DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring improvement of curriculum on analysis of the connectivity between competencies, skills and achievement standards in 2015 revised mathematics curriculum for elementary school

2015 개정 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 역량, 기능, 성취기준 연계성 분석을 통한 교육과정 개선 방안 탐색

  • Lee, HwaYoung (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity)
  • Received : 2020.10.19
  • Accepted : 2020.11.12
  • Published : 2020.11.30

Abstract

In the 2015 revised math curriculum, core competencies have been embodied and presented as skills and achievement standards. In this study, I analyzed aspects of the link between competencies, skills and achievement standards in the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum for elementary schools. According to the study, six mathematics curriculum competencies were presented evenly as 'skills' in each content area of elementary school, but reflected some of the sub-components of the curriculum, and some of them were presented as 'skills' but not as 'achievement standards'. In addition, the types of skills reflected in the achievement standards varied greatly by content area, but a few of specific skills such as 'understand' were found to be highly emphasized. Based on this, several implications were derived to further improve the implementation of competencies. First, 'skill' should be presented in a more systematic way and with more validity of extraction. Second, the extent to which competencies are presented in the achievement standards should be discussed. Third, Mathematics skills should be presented differently by grade(cluster) in achievement standards, 'Guidelines for Teaching and Learning' and 'Guidelines for Assesment'. Fourth, competencies related to content shall be presented separately and in detail.

2015 개정 수학과 교육과정에서 교과 역량이 '기능'과 '성취기준'으로 구체화되어 제시됨에 따라, 본 연구에서는 2015 개정 초등학교 수학과 교육과정에서 역량, 기능, 성취기준의 연계 양상을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 여섯 가지의 수학과 역량은 '기능'으로 고르게 제시되었으나, '기능' 중 일부는 성취기준으로 제시되지 않았으며, '이해하기'와 같은 기능에 치중되는 것으로 나타났다. 연구 결과를 토대로 차기 수학과 교육과정의 역량 구현을 개선하기 위한 몇 가지의 시사점을 도출하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2015). v8.1 Australian Curriculum. Retrieved Oct. 15. 220. from www.austraiancurriculum.com.au
  2. British Columbia (2020). Math K-9-Curriculuar competencies. Retrieved Oct. 16. 2020., from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/sites/curriculum.gov.bc.ca/files/curriculum/continuous-views/en_math_k-9_curricular_competencies.pdf
  3. Jo, Y. D. & Yun, Y. S. (2014). A Comparison of the Mathematics Curriculum of Korea and Japan in Viewpoint of promotion of Key Competencies. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematic 24(1), 45-65.
  4. Kim, B. & Kim, Y. (2019). Analysis of the Relationship between Achievement Standards and Subject Competencies of the 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum: Focusing on Content system 'Skill'. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 19(18), 845-873.
  5. Kim, D. W., Park, K. M. & Park, M. (2015). A Survey to Investigate Teachers' Perception of Core Competencies and Affective Aspects in Mathematics. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics 17(1). 99-118.
  6. Kim, S. H., Park, K., Lee, H. C. (2015). An Exploration of International Trends about the Core Competencies in Mathematic Curriculum. Journal of Korea Society in Mathematics Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 54(1), 65-81.
  7. Kwon, J. R. (2020). International comparison of Ways in which Competencies is Reflected in mathematics Curriculum: Focused on France, Australia and British Columbia in Canada. Journal of Korea Society in Mathematics Education Series E: Communication of Mathematical Education, 34(2), 135-160.
  8. Lee, G. W., Jeong, Y. G., Min, Y. S., Lee, G. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, M. S., ... Kim, S. H. (2015). A Study on Development of the 2015 Revised Subject Curriculum draft II: A Study of National Curriculum Subject Control. CRC 2015-25-1. KICE.
  9. Lee, G. W., Jeong, Y. G., Seo, Y. J., Jeong, C. W., Choi, J. S., Park, M. H., ... Kim, S. H. (2014). A Study on the Guidelines for Subject curriculum Development. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation TRKO201500012775.
  10. Lee, H. Y. (2017). Study and International Comparison on the Meaning of 'Core Ideas' in Mathematics curriculum, Journal of Korea Society Educaitional Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics 19(3), 495-511.
  11. Lee, H. Y., Kwon, O. N., Oh, K. H., Yun, S. J., Han, C. L., Sum, E. (2016). Study on Development of 2015 Revised Mathematic Curriculum with English. KOFAC.
  12. Ministry of Education(2015a). Mathematics Curriculum. 2015-74(Book 8).
  13. Ministry of Education,(2015b). 2nd Draft of the 3rd subject curriculum development researcher's workshop for 2015 revised curriculum. Ministry of Education, KICE, KOFAC.
  14. Na, G. S., Park, M., Kim, D. W., Kim, Y., Lee, S. J. (2018). Exploring the Direction of Mathematics Education in the Future Age. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 28(4), 437-478. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.11.28.4.437
  15. Park, H. S., Na, G. S. (2010). Investigating on the Building of 'Mathematical Process', Journal of Korea Society in Mathematics Education Series E: Communication of Mathematical Education, 503-523.
  16. Park, K, M., Lee, H. C., Park, S. H., Kang, E. J., Kim S. H., Yim, H. M., ... Hwang, S. M. (2015). A Study of Development of draft on 2015 revised Mathematics Curriculum. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. BD15129995.
  17. Yang, S. H. (2019). The Reflective Consideration for the 'Content System' of 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum: Focused on 'Key Concept', "generalized Knowledge' and 'Skill', Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics 21(2) 347-367.

Cited by

  1. 초등학교 3~4학년군 수학 교과서에 의도된 교과 역량 분석 vol.24, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2021.24.1.21