DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Operational Design Domain for Testing of Autonomous Shuttle on Arterial Road

도시부 자율주행셔틀 실증을 위한 운행설계영역 분석: 안양시를 중심으로

  • Kim, Hyungjoo (Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology) ;
  • Lim, Kyungil (Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology) ;
  • Kim, Jaehwan (Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology) ;
  • Son, Woongbee (Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology)
  • 김형주 (차세대융합기술연구원 경기도자율주행센터) ;
  • 임경일 (차세대융합기술연구원 경기도자율주행센터) ;
  • 김재환 (차세대융합기술연구원 경기도자율주행센터) ;
  • 손웅비 (차세대융합기술연구원 경기도자율주행센터)
  • Received : 2020.03.05
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.04.30

Abstract

The ongoing development of autonomous driving-related technology may cause different kinds of accidents while testing new changes. As a result, more information on ODD suitable for the domestic road environment will be necessary to prevent safety accidents. Besides, implementation of the Autonomous Vehicle Act will increase autonomous driving demonstrations on roads currently in use. This study describes an ODD for demonstrating an autonomous driving shuttle in downtown areas. It addresses a possible scenario of autonomous driving around a downtown road in Anyang. Geometric, operational, and environmental factors are considered while maintaining a domestic road environment and safety. Autonomous driving shuttles are demonstrated in 30 nodes, each identified by node type and signal-communication. Link criteria are an autonomous driving restriction in 42 morning peak (8-9am) hours, 39 non-peak (12-13pm) hours, and 40 afternoon peak (18-19pm) hours. In the future, conclusions may be considered for preliminary safety assessments of roads where autonomous driving tests are performed.

현재 진행되고 있는 자율주행 관련 기술 발전은 실제 도로를 사용한 자율주행 테스트 시 다양한 안전사고가 발생할 가능성이 존재한다. 특히 자율주행자동차법 시행으로 실제 도로에서의 자율주행 실증은 증가할 것이며, 안전사고 예방을 위해 국내 도로환경에 적합한 운행설계영역에 대한 연구가 요구된다. 따라서 본 연구는 도심부 자율주행셔틀 실증을 위한 운행설계영역을 정의하고, 안양시 도심부도로를 중심으로 자율주행 운행 가능여부 등의 운행설계영역 평가를 실시한다. 본 연구의 자율주행 운행설계영역은 국내의 도로환경과 안전을 우선적으로 고려하였으며, 기하구조적 요인, 운영적 요인, 환경적 요인을 포함한다. 분석결과 노드기준에서는 노드유형 및 신호-통신 여부를 통해서 30개 노드에서 자율주행셔틀 실증이 가능한 것으로 분석되었다. 링크기준에서는 오전첨두(8-9시) 42개, 비첨두(12-13시) 39개, 그리고 오후첨두(18-19시) 40개 방향별 링크구간에서 자율주행 제한으로 분석되었다. 본 연구결과는 향후 자율주행 실증테스트가 이루어지는 도심부도로에서 사전 안전성 평가의 수범사례로 활용될 가치가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aurora(2019), The Auto X Safety Factor, Democratizing Autonomy.
  2. Auto X.(2018), The New Era of Mobility.
  3. Fahrenkrog F., Wang L., Platzer T., Fries A., Raisch F. and Kompass K.(2019), "Prospective effectiveness safety assessment of automated driving functions - From the method to the results," In 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.
  4. Feig P., Labenski V., Leonhardt T. and Schatz J.(2019), "Assessment of technical requirements for level 3 and beyond automated driving systems based on naturalistic driving and accident data analysis," In 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.
  5. Ford(2018), A Matter of Trust, Ford's approach to developing self-driving vehicles.
  6. Laura F., Marjory S., James M. and Anderson N.(2018), Measuring Automated Vehicle Safety: Forging a Framework, RAND Corporation.
  7. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs(2013), Highway Capacity Manual.
  8. NHTSA(2016), Federal Automated Vehicles Policy.
  9. NHTSA(2017), Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety.
  10. NHTSA(2018), A Framework for Automated Driving System Testable Cases and Scenarios.
  11. SAE(2018), Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related of Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles.
  12. Wagner M.(2017), "Systematic and Data-Driven Approaches to Autonomous Vehicle Testing and Certification," TR Circular E-C232: Automated Vehicles Symposium.
  13. Waymo(2017), Safety Report on the road to fully self-driving.