Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Challenges and Recent Movements in Scholarly Communication Concerning Electronic Journal Licensing Consortia

전자저널 컨소시엄을 둘러싼 학술커뮤니케이션의 쟁점과 대응동향

  • Kim, Sung-Jin (Dept. of Library & Information Science, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Jung, Eun-Kyung (Department of Library and Information Science, Graduate School, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Han, Min-Hae (Department of Library and Information Science, Graduate School, Ewha Womans University)
  • 김성진 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학) ;
  • 정은경 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 한민혜 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2008.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Electronic information, especially e-journals took their position as core resources in current scholarly communication. However, the publishing and pricing structure of e-journal licensing process have not yet succeeded to be reorganized in accord with newly changed electronic scholarly communication environment. That resulted in a lot of challenges scholarly communication now faced. This study aimed to analyze key issues regarding big deal, pricing, licensing, archiving, copyright and public access by conducting comprehensive literature review and examining movements of world wide scholarly institutes and alliances. And then this study eventually purposed to draw some strategies which domestic libraries and consortia should take in order to lead current changes in scholarly communication.

전자저널은 학술커뮤니케이션의 핵심자원으로 자리매김하였다. 그러나 학술시장의 출판 및 가격책정구조가 새롭게 변화한 전자환경에 발맞추어 합리적으로 변모하지 못함으로 인해 전자저널 컨소시엄을 둘러싼 학술커뮤니케이션은 여러 문제점에 봉착하였다. 본 연구는 포괄적인 문헌연구 및 각국의 학술연구 기관 및 단체의 활동 분석을 통해 전자저널 구독 관련 주요 쟁점사항을 빅딜, 가격모형, 라이선스 계약, 아카이빙, 독점 및 저작권 측면에서 검토하였다. 나아가 이러한 이슈들에 대한 국제적인 대응동향을 표준 라이선스 개발, 이용통계의 표준화, 전자저널 아카이빙, 공공접근 활성화 측면에서 살펴보며 변화하는 학술커뮤니케이션 환경에서 국내 도서관 및 컨소시엄이 취해야 하는 전략들을 고찰해보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 신은자. 2001. 전자저널의 가격모형과 가격책정 현황에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(2): 151-170.
  2. 신은자. 2007. 학술지 빅딜판매의 문제점 및 개선 방안. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(1): 373-389.
  3. 오동근, 김숙찬. 2006. 대학도서관 전자저널이용자의 이용행태와 만족도에 관한 연구 -K대학교 도서관이용자를 중심으로-. 정보관리학회지, 23(4): 129-146. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.129
  4. 이소연 등. 2007. KESLI 효율성 분석을 통한 미래형 컨소시엄 운영모형 개발연구. [대전]: 한국과학기술정보연구원. 연구보고 K-07-IP-01-06P-7.
  5. 이소연. 2008. 새로운 학술커뮤니케이션 환경과 미래형 전자저널 컨소시엄 운영모형: KESLI를 중심으로. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 게재예정.
  6. 전혜영, 박수희. 2008. 전자저널 컨소시엄의 이해관계자 요구 분석 연구. 정보관리연구, 39(1): 게재예정.
  7. 한국교육학술정보원(KERIS). 2004. 2004 대학도서관 해외전자정보 구독 현황 및 수요조사 보고서. [서울]: 한국교육학술정보원. 연구보고 RR 2004-6.
  8. 황옥경. 2004. 전자저널 라이선스 계약모델에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(1):199-228.
  9. 황옥경. 2005. 디지털 시대의 도서관 라이선스. 서울: 한국학술정보(주).
  10. COUNTER. 2005a. Introduction to Release 2 of the COUNTER Code of Practice for Journals and Databases. .
  11. COUNTER. 2005b. The COUNTER Code of Practice - Journals and Databases: Release 2. .
  12. Davis, P. M. 2002. Patterns in electronic journal usage: challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries, 63(3): 484-497. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.63.6.484
  13. English, R. and P. Suber. 2006. Public access to federally funded research: the Cornyn-Lieberman and CURES bills. College & Research Libraries News, 67(6). .
  14. Estelle, L. 2005. Business Models for Journal Content: Final Report. [cited 2007.03.19]. .
  15. European Union/Directorate-General for Research(EU/DG-Research). 2006. Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe. Brussels: European Commission. .
  16. Fenton, E. G. 2006a. An overview of Portico: An Electronic Archiving Service. Serials Review, 32(2): 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2006.03.004
  17. Fenton, E. G. 2006b. Preserving Electronic Scholarly Journals: Portico. Ariadne, 47. .
  18. Gargiulo, P. 2003. Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy. The Serials, 16(3): 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1629/16293
  19. Hawbaker, A. C. and C. K. Wagner. 1996. Periodical Ownership versus Full-text Online Access: a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(2): 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90176-7
  20. Hockx-Yu, H. 2006a. Digital preservation in the context of institutional repositories. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 40(3): 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330610681312
  21. Hockx-Yu, H. 2006b. Establishing a UK LOCKSS Pilot Programme. Serials, 19(1): 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1629/1947
  22. ICOLC. 1998. Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Indexed, Abstracted, and Full Text Resources. .
  23. ICOLC. 2006. Revised Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Information Resources. .
  24. Kurata, K., M. Matsubayashi, S. Mine, T. Muranushi, and S. Ueda. 2007. Electronic journals and their unbundled functions in scholarly communication: Views and utilization by scientific, technological and medical researchers in Japan. Information Processing and Management, 43: 1402-1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.01.006
  25. Montgomery, C. H. 2000. Print to Electronic: Measuring the Operational and Economic Implications of an Electronic Journal Collection. Learned Publishing, 15: 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1087/09531510252848908
  26. Montgomery, C. H., and D. W. King. 2002. Comparing Library and User Related Costs of Print and Electronic Journal Collections: A First Step towards a Comprehensive Analysis. D-Lib Magazine, 8(10). .
  27. Nicholas, D., P. Huntington, H. R. Jamali and C. Tenopir. 2006a. What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals: case study OhioLINK. Journal of Documentation, 62(4): 482-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610673864
  28. Nicholas, D., P. Huntington, T. Dobrowolski, and I. Rowlands. 2006b. Ideas on creating a consumer market for scholarly journals” Learned Publishing, 19(4): 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315106778690698
  29. Ockerbloom, M. J. 2002. Report on a Mellon-Funded Planning Project for Archiving Scholarly Journals. University of Pennsylvania. .
  30. Oltmans, E. and A. Lemmen. 2006. The e-Depot at the National Library of the Netherlands. Serials, 19(1): 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1629/1961
  31. Research Information Network(RIN). 2006. UK Scholarly Journals: 2006 Baseline Report; an Evidence-based Analysis of Data Concerning Scholarly Journal Publishing. .
  32. Roth, A. C. 2000. Electronic Journal Pricing: Whats’ the Big Deal? Technical Services Reports, 17(3): 67-73.
  33. Schonfeld, R. C., D. W. King, A. Okerson, and E. Fenton. 2004. The Nonsubscription Side of Periodicals: Changes in Library Operations and Costs between Print and Electronic Formats. .
  34. Seadle, M. 2006. A Social Model for Archiving Digital Serials: LOCKSS. Serials Review, 32(2): 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2006.03.007
  35. World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). 2003. Building the Information Society: a Global Challenge in the New Millennium. .

Cited by

  1. Challenges and Solutions of Electronic Journal Consortium vol.41, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.4.093
  2. A Study for the Efficiency Analysis on Big Deals of Electronic Journal vol.47, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.187