Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of the Effect of Technology Innovation Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability on Corporate Performance; Focused on Corporate Ppuri Companies in the Metropolitan Area

기술혁신 역량과 기술사업화 역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 - 수도권 소재 뿌리기업을 중심으로

  • Seo, Sun-Young (Department of Business Administration, Korea Polytechnic University) ;
  • Yoon, Sun-Jung (Department of Business Administration, Korea Polytechnic University) ;
  • Seo, Jong-Hyen (Department of Business Administration, Korea Polytechnic University)
  • 서선영 (한국산업기술대학교 디지털경영) ;
  • 윤선중 (한국산업기술대학교 디지털경영) ;
  • 서종현 (한국산업기술대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2021.11.18
  • Accepted : 2022.01.20
  • Published : 2022.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study empirically identified how technological innovation capability and technological commercialization capability affect management performance in the metropolitan area of Ppuri corporation. As results of the research analysis, First the average company performance in the field of new materials and platform processing technology was higher than that of the metal-oriented processing technology field. Second, technological innovation capability variables are included as R&D capability, technological innovation regime, and technological accumulation capability are shown the statistically significant on non-financial performance. Commercialization capability, producing capability, and marketing capability variable are statistically significant on financial performance.

본 연구는 뿌리기업의 기술혁신 역량과 기술사업화 역량이 기업성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지와 금속 중심 공정기술 분야와 신소재·플랫폼 공정기술 분야의 두 집단 간에 기업성과의 차이가 있는지를 실증적으로 규명하였다. 표본은 국가뿌리산업진흥센터 등의 자료를 이용하여 설문지 플랫폼을 통한 온라인 조사를 진행하였다. 분석 방법은 기초통계분석, 상관관계분석, 두 집단 간 평균 차이 분석, 다중회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구 분석 결과, 첫째, 금속중심 공정기술 분야보다 신소재 플랫폼 공정기술 분야가 기업성과 평균이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 기술혁신 체제, 기술축적 역량, 마케팅 역량, 생산화 역량이 비재무적 성과에 통계적으로 유의한 것으로 분석되었고, 연구개발 역량, 기술축적 역량, 제품화 역량, 마케팅 역량이 재무적 성과에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 공정기술 플랫폼 분야가 비재무적 성과에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. C. G. Goh, B. Y. Park & G. H. Kim.(2010). Survey study on the level / gap in technology of domestic root industry. 2010 Information analysis report, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy. (2012). Establishment of root industry ecology undergoing accompanied growth with key industries.
  3. Y. J. Kim & C. W. Lee. (2016). Effects of characteristics and technology development activities of root enterprises on the sales revenues: with focus on 4 city and provincial companies in Chungcheong Region. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(6), 3269-327.
  4. J. H. Cho. (2014). Current status of root industry and policy tasks, Issues and discussion points, 3.
  5. J. Y. Kim. (2013). Positioning strategy for activation of root industry. Industrial position, 51(18).
  6. G. W. Kim, J. M. Kim & J. S. Choi.(2014). Current status of small & medium root manufacturing industries enterprises and policy implications. Journal of Korea Enterprise Architecture Society, 11(4), 463-470.
  7. Collaboration of relevant government departments. (2020.7). Root 4.0 master plan for competitiveness strengthening.
  8. G. H. Ha. (2018). Current status of domestic root industry and considerations on promotional policies. Journal of Korean Society of Photographic Geography, 28(2), 43-56.
  9. National Statistical Office. (2020). Survey on actual status of root industries in 2019 & 2020.
  10. J. S. Lee, H. W. Lee, S. D. Kim & S. M. Lee. (2021). Analysis of current status of domestic root industry (2009~2018). Journal of Korea Foundry Society, 41(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.7777/JKFS.2021.41.1.26
  11. J. W. Jeong. (2018). Study on factors of comprehensive competitiveness that affect management performances of domestic root industry companies. Master's degree graduation thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  12. Y. T. Kim.(2015). Case study on root industry in Banwol Industrial Estate. Journal of Korea Management Society. 28(6), 1747-1763.
  13. B. Y. Song, J. Y. Hong, S. M. Gil, J. G. Heo & J. P. Ahn. (2012). Means of expanding basic technology foundation for cultivation of root industry. Policy focus, 1-37.
  14. S. Y. Hong, B. S. Kim.(2017). Study on current status of root industry and promotional policy for root industry. Journal of Korean Society of Safety and Management, 19(1), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2017.19.1.191
  15. Y. S. Kim. (2013). Means of establishment of statistical indices for cultuvation of root industries in Gyeongnam. Study on key policies, 1-153.
  16. J. W. Kim. (2014). Cultivation of root industries for advancement of manufacturing companies in Busan. BDI Focus, Issue No. 248, Busan Advancement Research.
  17. U. S. Baek. (2016). Analysis of characteristics of root technology-based companies in Chungnam Region. Strategy study of Chungnam Research Instituted, 2016-14.
  18. J. G. Park & W. J. Lee. (2017). Study on the direction of advancement of root industry, with focus on Chungbuk Region. Collection of treatises on economy and commerce, 10(1), Management & Economy Research Institute of Chengju University.
  19. G. T. Lee. (2017). Study on current status of support policies for and means of cultivation of root industries in Daejeon. Graduate School of Business Administration of Hannam University.
  20. W. T. Yang. (2019). Direction for pursuing of advancement of root industry to cope with crisis of manufacturing industry in Jeonbuk. Issue Briefing, Book, 199, 1-15.
  21. I. S. Gu & T. S. Kim. (2013). Effects of quality management activities on management performances in domestic root industry. Journal of Society of Safety Management, 15(4), 269-278.
  22. C. W. Chae & Y. J. Park.(2017). Study on the relationshp between performances and personnel resources management of small & medium enterprises: with focus on root industries. Humanities and Society 21, 8(4), 633-652.
  23. S. H. Shin & Y. J. Park. (2019). Effects of sincerity leadership of root companies on the performances within the role of ther members: Analysis of effects of adjustment of foreigners and locals. Digital Convergence Research, 17(6), 93-104
  24. T.Y. Sin & H. H. Kim.(2016). Technology innovation format and decision making factors of companies. Policy research 2006-12, 17-49.
  25. F. Damanpour & W. M. Evan. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393031
  26. D. S. Lee. (2008). Study on the effects of technology innovation capabilities and technology commercialization capabilities of small & medium enterprises of Korea on management performances. Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Soongsil University.
  27. S. H. Ahn. (2013). Study on the effects of technological entrepreneurship on technology innovation and commercialization capabilities: with focus on the adjustment effects of emotional intelligence. Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Kumoh National Institute of Technology.
  28. J. J. Song.(2015). Method of SPSS/AMOS statistical analysis necessary in writing thesis. Seoul: 21 st Century Company.
  29. C. Freeman. (1991). Networks of innovators:A synthesis of research issures. Research Policy, 20(5), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
  30. S. G.Park. (2015). Effects of recognition of the usefulness of R&D support of technology start-up company on technology innovation and commercialization capabilities. Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Kyungil University.
  31. G. H. Rhyu. (2016). Effects of technology innovation and commercialization capabilities, and level of focus on R&D on performances of R&D: with focus on technology innovation type small & medium enterprises (electrical and electronic telecommunication). Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Anyang University.
  32. J. I. Jeon. (2019). Study on the effects of absorption, technology innovation and commercialization capabilities of small & medium enterprises on new product development performances. Ph.D. degree thesis of Myongji University.
  33. K. B. Clark & T. Fujimoto.(1991). Measuring the performance of emerging business: A validation commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<169::AID-SMJ801>3.0.CO;2-#
  34. J. Y. Won.(2011). Study on the effects of technology innovation and commercialization, and market-orientation on management performances. Master's degree thesis of Graduate School of Changwon National University.
  35. H. G. Grabowski & D. C. Miller.(1978). Industrial research and development intangibles capital.
  36. T. J. Gerpott. (1999). Strategischs technologie und innovations management. Stuttgart: Schafer Poeschel.
  37. K. Brackhoff. (1994). Forschung und entwicklung, 4, Auflage, Munchun: Oldenbourg.
  38. M. Almus & D. Czarnitzki. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(2), 226-236. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500103288618918
  39. T. M. Nevens, G. L. Summe & B. Uttal.(1990). Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do. Havard Business Review, May-June.
  40. W. Mitchell & K. Singh. (1996). Survial of business using collaborative relationship to.
  41. D. L. Rourke. (1999). From Invention to Innovation. US Department of Energy, Washington D. C., August.
  42. V. Kumar & P. Jain.(2002). Commercializing new technologies in India: a perspective on policy initiatives. Technology in Society, 24(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00009-X
  43. OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual.
  44. A. Cornford. (2004). Innovation, Commercialization and Knowledge Based Economic.
  45. I. B. Son. (2018). Effects of absorption and technology commercialization capabilities of small & medium enterprises on product competitiveness: with focus on the adjustment effects of small & medium entrepreneurship. Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Hoseo University.
  46. L. E. Westphal, L. Kim & C. J. Dahlman. (1985). Reflections on the Republic of Korea's acquisition of technological capability. in N.Rosenberg and C. Frischtak(2eds.), International Technology Transfer : Conceppts, Measures, and Comparison, Praeger : New York, 162-221.
  47. S. J. Cho. (2015). Effects of R&D and commercialization capabilities of organization on patent right utilization performances. Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Dankook University.
  48. E. S. Yoon & G. L. ilien. (1985). New industrial product performance: The effect of market characteristics and strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(3), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.230134
  49. X. M. Song & M. E. Parry. (1997). The determinants of the Japanese new product success. Journal of Marketing Research. 34(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152065
  50. Y. Wind. (2005). Marketing as an Engine of Business Growth: a Cross-functional Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 863-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.01.002
  51. B. S. Goh. (2004). Empirical study on the management performance decision-making factor of venture company. Ph.D. degree thesis of Aju University.
  52. N. Venkataraman & V. Ramanujam. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1986.4283976
  53. R. W. Stuart & P. A. Abetti. (1987). Start-up Venture: towards the prediction of initial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90010-3
  54. D. J. Lee. (2002). Study on the market and technology innovation orientedness, leading variables and performances of venture companies. Ph.D. degree thesis of Konkuk University.
  55. H. S. Yang. (2002). Empirical study on the success factors of venture companies in Korea. Ph.D. degree thesis of Incheon National university.
  56. J. J. Park, T. S. Kim & Y. R. Song. (2016). Effects of technology innovation capabilities of small & medium enterprises on management performances. Electronic Accounting Research, 14(2), 93-115.
  57. S. W. Shin. (2019). Effects of technology innovation capabilities on management performances - with focus on the adjustment effects of technology commercialization capabilities, 38(1), 225-239.
  58. I. G. Lee & D. W. Yang. (2016). Empirical study on the effects of technological capabilities of CEO on management performances. Venture business start up research, 11(2), 167-182.
  59. Y. H. Lee. (2017). Study on the structural relationship among commercialization capabilities, technological competitiveness, financial soundness and default risks of technological startup company. Domestic Ph.D. degree thesis, Hoseo University.
  60. J. S. Lee. (2016). Study on effects of technological finance on technological innovation capabilities and management performances of small & medium enterprises. Domestic Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Technological Management of Korea University, 2017, Seoul.
  61. J. J. Kim. (2014). Impact of the Investment of Venture Capitals on the Performance of SMEs. Doctoral dissertation, Hoseo University.
  62. T. Reichstein & M. Jensen. (2005). Firm Siz and Firm Growth Rate Distribution-the Case of Denmark. Ind. Corp. Change, 14(6), 1145-1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth089
  63. U. S. Hong, C. S. Song & S. T. Kim (2015). Study on the growth of employment for each company scale by utilizing quarterly regression analysis. Industrial economic study, 28(2), 653-675.
  64. W. Park, E. J. Kim & H. Y. Park. (2016). Analysis of factors affecting the decision making of small & medium enterprises in ICT area on industry-research institute collaboration research. Small & Medium Enterprises Research, 38(2), 22-44.
  65. S. H. Park & H. H. Shin. (2013). Study on the characteristics of Gazelles. Small & Medium Enterprises Research, 35(1), 1-24.
  66. Competitiveness. GT Management Ltd., Northampton, 51.
  67. K. Thomas. (2000). Creating regional cultures of innovation? The regional innovation strategies in England and Scotland. Regional Studies, 34(2), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050006104
  68. H. D. Yoon & R. B. Seo. (2011). Study on core factors that affect technological management performances of technology innovation type small & medium enterprises. Technology Innovating Research, 18(1), 111-144.
  69. S. H. Han & C. M. Heo. (2020). Effects of information orientedness and technology commercialization capabilities on technology performances: with focus on the mediating effect of technology commercialization capabilities and adjustment effects of technology accumulation capabilities. Venture business startup research, 15(1), 167-184
  70. P. S. Seong. (2019). Study on the relationship between the decision making factors of technological innovation capabilities and commercialization, and corporate performances of pharmaceutical companies. Ph.D. degree thesis of Graduate School of Kyunghee University.
  71. S. A. Zahra & W. C. Bogner. (2000). Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance- A study of corporate - sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 135-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00009-3
  72. Hamel & Praharad. (1990). Strategic intent. Mckinsey quarterly.
  73. C. M. Gu & G. C. Nam. (2002). Study on the effects of virtual market environment on strategy selection, and relationship between fundamental strategy and performances - with focus on online dot-com companies -. Sogang Management Treatises Collection, 13(2), 67-92.