students' experiences in virtual simulation practice. Methods: The participants were six nursing students who have experience in a virtual simulation. Data were collected from August to September 2019 through a focus group interview. Giorgi's phenomenological method was used for analysis. Results: The study results revealed 3 constituents and 6 sub-constituents that are essential for nursing student's experiences in a virtual simulation. The three constituents were: "Chaos in the virtual reality", "The process of adjusting to chaos", and "Becoming an independent nurse in a safe virtual reality". Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the following suggestions are made. Results suggest the development of virtual simulations in Korean, the use of simulations as a group activity first, and the use of simulation between lecture and practice or in the regular curriculum. The results of the study can be used as primary data for providing virtual simulation in nursing education.

Keywords

References

  1. Abelsson, A. (2019). Anxiety caused by simulated prehospital emergency care. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 29, 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.02.004.
  2. Bradbury-Jones, C., Sambrook, S., & Irvine, F. (2009). The phenomenological focus group: An oxymoron? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(3), 663-671. https://10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04922.x
  3. Carlson-Sabelli, L., Gidden, J. F., Fogg, L., & Fiedler, R. A. (2011). Challenges and benefits of using a virtual community to explore nursing concepts among baccalaureate nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.2136
  4. Choi, S. H., & Won, J. S. (2017). The nature of flow in virtual reality education: Based on a grounded theory approach. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(11), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.11.446
  5. Cobbett, S., & Snelgrove-Clarke, E. (2016). Virtual versus face-to-face clinical simulation in relation to student knowledge, anxiety, and self-confidence in maternal-newborn nursing: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Education Today, 45, 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.004
  6. Cooper, S., Cant, R. P., Bogossian, F., Bucknall, T., & Hopmans, R. (2015). Doing the right thing at the right time: Assessing responses to patient deterioration in electronic simulation scenarios using course-of-action analysis. Computer Informatics Nursing, 33(5), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000141
  7. Cooper, S. J., Hopmans, R., Cant, R. P., Bogossian, F., Giannis, A., & King, R. (2017). Deteriorating patients: Global reach and impact of an e-simulation program. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(11), 562-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.06.004
  8. Duff, E., Miller, L., & Bruce, J. (2016). Online virtual simulation and diagnostic reasoning: A scoping review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(9), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.001
  9. Foronda, C. L., Hudson, K. W., & Budhathoki, C. (2017). Use of virtual simulation to impact nursing students' cognitive and affective knowledge of evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(2), 168-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12207
  10. Frick, K. D., Swoboda, S. M., Mansukhani, K., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). An economic model for clinical simulation in prelicensure nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(3), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30053-3
  11. Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
  12. Hancock, P. A., Vincenzi, D. A., Wise, J. A., & Mouloua, M. (2008). Human Factors in Simulation and Training. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  13. Hooper, C. R., Jivram, T., Law, S., Michell, A., & Somasunderam, A. (2012). Using virtual patients to teach medical ethics, medical law and medical professionalism. Medical Teacher, 34(8), 674-675. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.689450
  14. Kang, J., & Suh, E. E. (2018). Development and evaluation of "chronic illness care smartphone apps" on nursing students' knowledge, self-efficacy, and learning experience. Computer Informatics Nursing, 36(11), 550-559. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000447
  15. Kim, K. A., & Choi, D. (2018). The effect of virtual simulation in nursing education: An application of care for acute heart disease patients. Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing, 6(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17333/JKSSN.2018.6.2.1
  16. Kim, Y., Kim, J., Kim, H., Park, S., So, S., Jung, B., et al. (2017). Opinions and perceptions on allowing nursing students' practice among inpatients at a university hospital. Perspectives in Nursing Science, 14(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.16952/pns.2017.14.1.10
  17. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. (2017). Accreditation standards of Bachelor and associate degree in nursing program. Seoul: Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education.
  18. Lee, J. S., & Ryu, Y. S. (2012). New Educational Methodology. Seoul: HakYiDang.
  19. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  20. Lofmark, A., & Wikblad, K. (2001). Facilitating and obstructing factors for development of learning in clinical practice: A student perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.3411739.x
  21. Lopreiato, J. (2016). Healthcare Simulation Dictionary. Retrieved August 8, 2019, from https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/research/simulation_dictionary/sim-dictionary.pdf
  22. McGovern, K. (1994). Applications of virtual reality to surgery. British Medical Journal, 308(6936), 1054. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6936.1054a
  23. Padilha, J. M., Machado, P. P., Ribeiro, A., Ramos, J., & Costa, P. (2019). Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e11529. https://doi.org/10.2196/11529
  24. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
  25. Smith, S. J., Farra, S., Ulrich, D. L., Hodgson, E., Nicely, S., & Matcham, W. (2016). Learning and retention using virtual reality in a decontamination simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(4), 210-214. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000035
  26. Song, J., & Kim, M. (2013). Study on clinical education for nursing in hospitals in Korea. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 19(2), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.2.251
  27. Tjoflat, I., Brandeggen, T. K., Strandberg, E. S., Dyrstad, D. N., & Husebo, S. E. (2018). Norwegian nursing students' evaluation of $vSim^{(R)}$ for Nursing. Advances in Simulation, 3(1), 10. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s41077-018-0070-9
  28. Verkuyl, M., & Hughes, M. (2019). Virtual gaming simulation in nursing education: A mixed-methods study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 29, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.02.001
  29. Wong, F. M. F. (2018). A phenomenological research study: Perspectives of student learning through small group work between undergraduate nursing students and educators. Nurse Education Today, 68, 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.013

Cited by

  1. Development and application of Scenario-based Admission Management VR contents for nursing students vol.26, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2021.26.01.209
  2. 몰입형 가상현실 시뮬레이션 프로그램의 효과: 메타분석 vol.12, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2021.12.3.381
  3. 온택트 시대의 졸업학년 간호대학생이 경험한 온라인 비대면 성인간호학실습에 대한 내용분석 vol.22, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2021.22.4.195
  4. An Integrative Review of Simulation Programs for Nursing Students: Patient and Caregiver-Centered Communication vol.29, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2021.29.3.168
  5. Effects of Nursing Simulation Using Mixed Reality: A Scoping Review vol.9, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080947
  6. 간호대학생의 Virtual 시뮬레이션 실습 및 High fidelity 시뮬레이션 실습교육 경험 분석: 혼합연구방법 적용 vol.27, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2021.27.3.227
  7. 혼합현실 기반 중증외상 처치 시뮬레이션 교육 요구 조사: 군병원 간호사 대상 포커스 그룹 인터뷰 적용 vol.27, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2021.27.4.423