Journal of Chest Surgery

The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (대한심장혈관흉부외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Patients with Traumatic Shock: A Single-Center 5-Year Experience

  • Gyeongho Lee (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Dong Hun Kim (Department of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Dae Sung Ma (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Seok Won Lee (Department of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Yoonjung Heo (Department of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Hancheol Jo (Department of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Sung Wook Chang (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.09.22
  • Accepted : 2022.12.06
  • Published : 2023.03.05
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has recently gained popularity as an adjunct to resuscitation of patients with traumatic shock. However, the effectiveness of REBOA is still debated because of inconsistent indications across centers and the lack of medical records. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of REBOA by analyzing clinical results from a single center. Methods: This study included 96 patients who underwent REBOA between August 2016 and September 2021 at a regional trauma center according to the center's treatment algorithm for traumatic shock. Medical records, including the time of the decision to conduct the REBOA procedure, time of operation, type of aortic occlusion, and clinical outcomes, were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified by REBOA protocol (group 1, 2, or 3) and survival status (survivor or non-survivor) for analysis. Results: The overall success rate of the procedure was 97.9%, and the survival rate was 32.6%. In survivors, blood pressure was higher than in non-survivors both before the REBOA procedure (p=0.002) and after aortic occlusion (p=0.03). The total aortic occlusion time was significantly shorter (p=0.001) and the proportion of partial aortic occlusion was significantly higher (p=0.014) among the survivors. The non-survivors had more acidosis (p<0.001) and higher lactate concentrations (p<0.001) than the survivors. Conclusion: REBOA may be a feasible bridge therapy for resuscitation of patients with traumatic shock. Prompt and accurate decision-making to perform REBOA followed by damage control surgery could improve survival rates and clinical outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. The Committee on Trauma. Advanced trauma life support: student course manual. 10th ed. Chicago (IL): American College of Surgeons; 2018.
  2. Kim DH, Chang SW, Matsumoto J. The utilization of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: preparation, technique, and the implementation of a novel approach to stabilizing hemorrhage. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:5550-9. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.08.71
  3. Stannard A, Eliason JL, Rasmussen TE. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct for hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma 2011;71:1869-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823fe90c
  4. Belenkiy SM, Batchinsky AI, Rasmussen TE, Cancio LC. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control: past, present, and future. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;79(4 Suppl 2):S236-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000770
  5. Bekdache O, Paradis T, Shen YB, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): indications: advantages and challenges of implementation in traumatic non-compressible torso hemorrhage. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2019;4:e000262. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000262
  6. DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, Brenner M, et al. The AAST prospective Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry: data on contemporary utilization and outcomes of aortic occlusion and resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;81:409-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001079
  7. Matsumoto J, Lohman BD, Morimoto K, Ichinose Y, Hattori T, Taira Y. Damage control interventional radiology (DCIR) in prompt and rapid endovascular strategies in trauma occasions (PRESTO): a new paradigm. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015;96:687-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.06.001
  8. McGreevy DT, Abu-Zidan FM, Sadeghi M, et al. Feasibility and clinical outcome of REBOA in patients with impending traumatic cardiac arrest. Shock 2020;54:218-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001500
  9. Jung K, Lee JC, Kim J. Injury severity scoring system for trauma patients and trauma outcomes research in Korea. J Acute Care Surg 2016;6:11-7. https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2016.6.1.11
  10. Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, Moore EE, et al. Trauma. 9th ed. New York (NY): McGraw Hill; 2020.
  11. Horer T. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and endovascular resuscitation and trauma management (EVTM): a paradigm shift regarding hemodynamic instability. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018;44:487-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0983-y
  12. Matsumura Y, Matsumoto J, Kondo H, Idoguchi K, Funabiki T; DI-RECT-IABO investigators. Partial occlusion, conversion from thoracotomy, undelayed but shorter occlusion: resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta strategy in Japan. Eur J Emerg Med 2018;25:348-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000466
  13. Matsushima K, Conti B, Chauhan R, Inaba K, Dutton RP. Novel methods for hemorrhage control: resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and emergency preservation and resuscitation. Anesthesiol Clin 2019;37:171-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2018.09.003
  14. Morrison JJ, Ross JD, Houston R 4th, Watson JD, Sokol KK, Rasmussen TE. Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a highly lethal model of noncompressible torso hemorrhage. Shock 2014;41:130-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000085
  15. Chang SW, Chang YR, Seon YJ, Park JW, Kim JS. Intraoperative use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control in woman with placenta percreta involving the bladder. Perinatology 2019;30:175-8. https://doi.org/10.14734/PN.2019. 30.3.175
  16. Hoareau GL, Tibbits EM, Beyer CA, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: review of the literature and applications to veterinary emergency and critical care. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00197
  17. Cho S, Ryu JW, Chang SW. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for retroperitoneal hemorrhage and shock after ipsilateral antegrade angioplasty with vascular closure device. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:404. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.47
  18. Chang SW, Kim DH, Chang YR. Educational simulation videos for performing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. J Trauma Inj 2020;33:140-3. https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2020.0035
  19. Chang YR, Park CY, Kim DH, Ma DS, Chang SW. A course on endovascular training for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: a pilot study for residents and specialists. Ann Surg Treat Res 2020;99:362-9. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.6.362
  20. Chang SW, Ma DS, Chang YR, Kim DH. Practical tips for performing resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2021;28:165-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024907921994422
  21. Otsuka H, Sato T, Sakurai K, et al. Effect of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in hemodynamically unstable patients with multiple severe torso trauma: a retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg 2018;13:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0210-5
  22. Kim S, Chung JS, Jang SW, Jung PY. Pitfalls, complications, and necessity of education about REBOA: a single regional trauma center study. J Trauma Inj 2020;33:153-61. https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2020.0049
  23. Zakaluzny SA, Beldowicz BC, Salcedo ES, DuBose JJ, Moore LJ, Brenner M. Guidelines for a system-wide multidisciplinary approach to institutional resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta implementation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019;86:337-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002138
  24. Seamon MJ, Haut ER, Van Arendonk K, et al. An evidence-based approach to patient selection for emergency department thoracotomy: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;79:159-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000648
  25. Bulger EM, Perina DG, Qasim Z, et al. Clinical use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in civilian trauma systems in the USA, 2019: a joint statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians and the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2019;4:e000376. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2019-000376
  26. Beyer CA, Johnson MA, Galante JM, DuBose JJ. Zones matter: hemodynamic effects of zone 1 vs zone 3 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta placement in trauma patients. Injury 2019;50:855-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.013