Clinical outcomes and predictive factors of spontaneous survival in patients with fulminant hepatitis A

전격성 A형간염의 임상양상 및 자발생존에 관한 예측인자

Kim, Jwa-Min;Lee, Yoon-Seon;Lee, Jae-Ho;Kim, Won;Lim, Kyung-Soo
김좌민;이윤선;이재호;김원;임경수

  • Published : 20080000

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: The occurrence of acute hepatitis A is increasing and its progression to fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is frequent. We investigated the frequency and clinical outcomes of fulminant hepatitis A and also analyzed the predictive factors of spontaneous survival. Methods: A total of 568 patients presented with acute hepatitis A from January 2003 to June 2008, of which the 35 (6.2%) patients with FHF were divided into two groups: spontaneous survival and transplant/death. These two groups were compared according to various clinical features including the MELD score and King’s College Hospital (KCH) criteria. Results: The rate of FHF development increased over time among patients with acute hepatitis A: 0% in 2003, 3.4% in 2004, 3.2% in 2005, 6.0% in 2006, 7.7% in 2007, and 13.0% in 2008. Twenty patients (57.1%) showed spontaneous survival, 13 (37.1%) received liver transplantation, and 5 (14.3%) died during hospitalization. The two groups of spontaneous survival (N=20) and transplant/death (N=15) showed significant differences in prothrombin time at admission and at its worst value, albumin at its worst value, and hepatic encephalopathy grade at admission and at its worst value. The MELD score was lower in the spontaneous-survival group than in the transplant/death group (27.0±7.8 vs. 37.0±7.1, mean±SD; P=0.001). However, KCH criteria did not differ significantly between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, HEP grade was the only significant predictive factor, being negatively correlated with spontaneous survival (OR=0.068, P=0.025). Conclusions: FHF due to hepatitis A has increased in recent years, and in our cohort the HEP grade was closely associated with spontaneous survival. (Korean J Hepatol 2008;14:474-482)

목적: 급성 A형간염은 과거에는 주로 소아기에 불현성 감염으로 지나가는 경우가 대부분이었으며 현성 감염이라 하더라도 치명적인 합병증이 없이 거의 모든 환자에서 완전 회복을 보여 왔다. 그러나 최근 급성 A형간염이 급증하면서 간성뇌증을 동반한 전격성 간부전으로의 진행이 점점 증가하고 있다. 전격성 간부전은 적극적인 내과적 치료에도 불구하고 높은 사망률을 보이며 간이식술만이 생존을 기대할 수 있는 유일한 치료이다. 따라서 저자들은 우리나라에서 최근 변화하는 급성 A형간염의 임상경과에 대해 알아보고, 전격성 간부전 환자들에서 자발생존을 예측할 수 있는 인자를 규명하고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 2003년 1월부터 2008년 6월까지 울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 응급실에 내원한 급성 A형간염 환자 568명 중 전격성 간부전 35예를 자발생존군과 간이식/사망군으로 나누어 성별, 연령, 간성뇌증 발생까지의 시간, 내원 시와 임상적으로 가장 악화 시의 혈액검사 소견과 간성뇌증의 중증도 등을 후향적으로 비교 분석하였다. 또한 MELD 점수와 KCH 기준에 대해 두 군 간의 차이를 분석하였다. 결과: 568명의 급성 A형간염 환자 중 35명(6.2%)에서 전격성 간부전이 발생하였으며, 빈도는 최근 들어 급증하였다. 전격성 간부전 환자 35명 중 20명(57.1%)이 자발생존을 보였고, 13명(37.1%)이 간이식술을 시행받았으며, 5명(14.3%)이 사망하였다. 전격성 간부전 환자의 평균 나이는 31.4세였고, 남자가 23명이었다. 자발생존군(n=20명)과 간이식/사망군(n=15명)의 단변량 분석에서 내원 시 프로트롬빈 시간(INR)(2.1±0.8 vs. 3.4±1.8; P=0.012), 가장 악화된 시점의 프로트롬빈 시간(INR)(2.2±0.8 vs. 3.7±1.6; P=0.001), 가장 악화된 시점의 혈청 알부민 수치(2.6±0.4 vs. 2.2±0.5 g/dL; P=0.023), 내원 시와 가장 악화된 시점의 간성뇌증의 중증도(P<0.001)가 두 군 간에 의미 있는 차이를 보였다. MELD 점수는 자발생존군이 간이식/사망군에 비해 유의하게 낮았다(27.0±7.8 vs. 37.0±7.1; P=0.001). 그러나 KCH 기준해당은 두 군 간에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 다변량 분석에서는 간성뇌증의 중증도가 유일하게 예후와 독립적 연관이 있었다(OR=0.068; P=0.025). 결론: HAV 감염으로 인한 전격성 간부전으로의 진행이 증가하고 있고, 전격성 A형간염의 경우 간성뇌증의 중증도가 예후와 유의한 독립적 관련을 보였다. 따라서, 치명적 합병증의 높은 발생률과 사망률을 고려할 때, 급성 A형간염 발생 시 좀더 신중한 관찰이 필요하겠고, HAV에 대한 백신 접종이 권장되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Song MH, Lim YS, Song TJ, Choi JM, Kim JI, Jun JB, et al. The etiology of acute viral hepatitis for the last 3 years. Korean J Med 2005;68:256-260
  2. Willner IR, Uhl MD, Howard SC, Williams EQ, Riely CA, Waters B. Serious hepatitis A: an analysis of patients hospitalized during an urban epidemic in the United States. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:111-114 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-128-2-199801150-00006
  3. Song YB, Lee JH, Choi MS, Koh KC, Paik SW, Yoo BC, et al. The age-specific seroprevalence of hepatitis A virus antibody in Korea. Korean J Hepatol 2007;13:27-33
  4. Lemon SM, Shapiro CN. The value of immunization against hepatitis A. Infect Agents Dis 1994;3:38-49
  5. Koff RS. Hepatitis A. Lancet 1998;351:1643-1649 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01304-X
  6. Schiodt FV, Davern TJ, Shakil AO, McGuire B, Samuel G, Lee WM. Viral hepatitis-related acute liver failure. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:448-453 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.t01-1-07223.x
  7. Han SH, Lee SH, Roh BJ, Shim SC, Cho SC, Sohn JH, et al. An outbreak of hepatitis A in South Korea military personnel: A clinical and epidemiologic study. Korean J Hepatol 2001;7:392-400
  8. Kang HM, Jeong SH, Kim JW, Lee D, Choi CK, Park YS, et al. Recent etiology and clinical features of acute viral hepatitis in a single center of Korea. Korean J Hepatol 2007;13:495-502 https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2007.13.4.495
  9. Lee TH, Kim SM, Lee GS, Im EH, Huh KC, Choi YW, et al. Clinical features of acute hepatitis A in the western part of Daejeon and Chungnam province: single center experience. Korean J Gastroenterol 2006;47:136-143
  10. Heo NY, Lim YS, Kang JM, Oh SI, Park CS, Jung SW, et al. Clinical features of fulminant hepatic failure in a tertiary hospital with a liver transplant center in Korea. Korean J Hepatol 2006;12:82-92
  11. Shin SJ, Ahn SH, Kim HM, Kim JK, Kim BC, Lee JH, et al. Clinical features and prognostic factors of fulminant hepatic failure in Koreans. Korean J Hepatol 2004;10:298-307
  12. Taylor RM, Davern T, Munoz S, Han SH, McGuire B, Larson AM, et al. Fulminant hepatitis A virus infection in the United States: incidence, prognosis, and outcomes. Hepatology 2006;44:1589-1597 https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21439
  13. Rezende G, Roque-Afonso AM, Samuel D, Gigou M, Nicand E, Ferre V, et al. Viral and clinical factors associated with the fulminant course of hepatitis A infection. Hepatology 2003;38:613-618
  14. Yun H, Kim S, Lee H, Byun KS, Kwon SY, Yim HJ, et al. Genetic analysis of HAV strains isolated from patients with acute hepatitis in Korea, 2005-2006. J Med Virol 2008;80:777-784 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21127
  15. Anand AC, Nightingale P, Neuberger JM. Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure: an assessment of the King's criteria. J Hepatol 1997;26:62-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(97)80010-4
  16. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology 2000;31:864-871 https://doi.org/10.1053/he.2000.5852
  17. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001;33:464-470 https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2001.22172
  18. Kremers WK, van IJperen M, Kim WR, Freeman RB, Harper AM, Kamath PS, et al. MELD score as a predictor of pretransplant and posttransplant survival in OPTN/UNOS status 1 patients. Hepatology 2004;39:764-769 https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20083
  19. Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, Harper A, Kim R, Kamath P, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 2003;124:91-96 https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2003.50016
  20. Wasley A, Samandari T, Bell BP. Incidence of hepatitis A in the United States in the era of vaccination. JAMA 2005;294:194-201 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.2.194
  21. Fiore AE, Wasley A, Bell BP. Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2006;55:1-23
  22. Jeong SH. Current status and vaccine indication for hepatitis A virus infection in Korea. Korean J Gastroenterol 2008;51:331-337
  23. Victor JC, Monto AS, Surdina TY, Suleimenova SZ, Vaughan G, Nainan OV, et al. Hepatitis A vaccine versus immune globulin for postexposure prophylaxis. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1685-1694 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070546