Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in cereal grains and co-products in growing pigs

  • Lee, Su A (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Ahn, Jong Young (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Son, Ah Reum (Monogastric Animal Feed Research Institute, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Beob Gyun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2019.05.28
  • Accepted : 2019.10.30
  • Published : 2020.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA) in cereal grains and various co-products fed to growing pigs. Methods: Ten feed ingredients tested were barley (9.3% CP), lupin kernels (31.1% CP), and wheat (11.3% CP) as cereal grains, and 2 sources of corn gluten feed produced in China (21.6% CP) and Korea (24.6% CP), corn gluten meal (65.3% CP), lupin hulls (11.6% CP), rice bran (14.5% CP), soybean meal (44.8% CP), and wheat bran (15.4% CP) as co-products. Ten experimental diets were formulated to contain each ingredient as a sole source of N and an N-free diet was used to correct basal endogenous losses of CP and AA. All diets also contained 0.5% Cr2O3 as an indigestible index. A replicated 11×6 incomplete Latin square design with 11 dietary treatments, 6 periods, and 22 animals was employed. Twenty-two barrows with an initial body weight of 64.6±4.9 kg were equipped with a T-cannula in the distal ileum. An experimental period consisted of a 4-d adaptation period and a 2-d collection period. Results: The SID of CP in the barley, lupin kernels, wheat, 2 sources of corn gluten feed, corn gluten meal, lupin hulls, rice bran, soybean meal, and wheat bran were 84.7%, 90.5%, 90.4%, 77.4%, 74.6%, 89.5%, 90.4%, 74.4%, 86.9%, and 63.4% (standard error of the mean [SEM] = 5.3, p = 0.006), respectively. The respective SID values of Lys were 75.5%, 88.4%, 83.9%, 74.7%, 62.4%, 80.3%, 83.9%, 78.5%, 88.0%, and 71.2% (SEM = 3.3, p<0.001), and the SID values of Met were 83.6%, 88.7%, 89.4%, 85.7%, 78.3%, 88.9%, 89.4%, 85.3%, 91.1%, and 77.0% (SEM = 2.4, p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids varies among the feed ingredients fed to pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:917-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02
  2. Stein HH, Pedersen C, Wirt AR, Bohlke RA. Additivity of values for apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in mixed diets fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2005;83:2387-95. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83102387x
  3. Xue PC, Ragland D, Adeola O. Determination of additivity of apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in diets containing multiple protein sources fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:3937-44. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7815
  4. Lee SA, Jo H, Kong C, Kim BG. Use of digestible rather than total amino acid in diet formulation increases nitrogen retention and reduces nitrogen excretion from pigs. Livest Sci 2017;197:8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.013
  5. Stein HH, Seve B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CFM. Invited review: Amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: Terminology and application. J Anim Sci 2007;85:172-80. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-742
  6. NRC. Committee on nutrient requirements of swine. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2012.
  7. Son AR, Hyun Y, Htoo JK, Kim BG. Amino acid digestibility in copra expellers and palm kernel expellers by growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;187:91-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.09.015
  8. Liu JD, Li QY, Zeng ZK, et al. Determination and prediction of the amino acid digestibility of sunflower seed meals in growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:86-94. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0109
  9. Kim BG, Stein HH. A spreadsheet program for making a balanced Latin Square design. Rev Colom Cienc Pecu 2009; 22:591-6.
  10. Stein HH, Shipley CF, Easter RA. Technical note: A technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1433-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651433x
  11. NRC. Committee on nutrient requirements of swine. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1998.
  12. Horwitz W, Latimer GW. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2005.
  13. Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. 2nd ed. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004.
  14. Stein HH, Lagos LV, Casas GA. Nutritional value of feed ingredients of plant origin fed to pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;218:33-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016. 05.003
  15. Casas GA, Almeida JAS, Stein HH. Amino acid digestibility in rice co-products fed to growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2015;207:150-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015. 05.024
  16. Fernandez JA, Batterham ES. The nutritive value of lupin-seed and dehulled lupin-seed meals as protein sources for growing pigs as evaluated by different techniques. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1995;53:279-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00743-S
  17. Kil DY, Park CS, Son AR, Ji SY, Kim BG. Digestibility of crude protein and amino acids in corn grains from different origins for pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;196:68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.06.008
  18. Park CS, Oh SI, Kim BG. Prediction of basal endogenous losses of amino acids based on body weight and feed intake in pigs fed nitrogen-free diets. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua 2013;26:186-92.
  19. Stein HH, Trottier NL, Bellaver C, Easter RA. The effect of feeding level and physiological status on total flow and amino acid composition of endogenous protein at the distal ileum in swine. J Anim Sci 1999;77:1180-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7751180x
  20. Cervantes-Pahm SK, Liu Y, Evans A, Stein HH. Effect of novel fiber ingredients on ileal and total tract digestibility of energy and nutrients in semi-purified diets fed to growing pigs. J Sci Food Agric 2014;94:1284-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6405
  21. Park CS, Helmbrecht A, Htoo JK, Adeola O. Comparison of amino acid digestibility in full-fat soybean, two soybean meals, and peanut flour between broiler chickens and growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2017;95:3110-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017. 1404
  22. Son AR, Park CS, Park KR, Kim BG. Amino acid digestibility in plant protein sources fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2019;32:1745-52. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19. 0037
  23. Brestensky M, Nitrayova S, Patras P, Heger J. Standardized ileal digestibilities of amino acids and nitrogen in rye, barley, soybean meal, malt sprouts, sorghum, wheat germ and broken rice fed to growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013;186:120-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.09.006
  24. Wang HL, Shi M, Xu X, Ma XK, Liu L, Piao XS. Comparative energy content and amino acid digestibility of barley obtained from diverse sources fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:999-1005. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16. 0775
  25. Eklund M, Rademacher M, Sauer WC, Blank R, Mosenthin R. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in alfalfa meal, sugar beet pulp, and wheat bran compared to wheat and protein ingredients for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:1037-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6436
  26. Wang T, Osho SO, Adeola O. Additivity of apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acid determined by chromic oxide and titanium dioxide in mixed diets containing wheat and multiple protein sources fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2018;96:4731-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky326
  27. Almeida FN, Petersen GI, Stein HH. Digestibility of amino acids in corn, corn coproducts, and bakery meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2011;89:4109-15. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4143
  28. Ji Y, Zuo L, Wang FL, Li DF, Lai CH. Nutritional value of 15 corn gluten meals for growing pigs: chemical composition, energy content and amino acid digestibility. Arch Anim Nutr 2012;66:283-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2012.70 2466
  29. Loy DD, Lundy EL. Chapter 23 - Nutritional properties and feeding value of corn and its coproducts. In: Serna-Saldivar SO, editor. Corn (Third ed). Oxford, UK: AACC International Press; 2019. p. 633-59.
  30. Huang C, Ma D, Zang J, et al. Effect of keratinase on ileal amino acid digestibility in five feedstuffs fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:1946-55. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0815
  31. Kaufmann C, Sauer WC, Cervantes M, et al. Amino acid and energy digestibility in different sources of rice bran for growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci 2005;85:355-63. https://doi.org/10.4141/A04-084
  32. Kil DY, Stein HH. Dietary soybean oil and choice white grease improve apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in swine diets containing corn, soybean meal, and distillers dried grains with solubles. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua 2011;24:248-53.
  33. Schulze H, Van leeuwen P, Verstegen MWA, Huisman J, Souffrant WB, Ahrens F. Effect of level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal apparent digestibility and ileal nitrogen losses in pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:2362-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7292362x

Cited by

  1. Comprehensive overview of the quality of plant‐ And animal‐sourced proteins based on the digestible indispensable amino acid score vol.8, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1809
  2. Use of the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay to determine standardized amino acid digestibility, true metabolizable energy content, and digestible indispensable amino acid scores of plant-based vol.5, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab025
  3. Addition of hydrochloric acid to collection bags or collection containers did not change basal endogenous losses or ileal digestibility of amino acid in corn, soybean meal, or wheat middlings fed to g vol.34, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0838