Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on regional spatial information analysis platform about NTIS raw data

국가과학기술지식 원시데이터에 관한 지역 공간정보 분석 플랫폼 연구

  • 임정선 (한국과학기술정보연구원 R&D투자분석센터) ;
  • 김상국 (한국과학기술정보연구원 데이터분석플랫폼센터) ;
  • 배성훈 (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원) ;
  • 김광훈 (한국과학기술정보연구원 R&D투자분석센터) ;
  • 원동규 (한국과학기술정보연구원 R&D투자분석센터)
  • Received : 2020.09.14
  • Accepted : 2020.11.25
  • Published : 2020.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Due to the coronavirus pandemic and diplomatic disputes, governments are actively developing a policy to revitalize·reshore manufacturing and to diversify international cooperations. In order to develop such a policy, it is very important to compare and analyze domestic·international geospatial information. Over the decade, the US·EC governments have conducted a series of national researches to build data-based tools that can monitor·analyze regional geospatial information driven by government R&D investments. In the case of the EC system, it can compare geospatial information in domestic and international(including Korea) regions. Compared to US·EC cases, Korean examples of national researches with available data analplatform need future improvements. Current study is investigating an automated analysis methodologies using "National Institute of Science and Technology Information (NTIS)" DB, which was national security data until recently. Research on data-mining regional geospatial information can contribute to support policy fields that need to discover new issues in response to unexpected social problems such as recently faced corona and trade disputes.

코로나 팬더믹 및 외교적 분쟁 등으로 인해 각국 정부는 제조업 회귀 및 협력 다변화를 위해 노력하고 있으며, 유관 정책개발을 위한 자국·해외 지역간 혁신역량 비교분석을 필요로 하고 있다. 미국·유럽연합은 국가연구개발투자에 의해 유발되는 지역 공간정보를 분석하기 위해 데이터기반 분석 플랫폼을 개발·고도화하여 왔으며, 분석의 영역은 경쟁국들의 지역(대한민국의 도·광역시 등)을 포함한다. 한국은 세계적 수준의 국가연구개발 데이터베이스를 구축하여 왔으나, 미국·유럽연합과 비교할 수 있는 지역 공간정보 분석 플랫폼의 개발·활용 사례가 부족한 것이 현실이다. 최근 국내 정책현장에서 지역 공간정보의 수요가 늘고 있으며, 또한 공공데이터 개방정책으로 인하여 기존에는 불가능했던 현장수요 맞춤형 정보분석이 가능해졌다. 본 연구는 국가과학기술지식정보 원시데이터의 분석 자동화를 통해, 예측하기 어려운 사회현안(코로나 및 무역분쟁 등) 대응에 기여할 수 있는 현장수요 맞춤형 지역분석 구도를 개발하였다. 연구의 결과들은 지역의 공간정보를 활용해 신규 사회이슈에 대응하고자 하는 정책현장을 지원하는데 기여한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Economic Ministers' Meeting 18-3. 2018. Government R&D investment innovation plan to support innovative growth. Joint ministry of Korea Government.
  2. NTIS(National Science & Technology Information Service). 2020. [Internet]. [https://www.ntis.go.kr]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  3. Bae SH, Kim, JH, Yoon JS, Kang SK, Shin KM, Cho SJ, Lee KK. 2016. Measuring Efficiency of National R&D Programs within Nanotechnology Field Using DEA Model", J. Soc. Korea Ind. Syst. Eng, 39(2):64-71. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2016.39.2.064
  4. Jin HC, Kim EW. 2016. A Study on Development of Land Information Methodology. Journal of Cadastre & Land Informatix. 46(2):155-168. https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2016.46.2.155
  5. Lee JD, Oh DH. 2012. Theory of Efficiency Analysis: Data Envelopment Analysis. Jiphil Media, Seoul. pp.35-88.
  6. Oh CS. 2017. A Study on Improvement of Jeolla-Namdo Geographic Name Task. Journal of Cadastre & Land Informatix. 47(2):201-212. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2017.47.2.201
  7. Lee JE, Rho GI, Jang HM, Yu KU. 2016. System Design and Implementation for Building a Place Information based on Crowdsourcing Utilizing the Graph Data Model. Journal of Cadastre & Land Informatix. 46(1):117-131. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2016.46.1.117
  8. Lim JS, Shin KM, Yoon JS, Bae SH. 2015. Study of US/EU National Innovation Policies Based on Nanotechnology Development, and Implications for Korea, Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice. 3(1):50-65. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.1.4
  9. Lim JS, Hahn, H, Won DK, Kim SK. 2019. Study on Innovation Measurement of National R&D Investments for Nanotechnology Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society. 22(2):207-219. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2019.04.22.2.207
  10. Lim JS, Kim SG, 2020. Quantifying Innovation Characteristics of National R&D Investment through Cross-Cutting Data Analysis: Case Study on NTIS Nanotechnology. Journal of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. 45(2):13-23.
  11. Benchmarking. 2019. Benchmarking: Benchmark and Frontier Analysis Using DEA and SFA. [Internet]. [https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Benchmarking]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  12. Berwind K, Bornschlegl MX, Kaufmann M A, Hemmje M. 2016. Toward a Cross Industry Standard Process to Support Big Data Applications in Virtual Research Environments. Collaborative European Research Conference(CERC). pp.82-92
  13. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2(6):429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  14. Cernat L. (2020), Trade Policy Reflections Beyond the COVID19 Outbreak. Chief Economist Note. European Commission, Belgium
  15. EOP(Executive Office of President). 2013. National Network for Manufacturing Innovation: A Preliminary Design. The White House, USA.
  16. EOP. 2018. Strategy for American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing. The White House, USA.
  17. EC(European Commission). 2015a. Key Enabling Technologies(KETs); Time to act. European Commission. Brussels Belgium.
  18. EC. 2015b. Country Report South Korea: regional aspects of KETs deployment. European Commission. Brussels Belgium.
  19. EC. 2020a. What is Horizon 2020?. [Internet]. [https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/what-horizon-2020]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  20. EC. 2020b. KETs Tool. [Internet]. [https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/ketstools/]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  21. EC. 2020c. Innovation Radar. [Internet]. [https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/innovation-radar]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  22. EC. 2020d. Study on Cross-Cutting KETs. [Internet]. [https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/key-enabling-technologies/eu-actions/ ro-ckets_en]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  23. Federal RePORTER. 2020. Federal RePORTER. [Internet]. [https://federalreporter. nih.gov]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  24. HLEG(High-Level Expert Group). 2011. High-Level Expert Group on Key Enabling Technologies. European Commission. Brussels Belgium.
  25. Lane J. 2010a, Let's make science metrics more scientific. Nature. 464:488-489. https://doi.org/10.1038/464488a
  26. Lane J. Stefano B. 2010b. The STAR METRICS Project: Current and Future Uses for S&E Workforce Data. Science of Science Measurement Workshop of National Science Foundation.
  27. OECD(The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1996. The Knowledge-Based Economy. OECD Publications.
  28. OECD. 2013. Regions and innovation: Collaborating across borders. OECD Publications.
  29. OECD. 2018. Oslo Manual 2018. Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. OECD Publications.
  30. OECD. 2020. R&D Platform for Investment and Evaluation ("R&D PIE"). [Internet]. [https://oecd-opsi.org/innovations/rd-platform-for-investment-and-evaluation-rd-pie]. Last accessed 24 July 2020.
  31. The White House. 2011. A Strategy for American Innovation: Securing Our Economic Growth and Prosperity. The White House, Washington DC.
  32. The White House. 2015. A Strategies for AmericanInnovation. The White House, Washington DC.