DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study on job orientation between enterprises and job seekers: Focusing on the recruitment process

구인기업과 구직자 간의 채용경향성 비교 연구: 채용프로세스를 중심으로

  • Hu, Sung-Ho (Department of Psychology, ChungAng University)
  • Received : 2020.05.11
  • Accepted : 2020.07.20
  • Published : 2020.07.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the differences in employment trends between enterprises and job seekers related to the 4th Industrial Revolution, focusing on the 11 elements of recruitment process. As a method of analysis, a methodology suitable for the convergence research methodology was used by mixing social network analysis and variance analysis, and significant results were derived. First, while large enterprises emphasized organizational culture and job analysis, small enterprises emphasized an interview from the perspective of practitioners. Second, in both manufacturing and service industries, enterprises emphasized interviews and documents, but job seekers emphasized job analysis. Third, the proportion of the recruitment process was found to be greater in the manufacturing industry than in the service industry. Fourth, it was found that enterprises accounted for a larger proportion of the recruitment process than job seekers. This showed an interaction effect between the subject and the industry sector. Therefore, the evaluation of the recruitment process between enterprises and job seekers was found to be very different.

본 연구의 목적은 4차 산업혁명과 관련되는 기업과 구직자 간의 채용경향의 차이를 11개로 구성된 채용프로세스 요소를 중심으로 비교분석하는 것이다. 분석방법은 사회연결망 분석과 변량분석을 혼합하여 융합연구 방법론에 적합한 연구방법을 활용하였고, 유의한 결과를 도출하였다. 첫째, 대기업은 조직문화와 직무분석을 강조하였고, 중소기업은 실무자 관점의 면접을 강조하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 제조업과 서비스업 모두에서 구인기업은 면접과 서류를 강조하였지만, 구직자는 직무분석을 강조하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 채용프로세스의 비중은 제조업이 서비스업보다 더 큰 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 구인기업이 구직자에 비해 더 큰 채용프로세스 비중을 차지하는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 산업유형과 상호작용 효과를 보이고 있었다. 따라서 기업과 구직자 간에 나타나는 채용프로세스 평가에서 많은 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. H. Kim. (2019). Young people not in education, employment or training in the UK and South Korea: Comparative evidence from the PIAAC. Studies on Korean Youth, 30(1), 185-217. https://doi.org/10.14816/sky.2019.30.1.185
  2. Statics Korea. (2020). Social investigation research. Statics Korea.
  3. M. A. Peters & P. Jandric. (2019). Education and technological unemployment in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In The Oxford Handbook of Higher Education Systems and University Management. Oxford University Press.
  4. M. A. Peters, P. Jandrić, & A. J. Means. (Eds.). (2019). Education and technological unemployment. Springer.
  5. S. H. Hu & H. Y. Chang. (2019). Employment Trends in the Fourth industrial Revolution Era :Analysis of Hiring Trends of Autonomous Automobile Industry Related Companies. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.1.001
  6. G. Hwang. (2019). Challenges for Innovative HRD in era of the 4th Industrial Revolution. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 8(2), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2019.8.2.288
  7. W. Teng, C. Ma, S. Pahlevansharif, & J. J. Turner. (2019). Graduate readiness for the employment market of the 4th industrial revolution. Education and Training.
  8. T. Kim, W. S. Sul, Y. Lee, & H. J. Ko. (2019). Research for activation of new industry-university cooperation. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(12), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.12.077
  9. S. Falcone. (2019). International student recruitment: Trends and challenges. Journal of International Students, 7(2), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v7i2.379
  10. S. Lee & H. Lee. (2018). A Study on the Improving Direction of Government Policy for Micro-enterprise: Focused on Fund, Education and Consulting Service. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(9), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.9.039
  11. H. C. Park. (2017). A Study on the Relative Mutual Information Measures in a Viewpoint of Association Rule. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 19(3), 1327-1336. https://doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2017.19.3.1327
  12. J. Scott. (2017). Social network analysis. Sage.
  13. M. Hermann, T. Pentek & B. Otto. (2016). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 3928-3937). IEEE.
  14. S. P. Borgatti & M. G. Everett. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social networks, 19(3), 243-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2
  15. A. Gandomi & M. Haider. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
  16. M. Kantardzic. (2011). Data mining: concepts, models, methods, and algorithms. John Wiley & Sons.
  17. D. Jiang, Y. Wang, Z. Lv, S. Qi, & S. Singh. (2019). Big data analysis-based network behavior insight of cellular networks for industry 4.0 applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.
  18. R. J. Roiger. (2017). Data mining: a tutorial-based primer. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  19. E. von Kardorff. (2019). Barnes (1954): Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. In Schlusselwerke der Netzwerkforschung (pp. 31-34). Springer VS, Wiesbaden.
  20. M. S. Shaharudin, Y Fernando, C. J. C. Jabbour, R. Sroufe, & M. F. A. Jasmi. (2019). Past, present, and future low carbon supply chain management: A content review using social network analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 218, 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.016
  21. D. K. Diehl. (2019). Language and interaction: applying sociolinguistics to social network analysis. Quality & Quantity, 53(2), 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0787-5
  22. A. Hasegawa. (2019). The Social Lives of Study Abroad: Understanding Second Language Learners' Experiences Through Social Network Analysis and Conversation Analysis. Routledge.
  23. R. W. Lee, S. Hu, J. Y. Park & H. S. Lee. (2017). Analysis of the Effect of Lifelong Learning Motivation on Lifelong Learning Competency: Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Empowerment. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 19(2), 931-943. https://doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2017.19.2.931
  24. K. L. Choi & B. Kim. (2013). A Study on the Relationship between Job Transition and Personal Attributes using Multiple Logit Model. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 15(2), 799-812.
  25. S. Hu, T. Y. Jung & Y. R. Cha. (2009). An Analysis on The Effects of Corporate Image, Harmful Items Relevance And Sponsorship Purpose on Sponsorship Effectiveness. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11(4), 2147-2164.