Journal of Aerospace System Engineering (항공우주시스템공학회지)

The Society for Aerospace System Engineering (항공우주시스템공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement of Regulations for AMO Global Recognition System of International Civil Aviation Organization

정비조직인증 국제인정체계 대응을 위한 규정 개선 연구

  • Choe, Yunseon (Incheon Industry-Academy Collaboration Institute) ;
  • Lee, Sunkyung (Incheon Industry-Academy Collaboration Institute) ;
  • Lee, Chaeyoung (Incheon Industry-Academy Collaboration Institute)
  • Received : 2020.04.20
  • Accepted : 2020.06.04
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in 2015 proposed a road-map for the global recognition system of the Approved Maintenance Organization (AMO) fto mitigate the redundant work and regulatory burdens of the aviation industry and authorities on the certification and oversight activities of the State of Registry. Since then, the ICAO standards and guidelines have been revised accordingly with the goal of implementing the system in 2024. Korea should actively prepare for this AMO global recognition system to cope with the ICAO road-map appropriately as well as to develop the Maintenance Repair Overhaul (MRO) industry. Thus, this paper focused on the ratings and limitations system, a key element of the AMO, and proposes the improvement of domestic regulatory/administrative rules necessary for the global recognition system, through the review of newly established ICAO standards/guidelines and the comparative analysis of leading aviation countries' and Korean system/requirements.

국제민간항공기구(ICAO)는 항공기 등록국가별 정비조직인증 및 감독활동에 대한 산업계 및 항공당국의 중복 업무 및 규제부담을 경감할 목적으로 정비조직인증 국제인정(AMO Global Recognition)체계에 대한 로드맵을 2015년에 제시하였다. 이후 ICAO는 2024년 이 체계 시행을 목표로 ICAO 표준 및 지침서등을 순차적으로 개정하고 있다. 우리나라는 ICAO의 로드맵 대응 목적뿐만 아니라 국내 항공정비산업(MRO)의 발전을 위해서도 정비조직인증 국제인정체계를 적극적으로 준비하여야 한다. 이에 본 논문에서는 정비조직인증의 핵심 분야인 업무한정체계에 대한 ICAO 표준 검토 및 항공선진국 제도와 국내 제도를 비교분석하여 차이점 및 보완사항을 식별하고 관련 법규의 개선 방향을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. ICAO Working Paper/73, High Level Safety Conference, 2010.
  2. ICAO Annex 1, Personnel Licensing(12th Ed., July 2018), Annex 6 Operation of Aircraft(11th Ed., July 2018), Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft(12th Ed., July 2018) and ICAO Doc.9760, Airworthiness Manual(draft 2019)
  3. FAA, Title 14 CFR Part 145, Repair stations, https://www.ecfr.gov, (accessed on April 20, 2020)
  4. FAA, Oder 8900.1, Flight Standards Information Management System(FSIMS), https://fsims.faa.gov, (accessed on April 20, 2020)
  5. EASA Regulation(EU) No. 1321/2014, Continuing Airwothiness, Annex I (Part-M), Appendix IV and Annex 2 (Part-145), 145.A.10 Scope, April 2019.
  6. CAAS, Singapore Airworthiness Requirements Part 145, Approved Maintenance Organisations, amendment 16, November 1, 2018.
  7. Y. S. Choe, H. G. Chung, S. J. Choi and H. W. Hwang, "A Study on Regulatory System for the Approval of Aircraft Repairs and Modifications," Journal of the Aviation Management Society of Korea, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29-45, February. 2020. https://doi.org/10.30529/amsok.2020.18.1.002
  8. FAA Order 8000.85C, FAA Program for the Establishment of a MIP Under the Provision for a BASA, June 7, 2017.
  9. FAA, Title 14 CFR Part 43, Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding and Alteration, https://www.ecfr.gov, (accessed on April 20, 2020)
  10. Maintenance Annex Guidance between FAA and EASA, November 18, 2019.
  11. Maintenance Agreement Guidance between FAA and CAAS, July 12, 2017.
  12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Public Notice no. 2012-868, December 4, 2012.
  13. EASA Regulation(EU) No. 1321/2014, Continuing Airwothiness, Annex I (Part-M), Subpart B, Accountability, M.A.201(e), April 2019.
  14. FAA, Title 14 CFR Part 121, Operating Requirements: Domestic, Flags, and Supplemental Operations, $\S$ 121.367, https://www.ecfr.gov, (accessed on April 20, 2020)
  15. H. M. Joe, "Comparison of AMO System between Korea and US," Journal of Aerospace System Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 27-33, 2016. https://doi.org/10.20910/JASE.2016.10.2.27
  16. J. B. Kim, J. Lee and H. Y. Hurr, "A Comparative study Between the Approved Maintenance Organizations for MROs of FAA and EASA," Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Flight Operation, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 123-134, September 2017.