Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Principle of restoration ecology reflected in the process creating the National Institute of Ecology

  • Kim, A. Reum (Graduate School of Seoul Women's University, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Lim, Bong Soon (Graduate School of Seoul Women's University, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Seol, Jaewon (Graduate School of Seoul Women's University, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Chang Seok (Division of Chemistry and Bio-Environmental Sciences, Seoul Women's University)
  • Received : 2021.05.21
  • Accepted : 2021.07.08
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The creation of the National Institute of Ecology began as a national alternative project to preserve mudflats instead of constructing the industrial complexes by reclamation, and achieve regional development. On the other hand, at the national level, the research institute for ecology was needed to cope with the worsening conditions for maintaining biodiversity due to accelerated climate change such as global warming and increased demand for development. In order to meet these needs, the National Institute of Ecology has the following objectives: (1) carries out studies for ecosystem change due to climate change and biodiversity conservation, (2) performs ecological education to the public through exhibition of various ecosystem models, and (3) promotes regional development through the ecological industry. Furthermore, to achieve these objectives, the National Institute of Ecology thoroughly followed the basic principles of ecology, especially restoration ecology, in the process of its construction. We introduce the principles and cases of ecological restoration applied in the process. Results: We minimized the impact on the ecosystem in order to harmonize with the surrounding environment in all the processes of construction. We pursued passive restoration following the principle of ecological restoration as a process of assisting the recovery of an ecosystem degraded for all the space except in land where artificial facilities were introduced. Reference information was applied thoroughly in the process of active restoration to create biome around the world, Korean peninsula forests, and wetland ecosystems. In order to realize true restoration, we pursued the ecological restoration in a landscape level as the follows. We moved the local road 6 and high-voltage power lines to underground to ensure ecological connectivity within the National Institute of Ecology campus. To enhance ecological diversity, we introduced perch poles and islands as well as floating leaved, emerged, wetland, and riparian plants in wetlands and mantle communities around the forests of the Korean Peninsula in the terrestrial ecosystem. Furthermore, in order to make the public aware of the importance of the intact nature, the low-lying landscape elements, which have disappeared due to excessive land use in most areas of Korea, was created by imitating demilitarized zone (DMZ) landscape that has these landscape elements. Conclusions: The National Institute of Ecology was created in an eco-friendly way by thoroughly reflecting the principles of ecology to suit its status and thus the impact on the existing ecosystem was minimized. This concept was also designed to be reflected in the process of operation. The results have become real, and a result of analysis on carbon budget analysis is approaching the carbon neutrality.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a research grant from Seoul Women's University (2021).

References

  1. Aber JD. Restored forests and the identification of critical factors in species-site interactions. In: Jordan WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD, editors. Restoration ecology. A synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1987. p. 241-50.
  2. An JH, Lim CH, Lim YG, Nam KB, Lee CS. A review of restoration project evaluation and post management for ecological restoration of the river. Journal of Restoration Ecology. 2014;4:15-34 [Korean Literature].
  3. An JH, Lim CH, Lim YK, Nam KB, Pi JH, Moon JS, Bang JY, Lee CS. 2016. Development and application of a model for restoring a vegetation belt to buffer pollutant discharge. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 32:205-15. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2016.32.2.205
  4. Aronson J, Florest C, Le Floc'h E, Ovalle E, Pontanier R. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands. I. A view from the south. Restor Ecol. 1993;1:8-17 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.1993.tb.00004.x.
  5. Berger JJ. Ecological restoration and non-indigenous plant species: a review. Restor Ecol. 1993;1(2):74-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00012.x.
  6. Corbin JD, Robinson GR, Hafkemeyer LM, Handel SN. A long-term evaluation of applied nucleation as a strategy to facilitate forest restoration. Ecol Appl. 2016;26(1):104-14. 27039513. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0075.
  7. Doll BA, Grabow GL, Hall KR, Halley J, Harman WA, Jennings GD, et al. Stream restoration: a natural channel design handbook, NC Stream Restoration Institute. Raleigh: NC State University; 2003.
  8. Gann GD, Lamb D. Ecological restoration: a mean of conserving biodiversity and sustaining livelihoods (version 1.1). Society for Ecological Restoration International. Tucson, Arizona, USA: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland; 2006.
  9. Gann GD, McDonald T, Walder B, Aronson J, Nelson CR, Jonson J, et al. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restor Ecol. 2019;27(S1):S1-S46.
  10. Higgs E, Harris J, Murphy S, Bowers K, Hobbs R, Jenkins W, et al. On principles and standards in ecological restoration. Restor Ecol. 2018;26(3):399-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12691.
  11. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 1996;4(2):93-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00112.x.
  12. Holl KD, Crone EE, Schultz CB. Landscape restoration: moving from generalities to methodologies. Bioscience. 2003;53(5):491-502. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0491:LRMFGT]2.0.CO;2.
  13. von Holle B, Yelenik S, Gornish ES. Restoration at the landscape scale as a means of mitigation and adaptation to climate change. Current Landscape Ecology Reports. 2020;5(3):85-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-020-00056-7.
  14. Hough M. City form and natural process. London, UK: Croom Helm; 1984. p. 279.
  15. Kim GS, Lim YK, An JH, Lee JS, Lee CS. Carbon budget in campus of the National Institute of Ecology. KJEE. 2014;47(3):167-75. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2014.47.3.167.
  16. Kim AR, Lim BS, Seol J, Lim CH, You YH, Lee WS, et al. Diagnostic assessment and restoration plan for damaged forest around the Seokpo Zinc Smelter. Central Eastern Korea Forests. 2021;2021(12):663 https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060663.
  17. Lee CS. Why the central government has to manage the National Institute of Ecology? Korean J. Restor Ecol. 2011;2(2):101-9.
  18. Lee CS. Role and task of restoration ecology in changing environment. Natl Acad Sci. 2015;5:481-527 [Korean Literature].
  19. Lee CS, You YH. Creation of an environmental forest as an ecological restoration. The Korean Journal of Ecology. 2001;24:101-9.
  20. Lee CS, Cho HJ, Moon JS, Kim JE, Lee NJ. Restoration and landscape ecological design to restore Mt. Nam in Seoul, Korea as an ecological park. Kor J Ecol. 1998;21:723-33.
  21. Lee CS, You YH, Robinson GR. Secondary succession and natural habitat restoration in abandoned rice fields of central Korea. Restor Ecol. 2002;10:306-14 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2002.00003.x.
  22. Lee CS, Cho YC, Lee AN. Restoration planning for the Seoul metropolitan area, Korea. In: Carreiro MM, Wu J, Song YC, editors. Ecology, Planning, and Management of Urban Forests. New York, USA: Springer; 2008. p. 393-419.
  23. Lee CS, Jeong YM, Kang HS. Concept, direction, and task of ecological restoration. Journal of Restoration Ecology. 2011;2:59-71.
  24. Lim CH, Pi JH, Kim AR, Cho HJ, Lee KS, You YH, et al. Diagnostic evaluation and preparation of the reference information for river restoration in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;2021(18):1724 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041724.
  25. MacMahon JA. Disturbed lands and ecological theory: an essay about a mutualistic association. In: Jordan WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD, editors. Restoration ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1987. p. 221-40.
  26. McDonald T, Gann G, Jonson J, Dixon K. International standards for the practice of ecological. Soil-Tec, Inc.,© Marcel Huijser, Bethanie Walder. Washington, DC, USA: Society for Ecological Restoration; 2016.
  27. Menz MHM, Dixon KW, Hobbs RJ. Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science. 2013;339(6119):526-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228334.
  28. National Research Council (NRC). Committee on the Comparative Costs of Rock Salt, & Calcium Magnesium Acetate (CMA) for Highway Deicing. Highway deicing: comparing salt and calcium magnesium acetate (Vol. 235). Washington, DC, USA: Transportation Research Board; 1991.
  29. NIE (National Institute of Ecology). Operation plan of the National Institute of Ecology. Gwacheon: National Institute of Ecology; 2012.
  30. NIE (National Institute of Ecology). Another Korean Peninsula Ecosystem, National Institute of Ecology. Seocheon: National Institute of Ecology; 2020.
  31. Pfeifer M, Lefebvre V, Peres CA, Banks-Leite C, Wearn OR, Marsh CJ, et al. Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature. 2017 Nov 9;551(7679):187-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24457.
  32. SERI (Society Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group). The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. 2004. http://www.ser-rrc.org/resource/the-ser-international-primer-on/.
  33. Suding K, Higgs E, Palmer M, Callicott B, Anderson CB, Baker M, et al. Committing to ecological restoration: efforts around the globe need legal and policy clarification. Science. 2015;348:6235.
  34. Temperton VM, Higgs E, Choi YD, Allen E, Lamb D, Lee CS, et al. Flexible and adaptable restoration: an example from South Korea. Restor Ecol. 2014;22(3):271-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12095.
  35. Walker LR, Walker J, Hobbs RJ, editors. Linking restoration and ecological succession. New York, USA: Springer; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35303-6.