DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation on Fatigue Behavior of Resilience pad for Sleeper Floating Track System in Urban Transit

도시철도 침목플로팅궤도(STEDEF)의 침목방진패드 피로거동 분석

  • 최정열 (동양대학교 철도건설안전공학과) ;
  • 이정숙 (서울교통공사 토목처) ;
  • 봉재근 (서울교통공사 궤도2사업소) ;
  • 김수진 (동양대학교 철도건설안전공학과) ;
  • 정지승 (동양대학교 철도건설안전공학과)
  • Received : 2020.03.04
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

In this study, the variation of track impact factor according to the spring stiffness change rate of sleeper resilience pad was analyzed based on field measurements. In addition, the correlation between field measurement results and 7 million fatigue test results was verified. The fatigue effect diagram of the sleeper resilience pads was presented considering the nonlinear deterioration characteristics of the sleeper resilience pads used for the STEDEF track. Based on the field measurement results, the nonlinear characteristics of the track impact factor for the spring stiffness change rate over 30% of sleeper resilience pad on the track impact factor-track support stiffness diagram were analyzed to be consistent with the fatigue test results.

본 연구는 현장측정결과를 바탕으로 도시철도 침목플로팅궤도 (STEDEF)에 사용되는 침목방진패드의 스프링 강성 변화율에 따른 궤도충격계수 변화수준의 경향성을 분석하고, 현장측정결과와 실내 700만회 피로시험결과의 상관관계를 입증하였다. 또한 도시철도 STEDEF 궤도구조에 사용되는 침목방진패드의 비선형 피로거동특성이 고려된 침목방진패드의 피로영향선도를 제시하였다. 현장측정결과를 바탕으로 분석한 궤도충격계수-궤도지지강성 선도의 침목방진패드 스프링강성 변화율 30% 이상에 대한 궤도충격계수의 비선형 특성이 피로시험결과와 일치하는 것으로 분석되었다. 대부분의 침목방진패드 시료에서 침목방진패드 규격서에서 명시한 정, 동적 스프링강성 기준치를 상회하는 수준으로 나타났으며, 작은 하중범위에서의 변위가 큰 침목방진패드의 소재적인 특성을 감안할 때 열차하중을 부담하는 침목방진패드의 전체적인 탄성변위량이 클수록 연행집중하중으로 작용하는 열차 하중에 의한 탄성변위의 회복속도가 늦어지고 탄성변위향은 작아지게 되므로 정적 대비 동적 스프링 강성의 비가 커지게 된는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. J.Y. Choi, H.S. Gong, J.H Kim, H.S Kim and J.S Chung. "An Experimental Study on Causes Evaluation of Rail Corrugation for Concrete track(STEDEF) in Urban Transit," The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 413-418, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2018.4.4.413
  2. D.W. Lee, "Fatigue Effect Evaluation Method of Resilience Pad for Sleeper Floating Track" Ph.D. thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 2015.
  3. E.S. Lim, "A Study of correlation between spring constant of anti-vibration sleeper pad and thickness variation on floating track," Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 2017.
  4. S.Y. Lee, I.C. Jeong, J.Y. Choi and Y.G. Park. "Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Behavior for Floating Track System Using a Resilient Rubber Mat", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 281-288, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2014.17.4.281
  5. D.W. Joe "The Estimation of Fatigue Life for CWR on Concrete Track with Resilience pad in Urban Railway", Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 2016.
  6. Kim, mh., "A study on the dynamic behavior of sleeper floating track according to various track support stiffness on serviced urban transit," Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 2015.
  7. H.S. Y and Y.T. Kim, "Parametric study on Structural Integrity Evaluation for Concrete Track of Urban Transit," Journal of the Korean Society for City Railway, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 905-917, 2017. https://doi.org/10.24284/JKOSUR.2017.09.5.3.905
  8. S.Y. Lee, I.C. Jeong, J.Y. Choi and Y.G. Park. "Experimental Study on the Evaluation of Behavior for Floating Track System Using a Resilient Rubber Mat", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 281-288, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2014.17.4.281
  9. J.Y. Choi, Y.G. Park and S.M. Lee, “The Evaluation of Track Impact Factor on the Various Track Type in Urban Transit,” Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 248-255, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2011.14.3.248
  10. G.T. Noh, H.J. Lim, J.Y. Lee and Y.G. Park. "Evaluation of Track Support Stiffness and Track Impact factor for Ballast and Concrete Type Tracks", Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 389-395, 2018. https://doi.org/10.7782/jksr.2018.21.4.389