Investigative and Clinical Urology

The Korean Urological Association (대한비뇨의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: What We Know and What We Don't Know

Lee, Hye-Young;Han, Sang-Won

  • Published : 20090500
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction is by far the most common cause of pediatric hydronephrosis. The widespread use of antenatal ultrasonography and modern imaging techniques has resulted in earlier and more common diagnosis of hydronephrosis. However, compared with this increased earlier detection, little has changed regarding the management of hydronephrosis. Through this review, we wish to provide an overview of the studies done to date and search for areas that warrant further study. Materials and Methods: Through PubMed, we reviewed the literature on the subject of UPJ obstruction in the pediatric population. We also present data from our institution regarding recent trends in the evaluation and treatment of UPJ obstructions. Results: In addition to conventional imaging studies, attempts are being made at making use of biochemical parameters (e.g., $\beta$2 m, N-acetyl-$\beta$- D-glucosaminidase [NAG], transforming growth factor [TGF]-$\beta$, etc.) as not only indicators of intervention but also prognostic factors during follow-up. Although we routinely use radionuclide imaging to evaluate renal function, a more accurate novel tool that can represent true renal function is needed. With the development in the field of laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery, the role of laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is expanding, even in the pediatric population. However, relatively little is known about the factors that might be associated with postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Not missing the optimal time for surgical intervention is as important as avoiding unnecessary surgery. Continuous development and refining of surgical skills for UPJ obstruction repair are requisites for (pediatric) urologists as is in-depth basic research of the disease.

Keywords

References

  1. Capello SA, Kogan BA, Giorgi LJ Jr, Kaufman RP Jr. Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2005;174:1425-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173130.86238.39
  2. Wiener JS, Emmert GK, Mesrobian HG, Whitehurst AW, Smith LR, King LR. Are modern imaging techniques over diagnosing ureteropelvic junction obstruction? J Urol 1995;154:659-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67127-1
  3. Carr MC, El-Ghoneimi A. Anomalies and surgery of the ureteropelvic junction in children. In: Campbell MF, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007;3359
  4. Ruano-Gil D, Coca-Payeras A, Tejedo-Mateu A. Obstruction and normal recanalization of the ureter in the human embryo. Its relation to congenital ureteric obstruction. Eur Urol 1975;1:287-93
  5. Dressler GR, Wilkinson JE, Rothenpieler UW, Patterson LT, Williams-Simons L, Westphal H. Deregulation of Pax-2 expression in transgenic mice generates severe kidney abnormalities. Nature 1993;362:65-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/362065a0
  6. Furness PD 3rd, Maizels M, Han SW, Cohn RA, Cheng EY. Elevated bladder urine concentration of transforming growth factor-beta1 correlates with upper urinary tract obstruction in children. J Urol 1999;162:1033-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68056-X
  7. Maizels M, Stephens FD. Valves of the ureter as a cause of primary obstruction of the ureter: anatomic, embryologic and clinical aspects. J Urol 1980;123:742-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56113-3
  8. Murnaghan GF. The dynamics of the renal pelvis and ureter with reference to congenital hydronephrosis. Br J Urol 1958;30:321-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1958.tb03525.x
  9. Hosgor M, Karaca I, Ulukus C, Ozer E, Ozkara E, Sam B, et al. Structural changes of smooth muscle in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1632-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.06.025
  10. Solari V, Piotrowska AP, Puri P. Altered expression of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003;170:2420-2 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000097401.03293.f0
  11. Stephens FD. Ureterovascular hydronephrosis and the 'aberrant' renal vessels. J Urol 1982;128:984-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)53308-X
  12. Sampaio FJ. Vascular anatomy at the ureteropelvic junction. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:251-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70012-4
  13. Ross JH, Kay R, Knipper NS, Streem SB. The absence of crossing vessels in association with ureteropelvic junction obstruction detected by prenatal ultrasonography. J Urol 1998;160:973-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62673-9
  14. Ross JH, Kay R. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in anomalous kidneys. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:219-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70010-0
  15. Klahr S. Pathophysiology of obstructive nephropathy. Kidney Int 1983;23:414-26 https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1983.36
  16. Stock JA, Krous HF, Heffernan J, Packer M, Kaplan GW. Correlation of renal biopsy and radionuclide renal scan differential function in patients with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1995;154:716-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67142-8
  17. Josephson S. Experimental obstructive hydronephrosis in newborn rats. III. Long-term effects on renal function. J Urol 1983;129:396-400 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)52125-4
  18. Josephson S, Ericson AC, Sjoquist M. Experimental obstructive hydronephrosis in newborn rats. VI. Long-term effects on glomerular filtration and distribution. J Urol 1985;134:391-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)47184-9
  19. Josephson S, Robertson B, Claesson G, Wikstad I. Experimental obstructive hydronephrosis in newborn rats. I. Surgical technique and long-term morphologic effects. Invest Urol 1980;17:478-83
  20. Josephson S, Wolgast M, Ojteg G. Experimental obstructive hydronephrosis in newborn rats. II. Long-term effects on renal blood flow distribution. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1982;16:179-85 https://doi.org/10.3109/00365598209179750
  21. Koff SA. Pathophysiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Clinical and experimental observations. Urol Clin North Am 1990;17:263-72
  22. Koff SA, Hayden LJ, Cirulli C, Shore R. Pathophysiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: experimental and clinical observations. J Urol 1986;136:336-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)44859-2
  23. Steinhardt GF, Ramon G, Salinas-Madrigal L. Glomerulosclerosis in obstructive uropathy. J Urol 1988;140:1316-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42034-9
  24. Ekinci S, Ciftci AO, Atilla P, Muftuoglu S, Senocak ME, Buyukpamukcu N. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction causes histologic alterations in contralateral kidney. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1650-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00578-5
  25. Chiou YY, Shieh CC, Cheng HL, Tang MJ. Intrinsic expression of Th2 cytokines in urothelium of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Kidney Int 2005;67:638-46 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.67120.x
  26. Schreiner GF, Harris KP, Purkerson ML, Klahr S. Immunological aspects of acute ureteral obstruction: immune cell infiltrate in the kidney. Kidney Int 1988;34:487-93 https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1988.207
  27. Yarger WE, Schocken DD, Harris RH. Obstructive nephropathy in the rat: possible roles for the renin-angiotensin system, prostaglandins, and thromboxanes in postobstructive renal function. J Clin Invest 1980;65:400-12 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109683
  28. Ishidoya S, Morrissey J, McCracken R, Klahr S. Delayed treatment with enalapril halts tubulointerstitial fibrosis in rats with obstructive nephropathy. Kidney Int 1996;49:1110-9 https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1996.161
  29. Pimentel JL Jr, Sundell CL, Wang S, Kopp JB, Montero A, Martinez-Maldonado M. Role of angiotensin II in the expression and regulation of transforming growth factor-beta in obstructive nephropathy. Kidney Int 1995;48:1233-46 https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1995.407
  30. Tataranni G, Farinelli R, Zavagli G, Logallo G, Farinelli A. Tubule recovery after obstructive nephropathy relief: the value of enzymuria and microproteinuria. J Urol 1987;138:24-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42975-2
  31. Zanardo V, Da Riol R, Faggian D, Plebani M, Largajolli G, Zacchello G. Urinary beta-2-microglobulin excretion in prematures with respiratory distress syndrome. Child Nephrol Urol 1990;10:135-8
  32. Huland H, Gonnermann D, Werner B, Possin U. A new test to predict reversibility of hydronephrotic atrophy after stable partial unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Urol 1988;140:1591-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42133-1
  33. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23:478-80 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02012459
  34. Dejter SW Jr, Gibbons MD. The fate of infant kidneys with fetal hydronephrosis but initially normal postnatal sonography. J Urol 1989;142:661-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38846-8
  35. Mearini L, Rosi P, Zucchi A, Del Zingaro M, Mearini E, Costantini E. Color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of vascular abnormalities associated with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Endourol 2003;17:745-50 https://doi.org/10.1089/089277903770802290
  36. Kincaid W, Hollman AS, Azmy AF. Doppler ultrasound in pelviureteric junction obstruction in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:765-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(94)90365-4
  37. Kass EJ, Fink-Bennett D. Contemporary techniques for the radioisotopic evaluation of the dilated urinary tract. Urol Clin North Am 1990;17:273-89
  38. Heyman S, Duckett JW. The extraction factor: an estimate of single kidney function in children during routine radionuclide renography with 99mtechnetium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. J Urol 1988;140:780-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)41811-8
  39. Roarke MC, Sandler CM. Provocative imaging. Diuretic renography. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:227-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70011-2
  40. Koff SA, Binkovitz L, Coley B, Jayanthi VR. Renal pelvis volume during diuresis in children with hydronephrosis: implications for diagnosing obstruction with diuretic renography. J Urol 2005;174:303-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000161217.47446.0b
  41. Conway JJ, Maizels M. The 'well tempered' diuretic renogram: a standard method to examine the asymptomatic neonate with hydronephrosis or hydroureteronephrosis. A report from combined meetings of The Society for Fetal Urology and members of The Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Council--The Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med 1992;33:2047-51
  42. Capolicchio G, Jednak R, Dinh L, Salle JL, Brzezinski A, Houle AM. Supranormal renographic differential renal function in congenital hydronephrosis: fact, not artifact. J Urol 1999;161:1290-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61671-9
  43. Ham WS, Jeong HJ, Han SW, Kim JH, Kim DK. Increased nephron volume is not a cause of supranormal renographic differential renal function in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2004;172:1108-10 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000135324.17766.5f
  44. Dejter SW Jr, Eggli DF, Gibbons MD. Delayed management of neonatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 1988;140:1305-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42032-5
  45. Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. The long-term followup of newborns with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated nonoperatively. J Urol 2000;164:1101-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67262-X
  46. Koff SA, Campbell KD. The nonoperative management of unilateral neonatal hydronephrosis: natural history of poorly functioning kidneys. J Urol 1994;152:593-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32658-7
  47. Onen A, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. Long-term followup of prenatally detected severe bilateral newborn hydronephrosis initially managed nonoperatively. J Urol 2002;168:1118-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64604-6
  48. Koff SA, Campbell K. Nonoperative management of unilateral neonatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 1992;148:525-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36644-2
  49. Murphy JP, Holder TM, Ashcraft KW, Sharp RJ, Goodwin CD, Amoury RA. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the newborn. J Pediatr Surg 1984;19:642-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(84)80347-4
  50. King LR, Coughlin PW, Bloch EC, Bowie JD, Ansong K, Hanna MK. The case for immediate pyeloplasty in the neonate with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1984;132:725-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)49843-0
  51. Tapia J, Gonzalez R. Pyeloplasty improves renal function and somatic growth in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1995;154:218-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67280-X
  52. Glick PL, Harrison MR, Noall RA, Villa RL. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero III. Early mid-trimester ureteral obstruction produces renal dysplasia. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:681-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(83)80003-7
  53. Ransley PG, Dhillon HK, Gordon I, Duffy PG, Dillon MJ, Barratt TM. The postnatal management of hydronephrosis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound. J Urol 1990;144:584-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39528-9
  54. Cartwright PC, Duckett JW, Keating MA, Snyder HM 3rd, Escala J, Blyth B, et al. Managing apparent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the newborn. J Urol 1992;148:1224-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36867-2
  55. Chertin B, Pollack A, Koulikov D, Rabinowitz R, Hain D, Hadas-Halpren I, et al. Conservative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis: lessons learned after 16 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 2006;49:734-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.046
  56. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 1949;21:209-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1949.tb10773.x
  57. Streem SB. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Open operative intervention. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:331-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70022-7
  58. Ramsay JW, Miller RA, Kellett MJ, Blackford HN, Wickham JE, Whitfield HN. Percutaneous pyelolysis: indications, complications and results. Br J Urol 1984;56:586-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1984.tb06122.x
  59. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35898-6
  60. Park SJ, Kim YS, Lee HY, Han SW. Appropriate follow-up ultrasonography interval after pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Korean J Urol 2008;49:1018-23 https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2008.49.11.1018
  61. Park SC, Ji YH, Park YS, Kim KS. Change of hydronephrosis after pyeloplasty in children with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Korean J Urol 2005;46:586-92
  62. Cockrell SN, Hendren WH. The importance of visualizing the ureter before performing a pyeloplasty. J Urol 1990;144:588-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39529-0
  63. Kim JW, Han SW, Choi SK. The postoperative prognosis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction according to the appearance of the ureter of preoperative retrograde pyelography. Korean J Urol 2003;44:550-5
  64. Kim DS, Noh JY, Jeong HJ, Kim MJ, Jeon HJ, Han SW. Elastin content of the renal pelvis and ureter determines post-pyeloplasty recovery. J Urol 2005;173:962-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000157003.04760.c3
  65. Song C, Park H, Park S, Moon KH, Kim KS. The change in renal function in the supranormal hydronephrotic kidney after pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2007;99:1483-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06774.x

Cited by

  1. 선천성 수신증 환자군과 첫 발열성 요로감염으로 진단 시 발견된 수신증 환자군에서 임상적 특징에 따른 발열성 요로감염의 발생률 vol.14, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3339/jkspn.2010.14.2.184
  2. Morphological and functional outcome of dismembered pyeloplasty in children with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction vol.21, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2015.04.003
  3. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children and adolescents : long-term results vol.11, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.xps.0000470548.75213.6c
  4. Five years’ experience of laparoscopic-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty : vol.14, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.xps.0000546336.13967.0c
  5. CT Imaging of Emergent Renal Conditions vol.39, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2017.11.003
  6. Can urinary biomarkers be used in the outcome assessment of pyeloplasty in children? vol.27, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-021-00217-y