DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of 115K Tanker Design Adopted Ice Class 1A

Baltic Ice Class IA를 적용한 115K Ice Tanker 개발

  • Kim, Hyun-Soo (Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Marine Research Institute) ;
  • Ha, Mun-Keun (Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Marine Research Institute) ;
  • Baek, Myeong-Chul (Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Marine Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Soo-Young (Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Marine Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Jong-Woo (Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., Marine Research Institute) ;
  • Chun, Ho-Hwan (Pusan National University)
  • 김현수 (삼성중공업 조선해양연구소) ;
  • 하문근 (삼성중공업 조선해양연구소) ;
  • 백명철 (삼성중공업 조선해양연구소) ;
  • 김수형 (삼성중공업 조선해양연구소) ;
  • 박종우 (삼성중공업 조선해양연구소) ;
  • 전호환 (부산대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

There are very few numbers of 115K FPP (Fixed Pitch Propulsion) Tankers for the Baltic ice class IA because the minimum power requirement of FMA (Finish- Swedish Maritime Association) needs quite large engine power and the 40 m Beam is out of calculation range of FMA minimum power requirements. The shipyard has no choice except to increase the engine power to satisfy FMA minimum power requirement Rule. And the operation cost, efficiency of hullform and its building cost are not good from the ship owners' point of view To solve this problem, the experience of ice breaking tanker development and the ice tank test results were adopted. The main idea to reduce the ice resistance is by reducing waterline angle at design load waterline. The reason behind the main idea is to reduce the ice-clearing force. Two hull forms were developed to satisfy Baltic Ice class IA. Two ice tank tests and one towing tank test was performed at MARC (Kvaener-Masa Arctic Research Center) and SSMB (Samsung Ship Model Basin) facilities, respectively. The purpose of these tests was to verify the performance in ice and open water respectively The hull form 2 shows less speed loss compared to Hull form 1 in open water operation but hull form 2 shows very good ice clearing ability. finally the Hull Form 2 satisfying Baltic ice class IA. The merit of this hull form is to use the same engine capacity and no major design changes in hull form and other related designs But the hull structure has to be changed according to the ice class grade. The difference in two hull form development methods, ice model test methods and analysis methods of ice model test will be described in this paper.

Keywords

References

  1. 김현수 등, 2003, ' 극지용 쇄빙 유조선 개발,' 대한조선학회 논문집, 제 40 권, 제 6 호, pp. 20-29
  2. Anita Nortala-Hoikkanen, 1990, ' FGX Model Ice at the Masa-Yards Arctic Research Center,' IAHR Ice Symposium
  3. MARC, 2002, Standard Ship Model Tests, Ice Conditions and Analysis Methods at MasaYards Arctic Research Center, MARC Reports D-114