Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing Facets for Fiction Retrieval Based on User-generated Book Tags

이용자 생성 도서정보 태그에 기반한 소설 검색의 패싯 유형 개발

  • Received : 2020.05.26
  • Accepted : 2020.06.22
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify and systematize various facet elements required by users in fiction search situations from book tags to improve the fiction search environment. Based on the Ranganathan's PMEST formula, the basic facet system of the fiction was defined as 1) the personality that forms the fiction material, 2) the content and external characteristics that compose the fiction, 3) the reader interaction with books, 4) spatial information related to fiction and reading activities, and 5) time information related to fiction and reading activities. Out of approximately 310,000 tags assigned to 7,174 fiction, 3,730 core tags were selected and content-analyzed. As a result, various attributes were systematized around the top 25 categories of the fiction facets. The results of this study can be applied to facet navigation of OPAC and fiction DB in the future.

본 연구는 소설 검색 환경을 개선하기 위해, 도서태그로부터 소설 이용자가 소설 탐색 상황에서 요구하는 다양한 패싯 요소를 식별하고 체계화하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 소설의 기본 패싯 체계를 랑가나단의 PMEST 기본 패싯에 기반하여, 1) 소설 자료를 형성하는 주체, 2) 소설을 구성하는 내용적, 외형적 성질, 3) 독자가 책과 상호작용하는 행위, 4) 소설 및 독서활동과 관련된 공간 정보, 5) 소설 및 독서활동과 관련된 시간 정보로 정의하고, 소설 7,174건에 부여된 약 31만 건의 태그 중 핵심 태그 3,730건을 선별하여 내용분석하였다. 그 결과, 소설 패싯의 상위범주 25개를 중심으로 다양한 속성을 체계화하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 도서관 OPAC이나 소설 DB에 패싯 내비게이션 형태로 적용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Dong-Suk, & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2010). A study on the application of librarything folksonomy tags through the analysis of elements related with work. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 41-60. https://doi:10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.041
  2. Lee, Seungmin (2011). Construction of folksonomy tag framework using bibliographic record. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(2), 185-207. https://doi:10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.185
  3. Adkins, D., & Bossaller, J. E. (2007). Fiction access points across computer-mediated book information sources: A comparison of online bookstores, reader advisory databases, and public library catalogs. Library & Information Science Research, 29(3), 354-368. https://doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.03.004
  4. Atdag, S., & Labatut, V. (2013). A comparison of named entity recognition tools applied to biographical texts. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Systems and Computer Science, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/icconscs.2013.6632052
  5. Bartley, P. (2009). Book tagging on LibraryThing: How, why, and what are in the tags? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-22. https://doi:10.1002/meet.2009.1450460228
  6. Broughton, V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1-2), 49-72. https://doi:10.1108/00012530610648671
  7. Chung, Y. K. (2014). A study on varieties of subject access and usabilities of the national library of Korea subject headings. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4), 171-185. https://doi:10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.171
  8. Desrochers, N., Laplante, A., Martin, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Spiteri, L. (2016). Illusions of a "Bond": Tagging cultural products across online platforms. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), 1027-1051. https://doi:10.1108/jd-09-2015-0110
  9. Elson, D. K., & McKeown, K. R. (2010). Automatic attribution of quoted speech in literary narrative. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  10. Flick, U. (2019). An introduction to qualitative research (18th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
  11. Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208. https://doi:10.1177/0165551506062337
  12. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
  13. Iosif, E., & Mishra, T. (2014). From speaker identification to affective analysis: A multi-step system for analyzing children's stories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, Gothenburg, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-0906
  14. Lawson, K. G. (2009). Mining social tagging data for enhanced subject access for readers and researchers. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(6), 574-582. https://doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.020
  15. Lu, C. M., Park, J. R., & Hu, X. H. (2010). User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal of Information Science, 36(6), 763-779. https://doi:10.1177/0165551510386173
  16. Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J. R., Bethard, S., & McClosky, D. (2014, June). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. Paper presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, System Demonstrations, Stroudsburg, PA. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p14-5010
  17. Morbhead, D. R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Rouse, W. B. (1984). The value of information and computer-aided information seeking: Problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval. Information processing & management, 20(5-6), 583-601. https://doi:10.1016/0306-4573(84)90075-X
  18. Nadeau, D., & Sekine, S. (2007). A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30(1), 3-26. https://doi:10.1075/li.30.1.03nad
  19. Pejtersen, A. M. (1980). Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarian's search strategies. In O. Harboe & L. Kajberg (Eds.), Theory and Application of Information Research (pp. 146-159). London: Mansell.
  20. Pejtersen, A. M. (1997). Subject access to Scandinavian fiction literature: Index methods and OPAC development. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
  21. Pejtersen, A. M., & Austin, J. (1983). Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on users’ value criteria (part 1). Journal of Documentation, 39(4), 230-246. https://doi:10.1108/eb026750
  22. Pejtersen, A. M., & Austin, J. (1984). Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on users’ value criteria (part 2). Journal of Documentation, 40(1), 25-35. https://doi:10.1108/eb026755
  23. Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to library classification (3rd ed.). Bombay; New York: Asia Publishing House.
  24. Saarti, J. (1999). Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri. Journal of librarianship and information science, 31(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/096100069903100203
  25. Saarti, J. (2019). Fictional literature, classification and indexing. Knowledge Organization, 46(4), 320-332. https://doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2019-4-320
  26. Satija, M. (2017). Reviews of Concepts in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, 44(4), 291-307. https://doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2017-4-291
  27. Smith, T. (2007). Cataloging and you: Measuring the efficacy of a folksonomy for subject analysis. Paper presented at the 18th workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Milwaukee, WI.
  28. Solomon, P. (1997). Access to fiction for children: A user-based assessment of options and opportunities. Information Services & Use, 17(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-1997-172-308
  29. Wilson, H. W. (2016). Fiction Core Collection (18th ed.). Ipswich, Massachusetts: Grey House Publishing, Inc.
  30. Wu, D., He, D. Q., Qiu, J., Lin, R. N., & Liu, Y. (2013). Comparing social tags with subject headings on annotating books: A study comparing the information science domain in English and Chinese. Journal of Information Science, 39(2), 169-187. https://doi:10.1177/0165551512451808
  31. Yu, L., & O'Brien, A. (1997). Constructing references from the book to the reader in fiction searching, an experiment on the construction of information cues from the reading context approach. Information Services & Use, 17(2-3), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-1997-172-315