Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment (생태와환경)

The Korean Society of Limnology (한국수생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes of Ground-dwelling Arthropod Communities for 10 Years after Thinning in a Pinus koraiensis Plantation

잣나무림에서 간벌 이후 지표 절지동물 군집의 변화 특성 분석

  • Received : 2020.05.29
  • Accepted : 2020.06.11
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Forest thinning brought the large variation to forest ecosystem including environment and animal. Our study was result of long-term monitoring for ground-dwelling arthropod communities after thinning in forest ecosystem. In this study, we conducted field study on plantation forest in Chuncheon, Korea in 2018, and compared with previous study data (2006 and 2008). We found that the effect of thinning was still existent 10 years later from thinning with difference of habitat environment(depth of ground organic matter, coverage rate of ground vegetation and canopy). And ground-dwelling arthropod communities showed changes of abundance and taxa at the study area and thinning conditions. Ground-dwelling arthropod communities in 2018 were dominant in the order of Diptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera (Insecta), Araneae (Arachnida) and Collembola (Collembola). Among the conditions of thinning, Araneae (Arachnida), Coleoptera and Hymenoptera (Insecta) showed amount of abundance in heavy thinning. And Collembola (Collembola) and Diptera (Insecta) were most common in area of light thinning. In 2018 ground-dwelling arthropod communities, abundance of Diptera and Coleoptera (Insecta) and Isopoda (Crustacea) were decreased although Hemiptera and Orthoptera (Insecta) were increased than 2008 arthropod communities. Arthropod communities in 2018 were more similar with those in 2008 (after thinning) than with those in 2006 (before thinning).

본 연구에서는 간벌 이후 지표 절지동물 군집의 장기적인 변화를 확인하기 위해, 잣나무조림지에서 간벌 전후에 조사되었던 과거 지표 절지동물 군집 자료와 간벌처리 10년 후인 2018년에 채집한 군집 자료를 비교하였다. 조사지역에서는 간벌 이후 10년이 지났으나 여전히 간벌처리에 따른 서식 환경(유기물 깊이, 지표면 식생 피도, 울폐도)의 차이가 나타났다. 2018년 조사된 절지동물 군집은 곤충강파리목, 벌목, 딱정벌레목, 톡토기강 톡토기목, 거미강 거미목 순으로 우점하였고, 간벌처리 조건 중 강도간벌에서는 거미강 거미목, 곤충강 딱정벌레목과 벌목이, 약도간벌에서 톡토기강 톡토기목과 곤충강 파리목이 가장 많이 나타났다. 간벌 직후인 2008년에 비해 2018년 곤충강 딱정벌레목과 파리목, 벌목, 갑각강 등각목의 개체수는 감소하였고, 곤충강 노린재목과 메뚜기목의 개체수는 증가하였다. 2018년의 지표 절지동물 군집은 간벌 이전인 2006년 군집에 비해, 간벌 직후인 2008년 군집과 유사한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 지표 절지동물 군집의 변화를 조사지역 및 간벌처리 조건에 따라 나타내어, 차후 산림 내 간벌 계획 작성 또는 간벌을 이용한 산림 자원 관리에 대한 기초 자료를 제공한다. 이후로 다양한 간벌처리지 내 조사 등이 수반된 추가 연구가 수행된다면, 간벌로 인한 산림 절지동물 군집 변화를 더욱 명확하게 규명할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baldi, A. 2003. Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic and Applied Ecology 4: 589-593. https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00193
  2. Basset, Y., L. Cizek, P. Cuenoud, R.K. Didham, F. Guilhaumon, O. Missa, V. Novotny, F. Odegaard, T. Roslin, J. Schmidl, A.K. Tishechkin, N.N. Winchester, D.W. Roubik, H.-P. Aberlenc, J. Bail, H. Barrios, J.R. Bridle, G. Castano-Meneses, B. Corbara, G. Curletti, W. Duarte da Rocha, D. De Bakker, J.H.C. Delabie, A. Dejean, L.L. Fagan, A. Floren, R.L. Kitching, E. Medianero, S.E. Miller, E. Gama de Oliveira, J. Orivel, M. Pollet, M. Rapp, S.P. Ribeiro, Y. Roisin, J.B. Schmidt, L. Sorensen and M. Leponce. 2012. Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science 338: 1481-1484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226727
  3. Bruhl, C.A., G. Gunsalam and K.E. Linsenmair. 1998. Stratification of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a primary rain forest in Sabah, Borneo. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467498000224
  4. Cardoso, P., I. Silva, N.G. de Oliveira and A.R.M. Serrano. 2004. Higher taxa surrogates of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biological Conservation 117: 453-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.013
  5. Choi, J.W., E.H. Lee, J.K. Eo, C.D. Koo and A.H. Eom. 2014. Community changes of ectomycorrhizal fungi by thinning in a forest of Korea. The Korean Journal of Mycology 42: 133-137. https://doi.org/10.4489/KJM.2014.42.2.133
  6. Converse, S.J., W.M. Block and G.C. White. 2006. Small mammal population and habitat responses to forest thinning and prescribed fire. Forest Ecology and Management 228: 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.006
  7. Dinno, A. 2017. dunn.test: Dunn's Test of Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. R package version 1.3.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test.
  8. Filser, J. 2002. The role of Collembola in carbon and nitrogen cycling in soil: Proceedings of the Xth international Colloquium on Apterygota, Ceske Budejovice 2000: Apterygota at the Beginning of the Third Millennium. Pedobiologia 46: 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00130
  9. Frouz, J. 1999. Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptera) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74(1-3): 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00036-5
  10. Grace, J.M., R.W. Skaggs and G.M. Chescheir. 2006. Hydrologic and water quality effects of thinning loblolly pine. Transactions of the ASABE 49: 645-654. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20484
  11. Grialou, J.A., S.D. West and R.N. Wilkins. 2000. The effects of forest clearcut harvesting and thinning on terrestrial salamanders. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 105-113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802979
  12. Hagar, J. and C. Friesen. 2009. Young Stand Thinning and Diversity Study: Response of Songbird Community One Decade Post-Treatment. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20 pp.
  13. Hayes, J.P., J.M. Weikel and M.M.P. Huso. 2003. Response of birds to thinning young Douglas-fir forests. Ecological Applications 13: 1222-1232. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-5068
  14. Holldobler, B. and E.O. Wilson. 1990. The Ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
  15. Kang, H.M., J.T. Song, S.H. Choi and D.H. Kim. 2017. The change of soil animals by forest ecosystem restoration types. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 31: 62-71. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2017.31.1.062
  16. Kang, J.S., M. Shibuya and C.S. Shin. 2014. The effect of forest- thinning works on tree growth and forest environment. Forest Science and Technology 10: 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2013.821958
  17. Kitching, R.L., A.G. Orr, L. Thalib, H. Mitchell, M.S. Hopkins and A.W. Graham. 2000. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 284-297. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00490.x
  18. Kwon, T.-S., Y.S. Kim, S.W. Lee and Y.-S. Park. 2016a. Changes of soil arthropod communities in temperate forests over 10years (1998-2007). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 19: 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2016.01.003
  19. Kwon, T.S., C.M. Lee, S.-S. Kim and Y.K. Park. 2016b. Change of Beetle Communities in Burned Forest. National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul.
  20. Kwon, T.S., Y.K. Park, J.H. Lim, S.H. Ryou and C.M. Lee. 2013. Change of arthropod abundance in burned forests: different patterns according to functional guilds. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 16: 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2013.04.008
  21. Kwon, T.S., H.M. Yang, J.H. Shin, S.-K. Kim and H. Yi. 2010. Effects of thinning on abundance and community structure of arthropods in a Pinus koraiensis plantation. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 49: 187-198. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.3.187
  22. Lenski, R.E. 1982. The impact of forest cutting on the diversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the southern Appalachians. Ecological Entomology 7: 385-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1982.tb00680.x
  23. Maleque, M.A., K. Maeto and H.T. Ishii. 2009. Arthropods as bioindicators of sustainable forest management, with a focus on plantation forests. Applied Entomology and Zoology 44: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2009.1
  24. May, R.M. 1988. How many species are there on Earth? Science 241: 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.241.4872.1441
  25. Menta, C. and S. Remelli. 2020. Soil health and arthropods: From complex system to worthwhile investigation. Insects 11(1): 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11010054
  26. Michaels, K.F. and P.B. McQuillan. 1995. Impact of commercial forest management on geophilous carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in tall, wet Eucalyptus obliqua forest in southern Tasmania. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00543.x
  27. Miranda, P.N., F.B. Baccaro, E.F. Morato, M.A. Oliveira and J.H.C. Delabie. 2017. Limited effects of low-intensity forest management on ant assemblages in southwestern Amazonian forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 26: 2435-2451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1368-y
  28. Moon, M., S.-S. Kim, D.-S. Lee, H. Yang, C.-W. Park, H. Kim and Y.-S. Park. 2018. Effects of forest management practices on moth communities in a Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carriere) plantation. Forests 9: 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090574
  29. Niemela, J., J.R. Spence and D.H. Spence. 1992. Habitat associations and seasonal activity of ground-beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in central Alberta. The Canadian Entomologist 124: 521-540. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent124521-3
  30. Oksanen, J., F.G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P.R. Minchin, R.B. O'Hara, G.L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M.H.H. Stevens, E. Szoecs and H. Wagner. 2019. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6. https://CRAN. R-project.org/package=vegan.
  31. Olajuyigbe, S., B. Tobin, M. Saunders and M. Nieuwenhuis. 2012. Forest thinning and soil respiration in a Sitka spruce forest in Ireland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 157: 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.01.016
  32. Oxbrough, A.G., T. Gittings, J. O’Halloran, P.S. Giller and G.F. Smith. 2005. Structural indicators of spider communities across the forest plantation cycle. Forest Ecology and Management 212: 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.040
  33. Paoletti, M.G., M. Bressan and C.A. Edwards. 1996. Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of human disturbance. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 15: 21-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689609701935
  34. Park, Y.-S., Y.K. Park and H.M. Yang. 2016. Effects of clear-cutting on forest arthropod communities at two different vertical levels (crown and ground surface). Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 49: 271-278. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2016.49.4.271
  35. R Core Team. 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
  36. Rambo, T.R. and M.P. North. 2009. Canopy microclimate response to pattern and density of thinning in a Sierra Nevada forest. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.029
  37. Ricotta, C., M. Ferrari and G. Avena. 2002. Using the scaling behaviour of higher taxa for the assessment of species richness. Biological Conservation 107: 131-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00045-9
  38. Schowalter, T.D., J.W. Webb and D.A. Crossley. 1981. Communtiy structure and nutrient content of canopy arthropods in clearcut and uncut forest ecosystems. Ecology 62: 1010-1019. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937000
  39. Schowalter, T.D., Y.L. Zhang and J.J. Rykken. 2003. Litter invertebrate responses to variable density thinning in western Washington forest. Ecological Applications 13: 1204-1211. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-5187
  40. Seastedt, T.R. and D.A. Jr. Crossley. 1984. The Influence of arthropods on ecosystems. BioScience 34: 157-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1309750
  41. Sing, L., M.J. Metzger, J.S. Paterson and D. Ray. 2018. A review of the effects of forest management intensity on ecosystem services for northern European temperate forests with a focus on the UK. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research 91: 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx042
  42. Sullivan, T.P., D.S. Sullivan and M.F.L. Pontus. 2001. Stand structure and small mammals in young lodgepole pine forest: 10-year results after thinning. Ecological Applications 11: 1151-1173. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1151:SSASMI]2.0.CO;2
  43. Taki, H., T. Inoue, H. Tanaka, H. Makihara, M. Sueyoshi, M. Isono and K. Okabe. 2010. Responses of community structure, diversity, and abundance of understory plants and insect assemblages to thinning in plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 607-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.019
  44. Verschuyl, J., S. Riffell, D. Miller and T.B. Wigley. 2011. Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests - A meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.010
  45. Vesala, T., T. Suni, U. Rannik, P. Keronen, T. Markkanen, S. Sevanto, T. Gronholm, S. Smolander, M. Kulmala, H. Ilvesniemi, R. Ojansuu, A. Uotila, J. Levula, A. Makela, J. Pumpanen, P. Kolari, L. Kulmala, N. Altimir, F. Berninger, E. Nikinmaa and P. Hari. 2005. Effect of thinning on surface fluxes in a boreal forest. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 19: GB2001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002316
  46. Watt, A.D., N.E. Stork, C. McBeath and G.L. Lawson. 1997. Impact of forest management on insect abundance and damage in a lowland tropical forest in Southern Cameroon. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 985-998. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405288
  47. Yi, H. and A. Moldenke. 2005. Response of ground-dwelling arthropods to different thinning intensities in young Douglas fir forests of Western Oregon. Environmental Entomology 34: 1071-1080. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/34.5.1071
  48. Yi, H. and A. Moldenke. 2008. Responses of litter-dwelling arthropods to four different thinning intensities in Douglas-fir forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Annales Zoologici Fennici 45: 229-240, 212. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.045.0308