Archives of Craniofacial Surgery (대한두개안면성형외과학회지)

Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (대한두개안면성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recipient vessel selection for head and neck reconstruction: A 30-year experience in a single institution

  • Chung, Jae-Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Jae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Kwang-Yoon (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Kuk (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Park, Seung-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Eul-Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.07.13
  • Accepted : 2020.10.12
  • Published : 2020.10.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The advance in microsurgical technique has facilitated a proper approach for reconstruction of extensive head and neck defects. For the success of free tissue reconstruction, selection of the recipient vessel is one of the most important factors. However, the vascular anatomy of this region is very complex, and a clear guideline about this subject is still lacking. In this study, we present our 30 years of experiences of free tissue reconstruction for head and neck defects. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed a total of 138 flaps in 127 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction using free tissue transfer following tumor resection between October 1986 to August 2019. Patients who underwent facial palsy reconstruction were excluded. Medical records including patient's demographics, detailed operation notes, follow-up records, and photographs were collected and analyzed. Results: Among a total of 127 patients, 10 patients underwent a secondary operation due to cancer recurrence. The most commonly used type of flap was radial forearm flap (n=107), followed by the anterolateral thigh flap (n=18) and fibula flap (n=10). With regard to recipient vessels, superior thyroid artery was most commonly used in arterial anastomosis (58.7%), and internal jugular vein (51.3%) was the first choice for venous anastomosis. The flap survival rate was 100%. Four cases of venous thrombosis were resolved with thrombectomy and re-anastomosis. Conclusion: Superior thyroid artery and internal jugular vein were reliable choices as recipient vessels. Proper recipient vessel selection could improve the result of head and neck reconstruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516
  2. Serletti JM, Higgins JP, Moran S, Orlando GS. Factors affecting outcome in free-tissue transfer in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:66-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200007000-00012
  3. Colen LB, Stevenson A, Sidorov V, Potparic Z, Pacelli E, Searles J, et al. Microvascular anastomotic thrombosis in experimental diabetes mellitus. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:156-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199701000-00024
  4. Bengtson BP, Schusterman MA, Baldwin BJ, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Kroll SS, et al. Influence of prior radiotherapy on the development of postoperative complications and success of free tissue transfers in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Am J Surg 1993;166:326-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80325-3
  5. Moon KC, Lee JM, Baek SO, Jang SY, Yoon ES, Lee BI, et al. Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: a comparative study. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46:140-6. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00913
  6. Chang EI. Pharyngeal and esophageal reconstruction. In: Neligan PC, editor. Plastic surgery. 4th ed. New York; Elsevier Inc; 2013. p. 351-2.
  7. Nahabedian MY, Singh N, Deune EG, Silverman R, Tufaro AP. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:148-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000095409.32437.d4
  8. Chung SW, Byun IH, Lee WJ. Sequential reconstruction for recurrent head and neck cancer: a 10-year experience. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46:449-54. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00157
  9. Ross GL, Ang ES, Golger A, Lannon D, Addison P, Snell L, et al. Which venous system to choose for anastomosis in head and neck reconstructions? Ann Plast Surg 2008;61:396-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181629a91
  10. Liang J, Yu T, Wang X, Zhao Y, Fang F, Zeng W, et al. Free tissue flaps in head and neck reconstruction: clinical application and analysis of 93 patients of a single institution. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018;84:416-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.04.009
  11. Khouri RK. Avoiding free flap failure. Clin Plast Surg 1992;19:773-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30795-1
  12. Kanoh N, Dai CF, Ikeda N, Mimura O. Parameters for the preoperative evaluation of arteriosclerosis for free-flap transfers in head and neck surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000;25:135-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00343.x
  13. Yagi S, Suyama Y, Fukuoka K, Takeuchi H, Kitano H. Recipient vessel selection in head and neck reconstruction based on the type of neck dissection. Yonago Acta Med 2016;59:159-62.
  14. Yazar S. Selection of recipient vessels in microsurgical free tissue reconstruction of head and neck defects. Microsurgery 2007;27:588-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20407
  15. Shima H, Ohno K, Michi K, Egawa K, Takiguchi R. An anatomical study on the forearm vascular system. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996;24:293-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(96)80062-X
  16. Chou EK, Ulusal B, Ulusal A, Wei FC, Lin CH, Tsao CK. Using the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex vessel as a source of two independent flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:2059-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000210541.86837.66
  17. Colohan S, Maia M, Langevin CJ, Donfrancesco A, Shirvani A, Trussler AP, et al. The short- and ultrashort-pedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:331-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823ae9a3
  18. Swartz WM, Banis JC, Newton ED, Ramasastry SS, Jones NF, Acland R. The osteocutaneous scapular flap for mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:530-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198604000-00003
  19. Yamamoto Y, Nohira K, Kuwahara H, Sekido M, Furukawa H, Sugihara T. Superiority of end-to-side anastomosis with the internal jugular vein: the experience of 80 cases in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:88-91. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1998.3037
  20. Zhang F, Ho PR, Chin BT, Ozek C, Buncke HJ, Lineaweaver WC. Effect of vein grafting on the survival of microvascularly transplanted muscle flaps. Microsurgery 1996;17:512-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1996)17:9<512::AID-MICR6>3.0.CO;2-E
  21. Miller MJ, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Kroll SS. Interposition vein grafting in head and neck reconstructive microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 1993;9:245-52. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1006652
  22. Germann G, Steinau HU. The clinical reliability of vein grafts in free-flap transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 1996;12:11-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1006446
  23. Kim HS, Chung CH, Chang YJ. Free-flap reconstruction in recurrent head and neck cancer: a retrospective review of 124 cases. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21:27-34. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00738

Cited by

  1. Reconstruction of a pathologic fracture following osteomyelitis of the mandible using a fibula osteocutaneous flap vol.22, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00724
  2. Reconstructive methods to resolve intractable fistulas that develop after radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer vol.22, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00353