References
- S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt, The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations, Administrative Sci. Quarterly 42 (1997), no. 1, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
- F. T. Rothaermel and D. L. Deeds, Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development, Strategic Manag. J. 25 (2004), no. 3, 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.376
- S. S. Levine and M. J. Prietula, Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance, Organization Sci. 25 (2013), no. 5, 1414-1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0872
- S. Chengalur-Smith and A. Sidorova, Survival of open-source projects: A population ecology perspective, in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., Seattle, WA, USA, 2003, 782-787.
- A. Lima, L. Rossi, and M. Musolesi, Coding together at scale: GitHub as a collaborative social network, in Proc. AAAI Int. Conf. Weblogs Social Media, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2014, pp. 31-40.
- S. R. Lee, H. M. Baek and J. J. Jahng, Governance strategies for open collaboration: Focusing on resource allocation in open source software development organizations, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37 (2017), no. 5, 431-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.006
- M. Markus. The governance of free/open source software project: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? J. Manag. Governance 11 (2007), no. 2, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9021-x
- W. Scacchi and C. Jensen, Governance in open source software development projects: Towards a model for network-centric edge organizations, DTIC Document, 2008.
- J. Hahn, J. Y. Moon, and C. Zhang, Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties, Inf. Syst. R. 19 (2008), no. 3, 369-391. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0192
- Z. L. He and P. K. Wong, Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis, Org. Sci. 15 (2004), no. 4, 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
- J. G. March, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Org. Sci. 2 (1991), no. 1, 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
- L. Dabbish et al., Social coding in GitHub: Transparency and collaboration in an open software repository, in Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, USA, Feb. 2012, pp. 1277-1286.
- B. Perens, The open source definition. Open sources: Voices from the open source revolution, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, USA, 1, 1999, pp. 171-188.
- G. Gousios and D. Spinellis, GHTorrent: GitHub's data from a firehose, in Proc. IEEE Working Conf. Mining Softw. Repositories, Zurich, Switzerland, June 2012, pp. 12-21.
- A. Kieser, N. Beck, R. Tainio, Rules and organizational learning: The behavioral theory approach, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (M. Dierkes, A. Antal, J. Child and I. Nonaka, eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
- B. Levitt and J. G. March, Organizational learning, Annu. Rev. Soc. 14 (1988), no. 1, 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
- N. Argyres, Capabilities, technological diversification and sivisionalization, Strategic Manag. J. 17 (1996), no. 5, 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199605)17:5<395::AID-SMJ826>3.0.CO;2-E
- G. Ahuja and C. M. Lampert, Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions, Strategic Manag. J. 22 (2001), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176
- M. J. Benner and M. Tushman, Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries, Administrative Sci. Quarterly 47 (2002), no. 4, 676-707. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094913
- G. Dowell and A. Swaminathan, Entry timing, exploration, and firm survival in the early US bicycle industry, Strategic Manag. J. 27, (2006), no. 12, 1159-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.563
- R. Katila and G. Ahuja, Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction, Academy Manag. J. 45 (2002), no. 6, 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
- A. Nerkar, Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge, Manag. Sci. 49 (2003), no. 2, 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.2.211.12747
- L. Rosenkopf and A. Nerkar, Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry, Strategic Manag. J. 22 (2001), no. 4, 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
- R. Belderbos et al., Technological activities and their impact on the financial performance of the firm: Exploitation and exploration within and between firms, J. Product Innovation Manag. 27 (2010), no. 6, 869-882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00757.x
- S. Jayanthi and K. K. Sinha, Innovation implementation in high technology manufacturing: A chaos-theoretic empirical analysis, J. Operat. Manag. 16 (1998), no. 4, 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00025-4
- A. Nerkar and P. W. Roberts, Technological and Product market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry, Strategic Manag. J. 25 (2004), no. 8-9, 779-799. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.417
- B. Van Looy, T. Martens, and K. Debackere, Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations, Creativity Innovation Manag. 14 (2005), no. 3, 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00341.x
- A. Phene, K. F. Lindquist, and L. Marsh, Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin, Strategic Manag. J. 27 (2006), no. 4, 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.522
- J. S. Sidhu, H. R. Commandeur, and H. W. Volberda, The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation, Org. Sci. 18 (2007), no. 1, 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0212
- F. Perretti and G. Negro, Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood, J. Organizational Behavior. 28 (2007), no. 5, 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.464
- J. A. Chatman, Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit, Academy Manag. Rev. 14 (1989), no. 3, 333-349. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279063
- M. Osterloh and S. Rota, Open source software development - Just another case of collective invention? Res Policy 36 (2007), no. 2, 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.004
- F. Rullani and L. Frederiksen, Individual interaction and innovation capabilities: Exploration and exploitation in open source software communities, in Proc. DRUID Summer Conf. Opening Innovation: Strategy, Organization Technol., London, UK, June 2010, pp. 1-52.
- J. Howison and K. Crowston, Collaboration through open superposition: A theory of the open source way, MIS Quarterly 38 (2014), no. 1, 29-50. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.02
- G. B. Voss and Z. G. Voss, Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains, Org. Sci. 24 (2013), no. 5, 1459-1477. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0790
- V. Gilsing and B. Nooteboom, Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology, Res. Policy 35 (2006), no. 1, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.06.007
- M. L. Tushman and C. A. O'Reilly III, Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, California Manag. Rev. 38 (1996), no. 4, 8-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
- D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, The myopia of learning, Strategic Manag. J. 14 (1993), no. S2, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
- A. E. Eiben and C. A. Schippers, On evolutionary exploration and exploitation, Fundamenta Informaticae 35 (1998), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-1998-35123403
- O. Baysal and A. J. Malton, Correlating social interactions to release history during software evolution, in Proc. Int. Workshop Mining Softw. Repositories, Mineapolis, MN, USA, May 2007, pp. 1-8.
- Q. Tu, Evolution in open source software: A case study, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Soft. Maintenance, San Jose, CA, USA, Oct. 2000, pp. 131-142.
- A. Mockus, R. T. Fielding, and J. Herbsleb, A case study of open source software development: The Apache server, in Proc. Int. Conf. Soft. Eng., Limerick, Ireland, June 2000, pp. 263-272.
- G. Ahuja and C. Morris Lampert, Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions, Strategic Manag. J. 22 (2001), no. 6-7, 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176
- K. Crowston, H. Annabi, and J. Howison, Defining open source software project success, in Proc. Intern. Conf. Inf. Syst., Seattle, WA, USA, Dec. 2003, pp. 1-14.
- H. Baek and S. Oh, Identifying the network characteristics of contributors that affect performance in open collaboration: Focusing on the GitHub open source, J. Soc. e-Business Studies 20 (2015), no. 1, 23-43. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2015.20.1.023
- V. Dhar and E. A. Chang, Does chatter matter? The impact of user- generated content on music sales, J. Interactive Marketing 51 (2009), no. 4, 300-307.
- W. Duan, B. Gu, and A. Whinston, The dynamic of online word-ofmouth and product sales: And empirical investigation of the movie industry, J. Retailing 84 (2008), no. 2, 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.005
- R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 51 (1986), no. 6, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Cited by
- 국가별 오픈소스 소프트웨어 개발자의 네트워크 특성이 개방형 협업 성과에 미치는 영향 : 약한 연결 이론을 중심으로 vol.29, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5859/kais.2020.29.2.149
- Avoiding collaborative paradox in multi‐agent reinforcement learning vol.43, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2021-0010