The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Learning Flow, Self-Directedness, Self-Regulated Learning Ability and Learning Achievement of Nursing Students who in Non-Face-To-Face Learning Environment

비대면 학습환경에서 간호대학생의 학습몰입, 자기 주도성, 자기조절학습능력 및 학업성취도

  • Received : 2021.10.18
  • Accepted : 2021.11.02
  • Published : 2021.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a descriptive investigative study to correlate of learning flow, self-directedness, self-regulated learning ability and learning achievement of nursing students who in non-face-to-face learning environment. The subjects of the study were 179 nursing college students based in B, G city, who collected data from September to October 2021. The data analysis used the SPSS 24.0 program and performed descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. As a result of the study, the average learning flow was 38.54±7.87 points, self-directedness was 134.83±19.81 points, self-regulated learning ability was 42.93±5.98 points and learning achievement was 15.03±2.56 points. The relationships among learning flow, self-directedness, self-regulated learning ability, and learning achievement showed significant positive correlations. Therefore, strategies to increase the learning achievement of nursing college students in a non-face-to-face environment, and environmental improvement and institutional support to increase learning flow are needed.

본 연구는 비대면 학습환경에서 간호대학생의 학습몰입, 자기 주도성, 자기조절학습능력 및 학업성취도의 상관관계를 파악하기 위한 서술적 조사 연구이다. 연구 대상은 B, G시에 소재하고 있는 간호대학생 179명으로 2021년 9월부터 10월까지 자료수집을 하였다. 자료 분석은 SPSS 24.0 프로그램을 사용하였으며, 기술통계, 상관관계 분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과 학습몰입 평균은 38.54±7.87이었고, 자기 주도성은 134.83±19.81, 자기조절학습능력은 42.93±5.98, 학업성취도는 15.03±2.56으로 나타났다. 학습몰입, 자기 주도성, 자기조절학습능력, 학업성취도는 모두 유의한 양의 상관을 보여주었다. 따라서 비대면 환경에서 간호대학생의 학업성취도를 높이기 위한 전략과 학습몰입을 높일 수 있는 환경 개선과 제도적인 지원이 필요하다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 2021학년도 광주대학교의 학술연구비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음

References

  1. Song, SY., Kim, HK. Exploring Factors Influencing College Students' Satisfaction and Persistent Intention to Take Non-Face-to-Face Courses during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Journal of Education. 2020;21(4):1099-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2020.12.21.4.1099
  2. Kwon, SH., Ryu, HS. In COVID-19, a study on the effects of professor and learner interaction, self-directed learning, and learning participation on learning satisfaction in untact lecture. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2021;21(11):87-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.11.87
  3. Han, SL., Lee, GY. Comparative Analysis of Instructors' Perception of Synchronous Online Classes: A Case Study of a University. Culture and Convergence. 2020;42(7):395-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2020.07.42.7.395
  4. Lee, EJ., Park, IW. Identifying Predictability of Computer Self-Efficacy, Teaching Presence and Learner Participation on Learner Satisfaction in Online Realtime Instruction. Journal of Yeolin Education. 2012;20(3):195-219.
  5. Han, JH. A Study on the Learners' Class Satisfaction in Synchronous Online Classes. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT). 2021;7(3):173-8. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2021.7.3.173
  6. Kim, BH., Jeong, MA., Kim, EJ. Satisfaction and Effectiveness of Online Classes of College Students in COVID-19. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 2021;21(5):767-80.
  7. Kim, SY., Shin NM. A study on online learner's 'other behaviors' and flow: comparing adolescents with adults. The Journal of Educational Information and Media. 2019;25(2):273-98. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.25.2.273
  8. Chei, MJ., Lee, JY. Analysis of Structural Relationship among Instructional Quality, Academic Emotions, Perceived Achievement and Learning Satisfaction in Offline and Online University Lectures. Journal of Educational Information and Media. 2017;23(3):523-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.23.3.523
  9. Mihaly C. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention: HarperPerennial; 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629704100309
  10. Kim, SH., Hahn, JS. Relations Among Learner's Personality Types, Self-Direction, Attitudes and Self-Efficacy toward Technology, and Achievement in Cyber University. Journal of Educational Information and Media. 2007;13(2):79-106.
  11. Jeong, EI. Development and Validation of a College Students' Self-directedness Scale. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2018;18(2):703-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.2.703
  12. Yang, MH. The study on the development and validation of self-regulated learning model (Unpublished doctor's dissertation). Seoul National University; 2000.
  13. Kim, AY., Tack, HY., Lee, CH. The Development and Validation of a Learning Flow Scale for Adults. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2010;24(1):39-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073909
  14. Lim, JH. Effects of online synchronous instructions on perceived academic achievement and learning satisfaction in higher education (Unpublished master's thesis). Seoul: Konkuk University; 2021.
  15. Kang, MS., Park, IW. The Exploratory Empirical Study of Learners' Perceived Interaction Factor Model between Learner and Instructor in e-Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Technology. 2010;26(2):187-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.26.2.187
  16. Cha, YM., Eom, WY. Structural Relations among Autonomy Support, Self-Determination Motivation, Self-Regulated Learning Ability and Learning Flow as Perceived by Junior College Students. Journal of Thinking Development. 2018;14(1):27-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51636/jotd.2018.03.14.1.27
  17. Lee, JG., Kim, WJ., Lee, JK. gave non-face-to-face online lectures. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial. 2020;21(11):412-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.11.412
  18. Bradbury NA. Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advances in physiology education. 2016;40(4):509-13. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016
  19. Russell JW. Learning preference for structure, self-directed learning readiness, and instructional methods: School of Education. University of Missouri-Kansas City; 1988.
  20. Crook J. A validation study of a self-directed learning readiness scale. SLACK Incorporated Thorofare, NJ; 1985.
  21. Chan T., Repman J. Flow in web based instructional activity: An exploratory research project. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 1999;5(3):225-37.
  22. Suh, HS. A Study on the Structural Equation Model for Factors Affecting Academic Achievement in Non-Face-to-Face Class. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT). 2020;6(4):157-64. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.4.157