Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Current Status and Improvement Plans of the User Service in Open Data Portal - Focusing on Citizen Participation Data Portal -

공공데이터포털 이용자 서비스 현황 분석 및 개선방안 - 시민참여형 데이터포털을 중심으로 -

  • 한희정 (전북대학교 문화융복합아카이빙연구소) ;
  • 황성욱 (전북대학교 일반대학원 기록관리학과) ;
  • 이정민 (전북대학교 일반대학원 기록관리학과) ;
  • 오효정 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2020.02.20
  • Accepted : 2020.03.16
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, as the range of users utilizing open data has expanded from experts to students, and general citizens, the role of open data portals has changed. In the past, portals have neglected to increase data utilization through citizen participation by focusing on the role of simple data repository, but now they tend to focus on understanding, collaboration and sharing values so that users can actively use data. To meet these social trends, open data portals need to seek ways to improve user-centered services that can encourage citizen participation. The purpose of this study is to identify the main functions for citizen participation in open data portals, to analyze the current status of open data portal user services and to suggest ways to improve them. Through the literature research, we investigated the functions provided by portal services for citizen participation, deduced the types of user services, and analyzed open data portal user services. Furthermore, we suggested user-centered public data portal services improvement plans for citizen participation.

최근 공공데이터를 활용하는 이용자의 범위가 전문가부터 학생, 정부 관계자, 일반 시민까지 확대됨에 따라, 공공데이터포털의 역할도 변화하고 있다. 과거의 포털은 단순한 데이터 저장소(Data Repository)로서의 역할에 치우쳐 시민의 참여를 통한 데이터 활용을 높이는 데에는 다소 소홀하였다면, 현재는 이용자가 적극적으로 데이터를 활용할 수 있도록 이해·협업·공유 가치에 방점을 두는 추세이다. 이러한 사회적 흐름에 부응하기 위해 공공데이터 포털은 시민의 참여를 장려할 수 있는 이용자 중심의 서비스 개선 방안을 모색할 필요가 있다. 이에 본 연구는 공공데이터포털에 시민참여를 위한 주요 기능을 규명하고 현재 운영 중인 공공데이터포털 이용자 서비스의 현황을 분석하여 그에 따른 개선방안 제시를 최종 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 먼저, 문헌 조사를 통해 시민참여를 위해 포털 서비스에서 제공되고 있는 기능들을 조사하고 분류하여 이용자 서비스 유형을 도출한 후, 이를 기준으로 국내외 공공데이터포털 이용자 서비스 현황을 분석하였다. 이를 통해 공공데이터포털이 제공하는 이용자 서비스의 문제점과 방향성에 대한 시사점을 도출한 후 시민참여를 위한 이용자 중심의 공공데이터 포털 서비스 개선방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Act on Promotion of the Provision and Use of Public data. 2017, No. 14839
  2. Kim, Beom-soo and Woo-young Chang. 2018. "The Exploratory Study on the 14 Cases of Online Based Citizen Participation Politics." East and West Studies, 30(1): 5-30. https://doi.org/10.29274/ews.2018.30.1.5
  3. NEWSJELLY. 2018. "The direction of data open with 10 best practices for using public data." newsjelly report.
  4. U.S. Government's Open Data Portal Home Page. [cited 2020. 02. 19].
  5. Bae, Kwi-Hee and Seung-Hoo Lim. 2009. "A Study on the Effect of Trust in Government on Formal Citizen Participation."Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 21(4): 1421-1449.
  6. Seoul Open Data Portal Home Page. [cited 2020. 02. 19].
  7. Seo, Hyung-jun, Seung-hwan Myeong. 2014. "Policy Alternatives for User-oriented Public Data Utilization - Focusing on ICT Managers' Perception in Private Sector." The Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 17(3): 61-86.
  8. Song, Hyo-jin and Sung-Soo Hwang. 2014. "Seeking Strategies for Local Governments to Prepare for Public Data Act." The Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 17(2): 1-28.
  9. 신승윤, 안선민, 김동욱. 2017. 연령별 온라인시민참여에 관한 연구 - 인터넷이용능력의 영향을 중심으로. 한국정책학회보, 26(1), 287-318.
  10. Ministry of Public Administration and Security(2014). "Goverment 3.0 Guideline."
  11. UK Government's Open Data Portal Home Page. [cited 2019. 02. 19].
  12. Yun, Sang-Oh and Ji-Woo Hyeon. 2019. "An Analysis of Open Data Policy in Korea: Focused on National Core Data in Open Data Portal." Korea Assocation for Public Management, 33(1): 219-247.
  13. Yi, Hyun-Jung and Young-Joon Nam. 2014. "A study on the analysis about practicality after publishing Linked Open Data - focused on National bibliography and RISS." Korean Society for Information Society, 8: 109-114.
  14. Lim, Junwon and Gyunghyun Choi. 2017. "Public Value Generating Mechanisms using Open Data Pokicies." Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 16(1): 37-49.
  15. KR Government's Open Data Portal Home Page. [cited 2020. 02. 19].
  16. Han, Eok-Soo. 2018. "A Study on Public Data Opening Status and Utilization Policy." The Korea Contents Association, 77-78.
  17. Ministry of Public Administration and Security. "Open Data." [cited 2020. 02. 19].
  18. Carrara, W. et al. 2015. "Creating value through open data: Study on the impact of re-use of public data resources." European Commission. European Data Portal.
  19. Creighton, J. L. 2005. "The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement," San Francisco: John Wiley & Soms.
  20. Danneels. et al. 2017. "Open data platforms: discussing alternative knowledge epistemologies." Government Information Quarterly, 34(3): 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.007
  21. Evans-Cowley, Jennifer. and Justin Hollander. 2010. "The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-based Participation Tools." Planning Practice & Research, 25(3): 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2010.503432
  22. Granickas, Karolis. 2013. "Understanding the impact of releasing and re-using Open Data." European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report No. 2013/08.
  23. Gurstein, M. 2013. "Should "Open Government Data" be a product or a service (and why does it matter)." Gurstein's Community Informatics, 3.
  24. Janssen, Marijn. et al. 2012. "Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government." IS Management, 29(4): 258-268.
  25. Kassen, Maxat. 2013. "A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project." Government Information Quarterly, 30(4): 508-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.012
  26. Lourenco, R.P. 2015. "An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability." Government Information Quarterly, 32: 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
  27. Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo. et al. 2012. "Open government 2.0: citizen empowerment through open data, web and mobile apps." Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 30-33.
  28. Scaff, Lawrence. A. 1975. "Two Concepts of Political Participation." Western Political Quarterly, 28(3): 447-462. https://doi.org/10.2307/447366
  29. Sieber, Renee. and Peter Johnson. 2015. "Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges." Government Information Quarterly, 32.
  30. Sullivan, Brian L. et al. 2014. "The eBird enterprise : An integrated approach to development and application." Biological Conservation, 169: 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003
  31. Themistocleous, Marinos. et al. 2012. "Location-based services for public policy making: The direct and indirect way to e-participation." Information Systems Management, 29(4): 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716743
  32. Tulloch. et al. 2013. "Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs." Biological Conservation, 165: 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025