Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploration for Direction of the Curriculum Development through the Analysis of Media Information Literacy Competencies and Contents

미디어정보 리터러시 역량과 교육내용 분석을 통한 교육과정 개발 방향 탐구

  • 박주현 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2020.05.26
  • Accepted : 2020.06.22
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to obtain basic information and implications for developing media information literacy curriculum by comparing and analyzing UNESCO's media and information literacy competencies and AASL's key competencies with the 2015 Revised Curriculum and the Library and Information Life curriculum. As a result of the analysis, First, UNESCO's MIL and AASL's key competencies in media information literacy were related to the competencies of the 2015 Revised Curriculum. Second, UNESCO's MIL included more aspects of the composition and competencies of information literacy than media literacy. For this reason, it could be said that media information literacy more appropriately reflects the content pursued by media literacy education than media literacy. Third, UNESCO's MIL included more training content for media literacy than information literacy. Fourth, the contents of media literacy were found to be insufficient in the Library and Information Life curriculum compared to the education contents of library and information literacy. Fifth, the competency standards related to media information literacy and Libraries and Information Life did not present cultural sensitivity competency. Based on the results of the study, It is necessary to develop a media information literacy curriculum that fuses the contents of media literacy beyond the information literacy that use library resources.

본 연구의 목적은 UNESCO의 미디어와 정보 리터러시(MIL)의 역량과 교육내용, AASL의 미디어정보 리터러시의 핵심역량을 2015 개정 교육과정의 역량과 도서관과 정보생활의 교육내용과 비교하고 분석하여 미디어정보 리터러시 교육과정 개발에 필요한 기초 정보와 시사점을 획득하는 것이다. 분석결과, 첫째, UNESCO의 MIL과 AASL의 미디어정보 리터러시의 역량들은 2015 개정 교육과정의 역량과 연관성이 있었다. 둘째, UNESCO의 MIL은 미디어 리터러시보다 정보 리터러시의 구성 요인과 역량을 많이 반영하였다. 이러한 이유로 미디어정보 리터러시가 미디어 리터러시보다 미디어 리터러시 교육이 추구하는 내용을 보다 적절히 반영하고 있는 용어라 할 수 있었다. 셋째, UNESCO의 MIL은 정보 리터러시보다 미디어 리터러시의 교육내용을 보다 많이 반영하였다. 넷째, 도서관과 정보생활 교육과정은 도서관과 정보 리터러시 교육내용을 담아내고 있는 것에 비하여 미디어 리터러시 내용은 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 다섯째, 미디어정보 리터러시 관련 역량들과 도서관과 정보생활은 문화적 감수성 역량을 제시하고 있지 않았다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 도서관 자원을 활용하는 정보 리터러시의 역량을 넘어 미디어 리터러시의 내용을 융합한 미디어정보 리터러시 교육과정을 개발할 필요가 있음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, J. S., Bae, H. S., Kim, J. Y., Park, Y. S., & Yeom J. H. (2019). A study on the improvement of citizen competencies through the operation of media literacy curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  2. Ministry of Education (2015). Ministry of education notification no. 2015-74, general theory of curriculum from the elementary and secondary school and curriculum of each subject.
  3. Ministry of Education (2019). A plan to support internalization of school media education. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  4. 국정기획자문위원회 (2017). 100대 국정과제 목록. Retrieved from http://www.korea.kr/common/download.do?tblKey=EDN&fileId=211947
  5. Kim, Sung-Jun (2011). A study on the development of information literacy textbook. School Library and Information Literacy, 42(3), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271
  6. Kim, Yang-Eun (2005). Study for the conceptual variety of media education. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 28, 77-110.
  7. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2014). A study on the FRBR model of national bibliographic data based on RDA. Seoul: National Library of Korea.
  8. Min, H., Sin, M., Oh, H., Lee, J., An, J., Cho, J., & Park, J. (2019). Language and media. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  9. Park, Juhyeon (2018). A study on the development of conceptualization model for reading, information, ICT, and digital literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2), 267-300. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.2.201806.267
  10. Park, Juhyeon, Park, Sunghoon, & Kang, Bong-suk (2019). A study on the development of media type according to media concept and classification criteria. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(3), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.3.081
  11. Bang, M., An, H., Shin, S., Oh, H., Lee, Y., & Kim, T. (2019). Language and media. Seoul: Mirae-n.
  12. Shin, K., Kim, S., Yoo, S., Park, H., Kim, K., Ko, Y., … & Byeon, J. (2018). Media education support bill. Retrieved from http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/main.do
  13. Yoo, E., Ahn, M., Woo, S., Yoon, S., Lee, S., Jung C., … & Shim, K. (2018). A bill on activating media education. Retrieved from http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/main.do
  14. Lee, Mihwa (2013). A study on consideration in KCR4 through testing the description of content types and media types of ISBD and RDA. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.119
  15. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2019). A study on the direction of ‘library and information life’ curriculum revision based on ‘2015 revised national curriculum’. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(2), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.2.049
  16. Li, Xiaohui, & Lee Kyoungjin (2019). A study on activation of chinese media literacy educationthrough an integrated approach. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergentwith Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 9(2), 291-300.https://doi.org/10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.2.029
  17. Jeong, HyeonSeon, Kim, Amie, Park, Yooshin, Jeon, Gyeongran, Lee, Jisun, & Noh, Jayeon (2016). Media literacy as 21st century key competence: Systematizing media literacy teaching and learning contents. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(11), 211-238. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.11.211
  18. Korea Library Association. School Library Curriculum Committee (2007). Library and information life curriculum standards. Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  19. American Association of School Librarians & Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1998). Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago: ALA.
  20. American Association of School Librarians (2018). AASL standards framework for learners. Chicago: ALA.
  21. Anderson, Lorin W. et al. ed. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  22. Battelle for Kids (2019). Framework for 21st century learning definitions. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf
  23. Bloom, Benjamin S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
  24. Brayan, L. (2018). Media literacy & the AASL standards. Knowledge Quest, 47(1), 39-44.
  25. Collins (2020). Collins online english dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/
  26. Irving S. Gilmore Music Library in Yale University Library (2020). RDA. Retrieved from https://web.library.yale.edu/cataloging/music/rda
  27. Kymes, A. (2011). Media literacy and information literacy: A need for collaboration and communication. Action in Teacher Education, 33, 184-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.569445
  28. Li, Xiaohui, & Lee Kyoungjin (2019). A study on activation of chinese media literacy education through an integrated approach. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 9(2), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.2.029
  29. McLuhan, M. (1969). Understanding media. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  30. National Planning Advisory Committee (2017). List of top 100 national projects. Retrieved from http://www.korea.kr/common/download.do?tblKey=EDN&fileId=211947
  31. OECD (2010). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD.
  32. OECD (2018). Education 2030 curriculum content mapping: An analysis of the netherlands curriculum proposal. Paris: OECD.
  33. OECD (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030-oecd learning compass 2030. Paris: OECD.
  34. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
  35. UNESCO (2013). Global media and information literacy assessment framework: Country readiness and competencies. Paris: UNESCO.
  36. Wilson, C., Grizzle, A., Tuazon, R., Akyempong, K., & Cheung, C. K. (2011). Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers. Paris: UNESCO.
  37. 文部科学省 (1998). 学校図書館司書教諭講習規程の一部を改正する省令について (通知) Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/dokusho/link/1327076.htm