Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on Research Trends of Digital Humanities

디지털 인문학 분야의 국내외 연구 동향 분석

  • 정유경 (연세대학교 근대한국학연구소)
  • Received : 2020.05.26
  • Accepted : 2020.06.22
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is investigate the research trend on digital humanities. Previous studies focused on analyzing representative cases and national policies, not overall research trends in the digital humanities field. To this problem, this study intends to identify the intellectual structure of the digital humanities by adopting bibliometric approach. In this study, 1,765 articles retrieved from Web of Science and 514 records from RISS were analyzed to investigate research trends. Structural topic models were applied to examine research topics and to grasp the time-series trend. The results show that humanities-based convergence studies and digitization were main research interests in both side. In Korea, research topics related to cultural contents and storytelling were prominent, while in terms of providing digitized data, library and information science field was one of the important research topic abroad.

본 연구의 목적은 디지털 인문학 분야의 국내외 주요 연구의 동향을 살펴보고 비교 분석하는 데 있다. 기존의 디지털 인문학 동향에 관한 연구들은 해외의 주요 연구사례와 국가정책, 발전 방향 등을 검토하는 연구들로, 디지틸 인문학 분야의 세부 연구주제 및 하위 분야를 파악하는 것과는 거리가 있었다. 본 연구에서는 국내외 학술 문헌의 계량서지적 분석을 통해 디지털 인문학 분야의 지적 구조를 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 위해 Web of Science와 RISS로부터 2020년 3월까지 출판된 디지털 인문학 관련 국내외 학술 문헌을 수집하여 분석에 사용하였다. 이 자료들을 대상으로 구조적 토픽모델을 적용하여 세부 주제들을 살펴보았으며, 이 주제들의 시계열적 추이를 파악하였다. 분석결과, 국내외 공통적으로 인문학 기반의 융합 연구들이 수행되었으며, 주로 사료의 디지털화가 주된 연구의 관심사였다. 국내는 문화콘텐츠와 스토리텔링 관련된 연구주제가 두드러지게 나타났으며, 해외는 디지털화된 자료의 제공 측면에서 문헌정보학 관련 주제들이 주목을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 국내의 디지털 인문학 분야의 연구 공백을 파악하고 연구주제 확장이 가능한 영역들을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon, Ki-Sung, & Kim, Dong-Keon (2019). The classification of Sim Cheong-jeon through a computer analysis technique of bibliographies. Journal of Pansori, 47, 167-205. https://doi.org/10.18102/jp.2019.04.47.167
  2. Kim, Ba-Ro (2014). Trend of digital humanities. Korea Humanities Content Society, 33, 229-254.
  3. Kim, Ba-Ro (2019). Reading buddhist scriptures with deep learning - Reading CBETA buddhist scriptures data with Word2Vec. Won-Buddhist Thought & Religious Culture, 80, 249-279.
  4. Kim, Jae Yon (2017, September, 5). Digital humanities, Will it lead to changes in humanities. The Weekly Kyunghyang, 1242. http://weekly.khan.co.kr/khnm.html?mode=view&artid=201708281902091&code=116
  5. Kim, Jong-dae (2014). Digital humanities in deutschland. Philosophy & Culture, 32, 55-76.
  6. Kim, Hyeon (2013). Digital humanities: Cooperative scheme between humanities and cultural contents. Korea Humanities Content Society, 29, 9-26.
  7. Kim, Hyeon, Yim, Young-Sang, & Kim, Ba-ro (2016). Digital humanities. Seoul: HUEBOOKs,
  8. Park, Jong Do (2019). A study on issue tracking on multi-cultural studies using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(3), 273-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275.KSLIS.2019.53.3.273 https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.273
  9. Son, Jeong Houn, & Kim, Min Kyu (2018). La tendence et la politique des humanites numeriques en france. Etudes de la Culture Francaise et des Arts en France, 64, 125-151. https://doi.org/10.21651/cfaf.2018.64..125
  10. Aiden, Erez, & Michel, Jean-Baptiste (2015). Uncharted: Big data as a lens on human culture. Riverhead Books, 2013.
  11. 이광석, 윤자형 (2019). 국내 디지털인문학의 정착과 굴곡: 대학 교육과 미디어 테크놀로지의 불안정한 접속. 한국언론정보학보, 95, 9-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.46407/kjci.2019.06.95.9
  12. Lee, Jae-Yon (2016). Keywords AND networks - exploring the thematic maps of kaebyok through topic modelling. Sanghur Hakbo, 46, 277-334. https://doi.org/10.22936/SH.46..201602.007
  13. Lee, Jae-Yon (2018). From humanities in the digital age to the age of digital humanities: History of adopting DH in Korean literary studies. The Korean Historical Review, 240, 157-190. https://doi.org/10.16912/tkhr.2018.12.240.157
  14. Lee, Ji-soo (2017). Definition and research status of digital humanities: Focusing on digitization of knowledge information in Japanese studies. Korean Japanese of Japanese Language and Literature, 74, 41-62. https://doi.org/10.18704/kjjll.2017.09.74.41
  15. Lee, Jin-O, & Kim, Dong-Keon (2019). A study on the classification of jeokbyeok-ga's version by the computer analysis technique of bibliographies. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(6), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.06.001
  16. Jo, Man-Hyeong (2007). The need of national 'e-Science' strategy. The Science & Technology, (12), 12-13.
  17. Choe, Jae-Woong, & Lee, Do-Gil (2014). Trends 21 corpus: Public web resources and search tools. Korean Cultural Studies, (64), 3-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17948/kcs.2014..64.
  18. Hur Soo (2014). The meaning of 'jegook(帝國)' in corpus networks - centering on the analysis of 'imperialism' and 'empire'. Journal of Eastern studies, 87, 501-562. https://doi.org/10.18219/ddmh..87.201409.501
  19. Ayadi, R., Maraoui, M., & Zrigui, M. (2015, October). LDA and LSI as a dimensionality reduction method in arabic document classification. In International conference on information and software technologies (pp. 491-502). Springer, Cham.
  20. Gold, M. K., & Klein, L. F. (Eds.). (2016). Debates in the digital humanities 2016. U of Minnesota Press.
  21. Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228-5235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101
  22. Lee, J., & Lee, H. E. (2019). Digital humanities and new directions in South Korea. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(4), 772-790. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy081
  23. Moretti, F. (2005). Graphs, maps, trees: abstract models for a literary history. Verso.
  24. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2014). stm: R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 10(2), 1-40.
  25. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K.Albertson, B., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open‐ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064-1082. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
  26. Rumsey, A. (2011). Scholarly Communication Institute 9 - New-Model Scholarly Communication: Road Map for Change. University of Virginia Library http://uvasci.org/institutes-2003-2011/SCI-9-Road-Map-for-Change.pdf
  27. Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2008). A companion to digital humanities. John Wiley & Sons.