Psychosocial Distress and Its Related Factors among Clerical Public Officers

사무직 공무원의 스트레스 수준 및 관련요인

Cho, Kwang-Hee;Lee, Dong-Bae;Cho, Young-Chae
조광희;이동배;조영채

  • Published : 20070300

Abstract

Objectives: This study was performed to determine the levels of psychosocial distress among clerical public officers to reveal the various related factors. Methods: A self-administered questionnaires was administered between Dec. 5th, 2005 and Jan. 31st, 2006, to 1,005 individuals in the service of general administration located in Daejeon City. The survey items included the subjects’socio-demographic and job-related characteristics, health-related behavior, degree of job demand, job autonomy, social support in work, type A behavior pattern, locus of control, sense of self-esteem, and psychosocial distress. Results: The results showed that 24.8% of subjects were categorized as high risk stress, 64.9% as latent stress, and 10.3% as normal. The level of psychosocial distress was influenced by various sociodemographic characteristics, such as personality traits (type A behavior pattern, locus of control, selfesteem) and whether performing health-related behavior or not, as well as according to job-related characteristics such as rank in work, job career, job specifications, job demand, job autonomy, social support in work. Conclusions: The effective strategy for stress reduction among governmental employees requires additional programs focusing on innovated job specifications and managed personality traits.

목적: 사무직 공무원들의 사회심리적 스트레스 수준을 파악하며, 이에 관여하는 제 특성을 알아보고자 시도하였다. 방법: 대전광역시에 소재하고 있는 정부 공공기관의 사무직 공무원 1,005명을 대상으로 구조화된 무기명 자기기입식 설문지(self-administered questionnaire)를 이용한 설문조사를 실시하였다. 조사는 2005년 12월 5일부터 2006년 1월 31일까지의 기간 동안에 실시하였으며, 연구에 사용한 설문지의 구성은 조사대상자의 인구사회학적 및 직업관련 특성, 건강관련행위, 업무요구도, 업무자율성, 직장의 사회적지지, A형 행동유형, 통제신념, 자기존중감, 사회 심리적 스트레스수준 등으로 구성하였다. 분석은 사회심리적 스트레스 수준을 종속변수로, 기타 제변수를 독립변수로 하여 단변량분석 및 다중선형회귀분석을 실시하였다. 결과: 전체 연구대상자의 사회심리적 스트레스 수준은 건강군이 10.3%, 위험수준은 아니지만 스트레스로부터 위협을 받을 수 있는 잠재적 스트레스군이 64.9%, 심각한 수준의 스트레스를 받고 있는 고위험스트레스군이 24.8%로 나타났다. 또한 스트레스는 인구사회학적 특성이나 직급, 근무경력 등의 직업관련 특성뿐만 아니라 건강관련행위의 실천 여부, 직무요구도, 직무자율성, 직장내에서의 사회적 지지와 같은 직무내용 및 인성(A형 행동유형, 통제신념)이나 자기 존중감 등에 의해서도 많은 영향을 받고 있었다. 결론: 따라서 공무원들의 스트레스를 감소시키기기 위해서는 직무내용의 개선 및 인성관리를 위한 프로그램의 개발 및 시행이 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aneshensel CS. Social stress: theory and research. Ann Rev Sociol 1992;18:15-38 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000311
  2. Bourbonnais R, Brisson C, Moisan J, Vezina M, Job strain and psychological distress in white-collar workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1996;22:239-45
  3. Cha BS, Koh SB, Chang SJ. The association between job characteristics, psychosocial distress and homocysteine. Korean J Prev Med 1998;31:719-27. (Korean)
  4. Cha BS, Koh SB, Chang SJ, Park JK, Koh SY. Effect of noise exposure and psychosocial factors on blood pressure in manufacturing workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1997;9(2):244-57. (Korean)
  5. Chang SJ. Cha BS, Koh SB, Kang MG, Koh SY, Park JK. Association between Job characteristics and psychosocial distress of industral workers. Korean J Prev Med 1997;30:129-43. (Korean)
  6. Chang SJ. Standardization of Collection and Measurement of Health Statistics Data. The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine. Seoul. 2000. pp 92-143. (Korean)
  7. Chang SJ. A Study on the Distribution and Risk Factors for Psychosocial Distress, and the Development Worksite Stress Reduction Program. Ministry of Health & Welfare 2001
  8. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang MG, Cha BS, Park JK, Hyun SJ, Park JH, Kim SA, Kang DM, Chang SS, Lee KJ, Ha EH, Woo JM, Cho JJ, Kim HS, Park JS. Epidemiology of psychosocial distress in Korean employees. J Prev Med Public Health 2005;38(1):25-37. (Korean)
  9. Conway TL, Ward HW, Vickers RR, Rahe RH. Occupational stress and variation in cigarette, coffee, and alcohol consumption. J Health Soc Behav 1981;22:155-65 https://doi.org/10.2307/2136291
  10. Cooper H, Okamura L, McNeil P. Situation and personality correlates of psychological well-being: social activity and personal control. J Res Personality 1995;29:395-417 https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1995.1023
  11. Ferrie JE, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG, Stanfeld S, Smith GD. Health effects of anticipation of job change and non-employment; longitudinal data from the Whitehall II study. BMJ 1995; 311(7015):1264-69 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1264
  12. Goldberg DP. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, England: NFER Publishy. 1978
  13. Haynes SG, Levine S. Scotch N, Feinleib M, Kannel W. The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. Am J Epidemiol 1978;107:362-83 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112556
  14. Kang JW, Hong YS, Lee HJ, Yeah BJ, Kim JI, Kim JM, Jung KY, Kim JY. Factors affecting fatigue and stress in male manufacturing workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2005;17(2):129-37. (Korean)
  15. Karasek R, Theorell T, Schwartz JE, Schnall PL, Pieper CF, Michela JL. Job characteristics in relation to the prevalence of myocardial infarction in the US Health Examination Survey (HES) and the Health and Nutrition Survey (HANES). Am J Public Health 1988;78:910-8 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.8.910
  16. Kiecolt, KJ, Stress and the decision to change oneself: a theoretical model. Soc Psychol Q 1994;57:49-63 https://doi.org/10.2307/2786974
  17. Kim SH, Yun GS. A study on the stress and fatigue of research workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1998;10(1):105-15. (Korean)
  18. Kirkcaldy BD, Cooper CL, Furnham A, Brown JL. Personality, job satisfaction and well-being among public sector (police)managers. Special Issue: The validity and utility of personality assessment in occupational psychology. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 1993;43:241-8
  19. Kivimaki M, Vahtera J, Pentti J, Ferrie JE. Factors underlying the effects of organizational downsizing on health of employees: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ 2000; 320(7240):971-5 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7240.971
  20. Kobasa SC, Maddi SR, Kahn S. Hardiness and health: a prospective study. J Pers Soc Psychol 1982;42:168-77 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.168
  21. Koh SB. Son MA, Kong JO, Lee CG, Chang SJ, Cha BS, Job characteristics and psycho-social distress of atypical workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2004;16:103-13. (Korean)
  22. Lester D, Tamacki PA. Frequencies of dreams and daydreams and locus of control. Percept Motor Skills 1989;69:954 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1989.69.3.954
  23. Levenson H. Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. J Cons Clin Psychol 1973;41:397-404 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035357
  24. Lin L, Ensel WM. Life Stress and health: stressors and resources. Am Sociol Rev 1989;54:382-99 https://doi.org/10.2307/2095612
  25. NIOSH. Working Group. Stress at Work. NIOSH, 1999
  26. Oh JK. Structural modeling of stress, life style and health status in industrial employees. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2000;12(1):26-40. (Korean)
  27. Perlow R, Latham LL. Relationship of client abuse with locus of control and gender: a longitudinal study in mental retardation facilities. J Appl Psychol 1993;78:831-4 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.831
  28. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965
  29. Rotter J. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Pentice-Hall, 1975
  30. Schoenbach VJ, Kaplan BH, Fredman L, Kleinbaum DG. Social ties and mortality in Evans county, Georgia. Am J Epidemiol 1986;123:577-91 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114278
  31. Schafer RB, Keith PM. Change in adult self-esteem: a longitudinal assessment. Br J Soc Psychol 1999;38:303-14 https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164185
  32. Sidrow NE, Lester D. Locus of control and suicidal ideation. Percept Motor Skills 1988;67:576 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.67.2.576
  33. Taylor SE, Brown GW. Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull 1988;103:193-210 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
  34. Vahtera J, Kivimaki M, Pentti J. Effect of organizational downsizing on health of employees. Lancet 1997;350(9085):1124-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03216-9