Korean Public Administration Review (한국행정학보)

The Korean Association for Public Administration (한국행정학회)
권호 표지

Conceptualizing Governance: Governance as Social Coordination

거버넌스의 개념화 : '사회적 조정'으로서의 거버넌스

Lee, Myeong-Suk
이명석

  • Published : 20020000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The term 'governance' is widespread in characterizing both global and local arrangements, especially reformed ones. Because of its strong intuitive appeal, precise definitions are seldom thought to be necessary. As a result, when we identify governance as an important factor to achieve policy or organizational objectives, it may be unclear whether the reference is to organizational structures, administrative processes, systems of incentives and rules, or administrative philosophies. Due to this ambiguity, most of administrative reforms driven by the logic of governance are likely to be more superficial than substantive. This article attempts to; (ⅰ) review various definitions of governance; (ⅱ) discuss the logic of governance; and (ⅲ) clarify the definition of governance, and the New Governance. The conclusions of this article are: (ⅰ) governance can be defined as an 'institution of social coordination'; (ⅱ) the New Governance is an 'institution of social coordination based on the logic of co-steering and network'; (ⅲ) the New Governance should be, and can be differentiated from various forms of new governance.

거버넌스란 개념이 최근 매우 광범위한 분야에서 사용되고 있다. 그러나 아직 이 매력적인 개념의 정의에 대한 학문적 합의가 존재하지 않는다. 이러한 개념상의 모호성으로, 개혁의 논리로 거버넌스가 강조되는 경우 거버넌스가 의미하는 것이 조직 구조인지, 행정절차인지, 관리기법인지, 정책기조인지 불분명한 경우가 많다. 개념상의 혼란은 특히 행정개혁과정에서 많은 문제점을 야기할 수 있다. 모호하면서도 그럴듯해 보이는 거버넌스라는 개념은 자칫하면 실질적인 행정개혁보다는 수사적인 목적을 위해 사용될 가능성이 있기 때문이다. 본 연구는 거버넌스를 ‘공통의 문제 해결을 위한 사회적 조정 방법’, 그리고 신거버넌스를 네트워크를 강조하는 ‘특수한 형태의 사회적 조정방법’으로 정의한다. 특히, 본 연구는 다양한 유형의 ‘새로운 거버넌스’와 차별화되는 ‘소수에 의한 결정이나 보이지 않는 손에 의한 결정보다, 대화, 협상, 조정을 통한 타협이나 동의에 더 큰 가치를 두는’ 신거버넌스 논리의 중요성을 강조한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강 민 . 김욱경 .(2000).한국에서의 금융위기관리 거버넌스의 딜레마."한국정치학보",34(3):83-102
  2. 강창현.(2002).지역복지 공급 네트워크 연구: 네트워크 접근. "한국행정학보", 36(2): 313-32
  3. 김광웅.(2000).협력체제(Paitnctship)와 효과적인 국정운영 . 박재창 편. "정부와 NGO", 20-47.서울: 법문사
  4. 김 균. (2000). 하이에크와 신자유주의. 안병영 . 임혁백 편. "세계화와 신자유주의 - 이념 . 현실 . 대응',85-103.서울:나남출판
  5. 김근세.(2000). 국정관리체계의 갈등: 정부조직 관리개혁을 중심으로. "국정관리의 새로운 방형과 과제(한국행정학회 하계학술대회).서울
  6. 김석준.(2000).한국 국가재창조와 뉴 가버넌스: 새로운 패러다임의 모색. "한국행정학보", 34(2): 1-21
  7. 김석준 외 .(2000). "뉴 거버넌스 연구". 서울: 대영문화사
  8. 김정렬.(2000).정부의 미래와 거버넌스: 신공공관리와 정책네트워크."한국행정학보", 34(1): 21-39
  9. 김정렬.(2001).영국 블레어 정부의 거버넌스. "한국행정학보", 35(3):85-102
  10. 문순흥 . 정규호. (2000). 거버넌스와 젠더: 젠더친화적 거버넌스의 조건에 대한 탐구. "Post-IMF Governance(한국정치학회하계학술대회)".서울
  11. 박영주. (2000). 뉴거버넌스와 사회계약: 시민, 정부, 시장간의 역할과 책임의 모색. "한국행정학보", 34(4):19-39
  12. 박재욱 . 류현옥.(2000). 로컬 거버넌스와 시장의 리더쉽. "국정관리의 새로운 방형과 과제(한국행정학회 하계학술대회).서울
  13. 배응환. (2002).지방정부와 지방환경 NGO관계: 개발논리에 대한 환경보존논리의 대응을 중심으로. "한국행정학보", 36(1): 253-74
  14. 서울시정개발연구원.(2001). "서울시정의 로컬 거버넌스도입전략". 정책토론회,2001.11.28.서울
  15. 유재원.(2000).세계화, 신자유주의 그리고 지방자치 . "한국행정학보", 34(4): 155-174
  16. 이명석.(1999). 합리적 선택론의 신제도주의. 정웅덕 외 편. "합리적 선택과 신제도주의", 9-30.서울:대영문화사
  17. 이명석.(2001a).신자유주의, 신공공관리론,그리고 행정개혁. "사회과학",40(1):1-45
  18. 이명석.(2001b).Jens Blom-Hansen의 신제도주의적 정책망 분석. "정책학의 주요이론", 118-126, 서울:법문사
  19. 전대성. (1997). 지방행정의 새로운 접근방법 : 통치양식 이론을 중심으로. "한국행정학회 동계학술대회발표논문"
  20. 정무권.(2001).정부와 NGO의 관계:개념화의 문제와 이론적 쟁점. "사회과학논평",21:93-139
  21. 정용덕 외 역.(1998). "미래의 국정관리". 서울:법문사
  22. 정정길.(2000). "행정학의 새로운 이해". 대명출판사
  23. 하연섭,(1999).역사적 제도주의 . 정용덕 외 편. "신제도주의 연구", 9-36.서울:대영문화사
  24. 허철행.(2000).김대중정부 신자유주의 정부혁신의 비판적 검토. "행정개혁 2년:성과와 반성(2000년도한국행정학회춘계학술대회),1-26
  25. Amin, A. & J. Hausner. (1997). Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity. Lyme. U.S.A: Edward Elgar
  26. Andrew, C. & M. Goldsmith. (1998). From Local Government to Local Governance - and Beyond? International Political Science Review. 19(2): 101-117 https://doi.org/10.1177/019251298019002002
  27. Aucoin, P. & R. Heinnzman. (2000). The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform. in G. Peters and D. Savoie(eds.), Governance in the Twenty-first Century: Revitalizing the Public Service, 244-280. London: McGill-Queen's University Press
  28. Beetham, D. (1996). Bureaucracy. 2nd edition. Buckingham: Open University Press
  29. Campbell, J., R. Hollingsworth, & L. Lindberg. (1991). Governance of the American Economy. Cambridge University Press
  30. Cohn, D. (1997). Creating Crises and Avoiding Blame: The Politics of Public Service Reform and the New Public Management in Great Britain and the United States. Administration and Society. 29(5): 584-616 https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979702900504
  31. Considine, M. & J. Lewis. (1999). Governance at Ground Level: The Frontline Bureaucrat in the Age of Markets and Networks. PAR. 59(6):467-460
  32. Ellwood, J. (2000). Prospect for the Study of the Governance of public Organizations and Policies, in C. Heinrich and L. Lynn, Jr.(eds.), Governance and Performance: New Perspectives, Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press
  33. Elster, J. (1998). Deliverative Democracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
  34. Hall, P. & R. Taylor. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. XLIV: 936-957
  35. Harmon, M. & R. Mayer. (1986). Organizational Theory for Public Administration. Glenview: Scott, Foresman
  36. Heinrich, C. & L. Lynn, Jr. (eds). (2000). Governance and Performance: New Perspectives, Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press
  37. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Season?. Public Administration. 69(Spring):3-19 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  38. Ingraham, P. & K. Donahue. (2000). Dissecting the Black Box Revisited: Characterizing Government Management Capacity. in C. Heinrich and L. Lynn, Jr.(eds.), Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press
  39. Jennings, Jr., E. & J. Ewalt. (2000). Driving Caseloads Down: Welfare Policy Choice and Administrative Action in the States. E. in C. Heinrich and L. Lynn, Jr.(eds.), Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press
  40. Jessop, B. (1997). The Govemance of Complexity and the Complexity of Govemance: Preliminary Remarks on Some Problems and Limits of Economic Guidance. in Ash Amin and Jerzy Hausner. (1997). Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, 95-128. Lyme, U.S.: Edward Elgar
  41. Jessop, B. (2000). Govemance Failure in G. Stoker(ed.), The New Politics of British Local Governance, 11-32. St. Martin Press
  42. John, D., D. Kettle, B. Dyer & W. Lovan. (1994). What Will New Governance Mean for the Federal Government? Public Administration Review. 54(2): 170-175 https://doi.org/10.2307/976526
  43. Kickert, W. (1997). Public Governance in the Netherlands: An Alternative to Anglo-American 'Managerialism'. Public Administration. 75: 731-752 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00084
  44. Kiely, R. (1998). Neoliberalism Revised? A Critical Account of World Bank Conception of Good Governance and Market Friendly Intervention, International Journal of Health Services. 28(4): 683-702 https://doi.org/10.2190/RPMG-JYB5-8DN6-AC30
  45. Kooiman, J.(1993). Societal-Political Governance: Introduction, in J. Kooiman. ed. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage
  46. Kooiman, J. (2000). Societal Governance: Levels, Modes, and Orders of Social-Political Interaction, in Pierre, J.(ed.), Debating Governance. Oxford University Press
  47. Lappe, M. & P. M. Du Bois. (1994). The Quickening of America: Rebuilding Our Nation, Remaking Our Lives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  48. Lynn, Jr., L., C. Heinrich & C. Hill. (2001). Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington. D.C.: Georgetown University Press
  49. Newman, J. (2001). Modernising Governance: New labour, Policy And Society. London: Sage
  50. Osborne, D. & T. Gaebler. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume
  51. Ostrom, E. (1986). An Agenda for the Study of Institutions, Public Choice. 48(1): 3-25
  52. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  53. Ostrom, V. (1989) Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press
  54. Peters, G. (1996), The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas
  55. Peters, G. (2000). Globahzation, Institutions, Governance. in G. Peters and D. Savoie(eds.), Governance in the Twenty-first Century: Revitalizing the Public Service, 29-57. London: McGill-Queen's University Press
  56. Pierre, J. (1999). Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics. Urban Affairs Review. 34(3): 372-396 https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
  57. Pierre, J. (2000). Debating Governance. Oxford University Press
  58. Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexity and Accountability. Bristrol, PA: Open University Press
  59. Rhodes, R. (2000). The Governance Narrative: Key Findings and Lessons from the ESRC s Whitehall Programme. Public Administration. 78(2): 345-363 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00209
  60. Roderick, M., B. Jacob, & A. Bryk. (2000). Evaluating Chicago's Efforts to End Social Promotion. in C. Heinrich and L. Lynn, Jr.(eds.), Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press
  61. Rosenau, J. (1992). Governance, Order, and Changes in World Politics. in Rosenau, J. and E. Czempiel. (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, 1-29. Cambridge University Press
  62. Saint-Martin, D. (1998). Management Consultants, the State, and the Politics of Administrative Reform in Britain and Canada. Administration and Society. 30(5): 533-569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399798305003
  63. Stoker,G. (1998). Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal. 50(1): 17-28 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106
  64. Stoker,G. (2000a). The New Politics of British Local Governance. St. Martin Press
  65. Stoker,G. (2000b). Urban Political Science and the Challenge of Urban Governance. in J. Pierre. Debating Governance. Oxford University Press
  66. Williams, D. (2001). Macro-Policy and Cumulative Effects: Elements Necessary to Move from Government to Governance. paper presented at 14th annual PAT-Net Conference. Changing Discourses: Democracy, Institutions and Civil Space. Leiden University, The Netherlands, June 21-23
  67. World Bank. (1992). Goverance and Development. World Bank, Washington
  68. Wright, V. (2000). Blurring the Public-Private Divide. in G. Peters and D. Savoie(eds.), Governance in the Twenty-first Century: Revitalizing the Public Service, 155-177. London: McGill-Queen's University Press
  69. www.iog.ca/about.html