DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of note-taking strategy on blended learning adult nursing education

노트필기 전략이 블랜디드러닝 성인간호학 교육에 미치는 효과

  • Gu, Hye-Ja (Department of Nursing Science, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Lee, Oi-Sun (Department of Nursing, Gyeongnam Geochang University)
  • 구혜자 (경성대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 이외선 (경남도립거창대학 간호학과)
  • Received : 2021.12.20
  • Accepted : 2022.02.20
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

This study was attempted to analyze the effect of a note-taking strategy applied to blended learning adult nursing education. Data were collected from September 17 to October 15, 2021, and analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 26.0 program with a single group pre/post design targeting 33 nursing students. As a main result, learning motivation rose from 3.27 before class to 3.40 after class, but there was no significant difference(t=-1.501, p=.143), and class participation significantly increased from 2.95 before class to 3.27 after class(t=-2.669, p=.012). Motivation for learning before class was pre-class participation(r=.838, p<.001), learning motivation after class(r=.545, p=.001), and class participation after class(r=.462, p=.007) and each showed a significant positive correlation. Learning motivation and class participation according to gender(Wilks'𝛌=.866), class interest(Wilks'𝛌=.632), and class satisfaction(Wilks'𝛌=.822) were all higher than the significance level of .05, so they were no significant difference. Based on these results, applying a note-taking strategy to blended learning adult nursing education was effective in improving class participation. In a future study, it is necessary to verify the effectiveness by applying a note-taking strategy customized according to academic achievement.

본 연구는 블랜디드러닝 성인간호학 교육에 노트필기 전략을 적용하여 그 효과를 분석하고자 시도되었다. 33명의 간호대학생을 대상으로 단일 집단 사전·사후 설계로 하여, 2021년 9월 17일부터 10월 15까지 자료 수집 후 SPSS/WIN 26.0으로 분석하였다. 주요 결과로 학습동기는 수업 전 3.27에서 수업 후 3.40점으로 상승하였으나 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았고(t=-1.501, p=.143), 수업 참여도는 수업 전 2.95점에서 수업 후 3.27점으로 유의하게 상승하였다(t=-2.669, p=.012). 수업 전 학습동기는 수업 전 참여도(r=.838, p<.001), 수업 후 학습동기(r=.545, p=.001), 수업 후 참여도(r=.462, p=.007)와 각각 유의한 양의 상관관계를 보였다. 성별(Wilks'𝛌=.866), 수업 흥미(Wilks'𝛌=.632)와 수업 만족도(Wilks'𝛌=.822)에 따른 학습동기 및 수업 참여도는 모두 유의수준 .05보다 크므로 유의한 차이는 없었다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 블랜디드러닝 성인간호학 교육에 노트필기 전략을 적용한 것은 수업 참여도를 향상시키는데 효과가 있었으며, 추후 학업 성취에 따른 맞춤형 노트필기 전략을 적용하여 효과를 검증할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. S. Kwan. (2020). Eine studie uber die einflussfaktoren auf das effektive lehren und lernen in der kontaktfreien lernsituation. Deutsch als Fremdsprache in Korea, 47, 5-28. DOI : 10.31302/KGDaF.47.1
  2. I. Y. Kim. (2021). A study on the satisfaction and perception of high school students on blended music learning in face-to-face and non-face-to-face. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(18), 227-240. DOI : https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.18.227
  3. O. S. Lee & Y. G. Noh. (2021). The effect of the blended learning and case-based learning on learning strategies, critical thinking disposition, academic self-efficacy of nursing students. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(11), 373-379. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2021.19.11.373
  4. A. Vallee, J. Blacher, A. Cariou & E. Sorbets. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e16504(1-9). DOI : 10.2196/16504
  5. M. C. Saiz-Manzanares, M. Escolar-Llamazares & A. A. Gonzalez. (2020). Effectiveness of blended learning in nursing education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1589(1-15). DOI : 10.3390/ijerph17051589
  6. K. McCutcheon, P. O'Halloran & M. Lohan. (2018). Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisor skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 82, 30-39.  DOI : 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.005
  7. D. M. Leidl, L. Ritchie & N. Moslemi (2020). Blended learning in undergraduate nursing education - A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 86, 104318. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104318
  8. M. H. Kang. (2021). Nursing students' self-directed learning experience in online learning. Journal of digital convergence, 19(10), 521-533. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.10.521
  9. J. S. Lee & S. H. Kim. (2020). The relationship of learning motivation, self-directed learning ability and critical thinking disposition of nursing students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(23), 937-952. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.23.937
  10. H. J. Park & S. B. Cha. (2020). A case study on using learning strategies of learner in college. Culture and Convergence, 42(5), 207-227. DOI : https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2020.05.42.5.207
  11. M. Y. Ahn & H. J. Park. (2019). Comparison of learning strategies for international students - Focusing on the note-taking strategy education for international students of K university. Culture and Convergence, 41(4), 1009-1030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2019.08.41.4.1009
  12. T. W. Kwon, H. I. Kim, H. R. Kim, K. J. Baek, K. B. Sung, D. G. Lee, J. H. Jang, S. Y. Chae & Elementary online class method research group. (2020). Elementary participatory online class A2Z. Seoul : Hagisiseub.
  13. Y. R. Kim. (2000). An analysis on the validation of school learning motivation scale(A) school-related coping scale(B) and relations between (A) & (B). Journal of Educational Studies, 17, 3-37.
  14. M. J. Cha et al. (2010). A development of learner participation scale in instruction. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 22(1), 195-219. DOI : 10.17927/tkjems.2010.22.1.195
  15. J. H. Lim. (2014). Construction of a structural model about nursing students' academic motivation, ego-resilience, and satisfaction in major. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 16(4), 2273-2284.
  16. M. E. Kim, M. J. Kim, Y. I. Oh & S. Y. Jung. (2020). The effect of online substitution class caused by Coronavirus(COVID-19) on the learning motivation, instructor-learner interaction, and class satisfaction of nursing students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 519-541. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.17.519
  17. H. R. Nam & M. K. Kim. (2021). Influence of career identity, learning motivation, communication skill on nursing professionalism in nursing students. The Journal of Korean Nursing Research, 5(3), 25-35. DOI : https://doi.org/10.34089/jknr.2021.5.3.25
  18. M. K. Cho & M. Y. Kim. (2017). Effects of learner motivation and teacher-student interaction on learner satisfaction in nursing students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(4), 468-477. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.04.468
  19. S. H. Park & S. I. Han. (2020). Differences of learning motivation among university students according to their previous online learning experience under the COVID-19 situation. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(21), 911-934. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.21.911
  20. J. Y. Kim & J. R. Kim. (2021). Effect of nursing student's learning motivation and self-directed learning in pediatric nursing online class based on the ARCS model. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(22), 77-87. DOI : https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.22.77
  21. N. Y. Lee & J. Y. Han. (2017). Nursing students' learning motivation, class participation, and class satisfaction on flipped class and teacher-centered class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(8), 253-267. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.8.253
  22. J. S. Lee & S. H. Kim. (2020). The relationship of learning motivation, self-directed learning ability and critical thinking diposition of nursing students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(23), 937-952. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.23.937
  23. I. H. Jo & J. H. Kim. (2020). Relationships among learning motivation, cognitive load, and academic achievement in a video learning and an objective measurement of attention. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(24), 571-588. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.24.571
  24. O. B. Kim & Y. B. Cho. (2019). Analyze the affective and learning strategy difference of engineering students under academic probation and other college students. Journal of Practical Engineering Education, 11(1), 25-31. DOI : https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2019.025
  25. S. A. Song. (2020). A study on flip learning design strategies using cornell notes and team discussion. Korean Business Education Review, 35(1), 315-336. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2020.35.1.315
  26. S. Kang. (2018). A study on learning attitude, class participation, and learning satisfaction of nursing students in fundamental nursing curriculum. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(4), 289-297. DOI : https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.4.289
  27. I. S. Lee. (2021). Effect of self-efficacy, self-regulated learning ability, learner participation on on-line class satisfaction of nursing students. Journal of the Korean Society for Multicultural Health, 11(1), 47-55. DOI : https://doi.org/10.33502/JKSMH.11.1.047
  28. S. G. Kim. (2015). Effects of a simulation-based high-risk neonatal care education on learning satisfaction, class participation, learning motivation and clinical competency in nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 16(10). 6807-6815. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2015.16.10.6807
  29. S. E. Lee & Y. M. Kim. (2018). The effects of PBL class on university student's creative problem solving competence, self-efficacy and class participation. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 28(2), 73-89. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.2.201806.73
  30. S. M. Lee & K. L. Kim. (2021). A study on factors affecting the satisfaction of non-face-to-face class in a university: Focusing on the mediating effect of class participation. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 33(2), 341-361. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2021.33.2.341
  31. M. S. Kim & D. J. Lee. (2018). Effects of class contexts on students' goal-orientation and academic efforts in college: Investigated by hierarchical linear regression modeling. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(20), 1043-1073. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.20.1043
  32. D. K. Lim, H. S. Kwon & W. J. Oh. (2016). The influence of major selection motive on major satisfaction, instruction participation, employability, employment strategies, major hope for employment - In case of students who are majoring in tax and accounting -. The Journal of Employment and Career, 6(4), 85-109. DOI : 10.35273/jec.2016.6.4.005
  33. Y. H. Choi. (2018). The study on the class participation, attitudes and scores on formative assessment, and academic achievement in the liberal arts education. Korean Journal of General Education, 12(4), 267-283.
  34. K-A. Berga et al. (2021). Blended learning versus face-to-face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 96, 1-6. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622
  35. K. Bornkamm et al. (2021). Teaching the neurologic examination: A prospective controlled study to compare a blended learning approach with face-to-face instruction. Neurology, 97(20), e2032-e2038. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012851
  36. E. Alshawish, M. M. El-Banna & I. Alrimawi. (2021). Comparison of blended versus traditional classrooms among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 106, 105049. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105049
  37. W. Liu et al. (2021). Determining the effects of blended learning using the community of inquiry on nursing students' learning gains in sudden patient deterioration module. Nursing Open, 8(6), 3635-3644. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1002/nop2.914
  38. M. Matsuda & A. Kohno. (2021). Development of a blended learning system for nurses to learn the basics of psychoeducation for patients with mental disorders. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-10. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1186/s12912-021-00677-1
  39. M. Ceulemans, S. Liekens, K. V. Calsteren, K. Allegaert & Foulon, V. (2021). Impact of a blended learning program on community pharmacists' barriers, knowledge, and counseling practice with regard to preconception, pregnancy and lactation. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 17(7), 1242-1249. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.09.009
  40. Z. Yu et al. (2021). Effects of blended versus offline case-centered learning on the academic performance and critical thinking ability of undergraduate nursing students: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Nurse Education in Practice, 53, 103080. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1016/j.ne pr.2021.103080
  41. C. Nagaraj, S. B. Yadurappa, L. T. Anantharaman, Y. Ravindranath & N. Shankar. (2021). Effectiveness of blended learning in radiological anatomy for first year undergraduate medical students. Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy, 43(4), 489-496. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1007/s00276-020-02572-x
  42. H. K. Gronlien, T. E. Christoffersen, O. Ringstad, M. Andreassen & R. G. Lugo. (2021). A blended learning teaching strategy strengthens the nursing students' performance and self-reported learning outcome achievement in an anatomy, physiology and biochemistry course - A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education in Practice, 52, 1-6. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103046
  43. N. T. T. Thai, B. D. Wever & M. Valcke. (2020). Face-to -face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397-411. DOI : http://lps3.doi.org.libproxy.ks.ac.kr/10.1111/jcal.12423