DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Review of Ecological Niche Theory from the Early 1900s to the Present

생태적 지위(Ecological Niche) 이론에 대한 검토 및 제언

  • Koo, Kyung Ah (Korean Environment Institute, Water and Land Research Group, Division for Natural Environment) ;
  • Park, Seon-Uk (Div. of Restoration Strategy, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 구경아 (한국환경연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ;
  • 박선욱 (국립생태원 복원전략실)
  • Received : 2021.04.05
  • Accepted : 2021.07.20
  • Published : 2021.08.31

Abstract

This study reviewed the change of theory of ecological niche(concepts and definitions) over time to provide a theoretical basis for habitat-related studies of animals and plants. Accordingly, it analyzed and summarized the major discussion trends of ecological niche worldwide in each period from the 1900s to the present. Countries advanced in ecological studies, such as the EU and the USA, have conducted theoretical and empirical studies on the ecological niche since the early 1990s. The concept of the ecological niche was introduced in the early 1900s, developed in the mid-1900s, and advanced from the mid-1900s to the late 1900s. Since the 2000s, the advanced concept has diversified with new developments in technologies and research methods. The factors suggested by theoretical and empirical studies in defining the ecological niche of a species include 1) population dynamics of the target species, 2) all biotic conditions to sustain a population (food relationship and material flow in the food chain), 3) all non-biotic conditions to sustain a population (physical environmental conditions), 4) all direct and indirect interactions between these environmental factors, and 5) response and adaptation mechanisms that include the migratory ability of the target species or genetic diversity and adaptability to change. Unlike such international advancement, there have not been sufficient theoretical, philosophical, and empirical studies of ecological niche in Korea. The concepts and definitions by Greennell, Elton, and Hutchinson were selectively and partially borrowed for empirical studies without full description. Considering that the theory of ecological niche becomes the foundation for habitat-based species conservation and restoration, it is necessary to seek diversification and advancement of theoretical and empirical research and research methods and technological development. It will provide an important foundation for the academic advancement of ecology and for establishing and implementing policies to preserve and restore ecology and biodiversity effectively and successfully in Korea.

본 연구에서는 생태적 지위 이론(개념과 정의)의 시대별 변화를 검토하여 이를 바탕으로 동식물의 서식지 관련 연구에 이론적 토대를 제공하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 1900년대부터 현재까지 진행되고 있는 국내·외 생태적 지위에 대한 시대별 주요 논의 동향을 검토하고 분석·정리하였다. 생태학이 발달한 미국, 유럽 등에서는 생태적 지위 이론에 대한 이론적, 실증적 연구가 1900년대 초부터 현재까지 지속해서 이루어지고 있다. 특히, 1900년대 초를 생태적 지위 개념이 태동한 시기라고 한다면 1900년대 중반은 개념이 성장한 시기고, 1900년대 중반에서 후반까지는 개념이 고도화된 시기다. 이렇게 고도화된 개념은 2000년대 접어들어 다양한 기술과 연구 방법 및 분야의 발달에 따라 적용 분야에 따라 다양화가 진행되었다. 이러한 논의를 종합하면, 한 종의 생태적 지위를 정의하는데 고려되어야 할 요소는 1) 대상종의 개체군 동태, 2) 개체군을 유지할 수 있는 모든 생물적 환경 조건(먹이망 상의 먹이 관계와 물질 흐름), 3) 개체군을 유지할 수 있는 모든 비생물적 환경 조건(물리적 환경 조건), 4) 대상종과 생물, 비생물 환경 인자와 이들 환경 인자 간의 모든 직·간접적 상호작용, 5) 대상종의 이동 능력이나 유전적 다양성과 변화에 의한 적응력 등을 포함하는 대응 및 적응 메커니즘 등이었다. 국외의 상황과 달리 국내에서는 생태적 지위에 대한 충분한 이론적, 철학적, 실증적 고찰이 이루어지지 않았다. 그린넬, 엘튼, 허친슨에 의해 제시된 개념과 정의가 선택적으로 일부만 소개되거나, 용어에 관한 설명 없이 단순히 차용되고 있었다. 생태적 지위 이론이 서식지 기반의 생물종 보전과 복원을 위한 토대가 된다는 점에서 생태적 지위에 대한 이론적, 실증적 연구와 연구 방법의 다양화와 고도화 그리고 기술적 발전이 추진되어야 할 것이다. 이는 우리나라 생태학 분야의 학문적 발전뿐만 아니라 생태계와 생물다양성의 효과적이고 성공적인 보전 및 복원을 위한 정책 수립과 시행의 중요한 토대를 제공할 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 한국환경연구원(KEI)의 "국가생물다양성 전략-관리지표-이행평가-실효성평가 통합시스템 구축 방안 연구(과제번호: RE2021-13)"과제에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Botta-Dukat, Z.(2012) Co-occurrence-based measure of species' habitat specialization: Robust, unbiased estimation in saturated communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 23(2): 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01347.x
  2. Brett, J.R.(1971) Energetic responses of salmon to temperature. A study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerkd). American Zoologist 11(1): 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/11.1.99
  3. Buzhdygan, O.Y., B. Tietjen, S.S. Rudenko, V.A. Nikorych and J.S. Petermann(2020) Direct and indirect effects of land-use intensity on plant communities across elevation in semi-natural grasslands. PloS One 15(11): e0231122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231122
  4. Christensen, V. and D. Pauly(1992) ECOPATH II-a software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models and calculating network characteristics. Ecological Modelling 61(3-4): 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(92)90016-8
  5. Colwell, R.K. and D.J. Futuyma(1971) On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52(4): 567-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934144
  6. Connell, J.H.(1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: Evidence from field experiments. The American Naturalist 122(5): 661-696. https://doi.org/10.1086/284165
  7. Ducatez, S., R. Tingley and R. Shine(2014) Using species co-occurrence patterns to quantify relative habitat breadth in terrestrial vertebrates. Ecosphere 5(12): 1-12.
  8. Elton, C.(1927) Animal ecology 1927. Sidgwick and Jackson, London, 10pp.
  9. Etterson, J.R.(2004) Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. I. Clinal patterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the Great Plains. Evolution 58(7): 1446-1456. https://doi.org/10.1554/04-053
  10. Feinsinger, P., E.E. Spears and R.W. Poole(1981) A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62(1): 27-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936664
  11. Fridley, J.D., D.B. Vandermast, D.M. Kuppinger, M. Manthey and R.K. Peet(2007) Co-occurrence based assessment of habitat generalists and specialists: A new approach for the measurement of niche width. Journal of Ecology 95(4): 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01236.x
  12. Gause, G.F.(1932) Experimental studies on the struggle for existence: I. Mixed population of two species of yeast. Journal of Experimental Biology 9(4): 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.9.4.389
  13. Gause, G.F.(1934) The struggle for existence Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore, Maryland.
  14. Gibson-Reinemer, D.K.(2015) A vacant niche: How a central ecological concept emerged in the 19th century. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 96(2): 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.324
  15. Grinnell, J.(1904) The origin and distribution of the chest-nut-backed chickadee. The Auk 21(3): 364-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/4070199
  16. Grinnell, J.(1917) The niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. The Auk 34(4): 427-433. https://doi.org/10.2307/4072271
  17. Grinnell, J.(1924) Geography and evolution. Ecology 5(3): 225-229. https://doi.org/10.2307/1929447
  18. Guisan, A., R. Tingley, J.B. Baumgartner, I. Naujokaitis-Lewis, P.R. Sutcliffe, A.I.T. Tulloch, T.J. Regan, L. Brotons, E. McDonald-Madden, C. Mantyka-Pringle, T.G. Martin, J.R. Rhodes, R. Maggini, S.A. Setterfield, J. Elith, M.W. Schwartz, B.A. Wintle, O. Broennimann, M. Austin, S. Ferrier, M.R. Kearney, H.P. Possingham and Y.M. Buckley(2013) Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecology Letters 16(12): 1424-1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12189
  19. Heymans, J.J., M. Coll, J.S. Link, S. Mackinson, J. Steenbeek, C. Walters and V. Christensen(2016) Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management. Ecological Modelling 331: 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.007
  20. Holt, R.D.(2009) Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: Ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(Supplement 2): 19659-19665. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905137106
  21. Huey, R.B. and R.D. Stevenson(1979) Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: A discussion of approaches. American Zoologist 19(1): 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/19.1.357
  22. Hurlbert, S.H.(1978) The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59(1): 67-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936632
  23. Hutchinson, G.E.(1957) Cold spring harbor symposium on quantitative biology. Concluding Remarks 22: 415-427.
  24. Kazanci, C.(2007) EcoNet: A new software for ecological modeling, simulation and network analysis. Ecological Modelling 208(1): 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.031
  25. Lawlor, L.R.(1979) Direct and indirect effects of n-species competition. Oecologia 43(3): 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344961
  26. Levine, S.H.(1976) Competitive interactions in ecosystems. The American Naturalist 110(976): 903-910. https://doi.org/10.1086/283116
  27. Levins, S.R.(1968) Evolution in changing environments: Some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press.
  28. Luna, B. and J.M. Moreno(2010) Range-size, local abundance and germination niche-breadth in Mediterranean plants of two life-forms. Plant Ecology 210(1): 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9740-y
  29. MacArthur, R. and R. Levins(1964) Competition, habitat selection, and character displacement in a patchy environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 51(6): 1207-1210. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.51.6.1207
  30. Martins, R.P.(2017) To what degree are philosophy and the ecological niche concept necessary in the ecological theory and conservation? European Journal of Ecology 3(1): 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/eje-2017-0005
  31. McInerny, G.J. and R.S. Etienne(2012a) Ditch the niche-Is the niche a useful concept in ecology or species distribution modelling? Journal of Biogeography 39(12): 2096-2102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12033
  32. McInerny, G.J. and R.S. Etienne(2012b) Stitch the niche-A practical philosophy and visual schematic for the niche concept. Journal of Biogeography 39(12): 2103-2111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12032
  33. McInerny, G.J. and R.S. Etienne(2012c) Pitch the niche-Taking responsibility for the concepts we use in ecology and species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography 39(12): 2112-2118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12031
  34. Patten, B.C. and G.T. Auble(1981) System theory of the ecological niche. The American Naturalist 117(6): 893-922. https://doi.org/10.1086/283777
  35. Pauly, D., V. Christensen and C. Walters(2000) Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57(3): 697-706. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0726
  36. Pedruski, M.T., G.F. Fussmann and A. Gonzalez(2016) A network approach reveals surprises about the history of the niche. Ecosphere 7(3): e01266. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1266
  37. Pocheville, A.(2015) The ecological niche: History and recent controversies. In Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp.547-586.
  38. Polechova, J. and D. Storch(2008) Ecological niche. Encyclopedia of Ecology 2: 1088-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00811-9
  39. Polovina, J.J.(1984) An overview of the ECOPATH model. Fishbyte 2(2): 5-7.
  40. Pulliam, H.R.(1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. The American Naturalist 132(5): 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1086/284880
  41. Pulliam, H.R.(2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3(4): 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00143.x
  42. Quintero, I. and J.J. Wiens(2013) What determines the climatic niche width of species? The role of spatial and temporal climatic variation in three vertebrate clades. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22(4): 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12001
  43. Richardson, D.M. and R.J. Whittaker(2010) Conservation biogeography-foundations, concepts and challenges. Diversity and Distributions 16(3): 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00660.x
  44. Schneider, D.C.(2001) The rise of the concept of scale in ecology: The concept of scale is evolving from verbal expression to quantitative expression. BioScience 51(7): 545-553. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0545:TROTCO]2.0.CO;2
  45. Schoener, T.W.(1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. The American Naturalist 122(2): 240-285. https://doi.org/10.1086/284133
  46. Schramski, J.R., C. Kazanci and E.W. Tollner(2011) Network environ theory, simulation, and EcoNet® 2.0. Environmental Modelling & Software 26(4): 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.10.003
  47. Sexton, J.P., J. Montiel, J.E. Shay, M.R. Stephens and R.A. Slatyer(2017) Evolution of ecological niche breadth. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 48: 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-023003
  48. Sheth, S.N. and A.L. Angert(2014) The evolution of environmental tolerance and range size: A comparison of geographically restricted and widespread Mimulus. Evolution 68(10): 2917-2931. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12494
  49. Soberon, J.(2007) Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecology Letters 10(12): 1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x
  50. Ter Braak, C.J.(1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67(5): 1167-1179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938672
  51. Ter Braak, C.J.(1987) The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69(1): 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038688
  52. Tilman, D.(1987) The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competition. The American Naturalist 129(5): 769-774. https://doi.org/10.1086/284672
  53. Vandermeer, J.H.(1972) Niche theory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics: 107-132.
  54. Vandermeer, J.H.(1980) Indirect mutualism: Variations on a theme by Stephen Levine. The American Naturalist 116(3): 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1086/283637
  55. Whittaker, R.H., S.A. Levin and R.B. Root(1973) Niche, habitat, and ecotope. The American Naturalist 107(955): 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1086/282837
  56. Wiens, J.J. and C.H. Graham(2005) Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 519-539. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431