Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지

An Integrated Assessment of Urban for Sustainable Development

지속가능한 발전을 위한 통합적인 도시 평가

  • Lee, Woo-Sung (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jung, Sung-Gwan (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Kyung-Hun (Dept. of Environment Engineering, Changwon National University) ;
  • You, Ju-Han (Institute of Industrial Technology, Changwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Tae (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2007.09.21
  • Accepted : 2007.12.05
  • Published : 2007.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the sustainability in 45 cities of all over Gyeongnam and Gyeongbuk using weights and assessment system developed in leading research. The materials of assessment used statistical data and spatial data were standardized for the systematic result. The assessment score was established using the normal distribution from 25 to 125 for removal of the very smallest and maximum value. According to the results, Tongyeong was assessed the highest by 82.5 score in environmental sustainability index. In economical sustainability index, Pohang, Gumi, Changwon, Yangsan were more than 79 score but Busan, Daegu, Andong were less than 70 score. Ulsan, Geoje, Yangsan were assessed higher in society-institutional sustainability index and Jinju, Munkyeong, Changnyeong were showed higher than other cities by more 79 score in quality of life(QOL)'s sustainability index. In case of integrated sustainability index, Jinju that was the highest sustainability in QOL was assessed by first city. However, Ulsan was assessed the lowest city among others. Therefore cities which have high sustainability will prepare a politic investment program for maintaining current conditions. Cities which have low sustainability will grasp closely the environmental characteristics of urban and present the improvement direction through monitoring continuously. Overall, these results can be used as tools to assess the current cities and predict the future one. It is also necessary to establish a systematic urban planning for livable and sustainable city.

Keywords

References

  1. 고석찬,김인환,홍승훈. 2002, 우리나라 지방과학 기술 여건파 지역성장의 상관성 분석,지역사회발전연구,27, 227-245
  2. 김경태,2005, Ecologica Footprint 를 활용한 도시환경용량평가, 경북대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  3. 김귀곤,김훈희,1997, 도시지속성지표 개발과 적용에 관한 연구,국토계획,32(3), 175--195
  4. 박용규,2005, 지역경제의 활성화와 신산업의 창출,지방행정,54, 26-37
  5. 박재홍,1993, 수도권의 인구이동의 산업구조 변화에 관한 연구,국토계획,28(2), 203-219
  6. 박현옥,이한나,2006,삶의 질 향상을 위한 일상생활환경의 만족도에 관한 연구-충남 홍성군을 중심으로,한국생활과학회지,15(1), 83-93
  7. 안문석,문태훈,홍성걸,1999, 도시별 지속가능성의 측정과 도시간 지속가능성 비교연구,한국행정학보, 33(1) 151-168
  8. 유재현,1996, 에너지관리. 에너지관리공단 권호정보, 246, 54-56
  9. 이동근,윤소원,1998, 지속가능한 도시개발을 위한 환경지표에 관한 연구,환경영향평가,7(1), 93-107
  10. 이우성,정성관,박경훈,우주한,2006,낙동강중류의 토지피복형태를 고려한 유역별 수질오염도분석,한국환경과학회지,15(4), 349-357 https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2006.15.4.349
  11. 이우성,정성관,유주한,김경태,2007, 도시 지속성 평가를 위한 통합지표의 가중치 결정,국토계획,42(3), 7-22
  12. 이종철,이은복,2004, 중국 도시부문의 정보통신 격차와 소득불평등,동북아경제연구,16(3), 113-137
  13. 정회성,김경아,함수예,남영숙,이송호,1993, 환경적합성 평가기법의 개선과 활용방안 연구, 한국환경정책평가연구원 연구보고서
  14. 정회성,전대욱,정영근, 2005, 지방단위 지속가능 발전지표 연구. 한국환경정책평가연구원 연구보고서
  15. 조현숙,2002,지속가능발전지표(DSI)를 적용한 도시환경의 평가-서울시 25개구를 대상으로,한양대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  16. 최태룡,2000,진주시 삶의 질 연구: 200년 조사,경남문화연구,22, 139-171
  17. 홍영록,권상준,명현,1999, 지방도시의 지속가능성 평가모형,한국조경학회지,27(4), 1-12
  18. 환경계획연구소,1992, 개발사업의 환경기여도 평가제도 도입에 관한 연구,환경계획연구소
  19. Clean Water Service, 2002, Effect Impervious Area Reduction Task Force Report
  20. CWP, 2003, Impact of Impervious Cover on Aquatic System, Watershed Protection Research Monograph No.1
  21. Jones, K. B., A. C., Neale, M. S. Nash, R. C. Van Rernortel, J. D. Wickham, K. H. Ritters, and R. V. O'Neill, 2001, Predicting nutrient and sediment loading to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region, Landscape Ecology, 16, 301-312 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011175013278
  22. Mayers, D., 1987, Community-relevant measurement of quality of life: a focus on local trends, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23
  23. Pavor, W. and E. Diener, 1993, Review of the satisfaction with life scale, Psycboiogical Assessment, 5
  24. Platt, R. H., R. A. Rowntree, and P.C. Muick, 1994, The Ecological City: Preserving and Restoreing Urban Biodiversity, MA:The University of Massachusetts Press
  25. Sneddon, C., R. B. Howarth, and R. B. Norgaard, 2006, Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world, Ecological Economics, 57, 253-268 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013
  26. WEF, 2001, 2001 Environmental Sustainability Idex
  27. WEF, 2002, 2002 Environmental Sustainahility Idex