Physicochemical Characteristics of Soybean Pastes Containing Sword Bean

작두콩 첨가 된장의 이화학적 특성

  • Received : 2009.03.30
  • Accepted : 2009.07.23
  • Published : 2009.08.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to analyse the physicochemical characteristics of soybean pastes with the sword beans and general soybean pastes. There was no difference in contents of general component (moisture contents, crude ash, crude fiber, crude fat) among the soybean pastes, but contents of crude protein was higher in J1, J2 compared to the others. Amylase activity was higher in J3, J4 adding the rice, and protease activity was higher in J1, J2 that has higher soybean contents than the others. Reducing sugar contents was higher in J3, J4 that has high amlyase activity with value of 8.53${\pm}$0.45% and 8.36${\pm}$1.05%, and amino-type nitrogen contents was higher in commercial soybean paste K5, K6 than other soybean pastes with value of 668.34${\pm}$4.11 mg% and 642.64${\pm}$2.05 mg% respectively.

작두콩 된장의 품질특성을 알아보기 위해 재래식 방법으로 제조한 된장에 작두콩을 8.0% 첨가한 된장(J2)과 재래식 쌀 된장에 작두콩을 6.0% 첨가한 된장(J4)을 제조하여 시판된장(K1-K6) 및 일반 재래 된장(J1, J3)과의 시험분석을 하였다. 수분, 회분 등 일반성분결과, 시료간 차이는 없었으나, 조단백질 함량과 protease 활성은 다른 시료에 비해 콩함량이 높은 J1과 J2가 높게 나타났으며, amylase 활성과 환원당 함량은 쌀을 첨가하여 제조한 J3과 J4가 다른 시료보다 높게 나타났다. 또한 아미노태 질소 함량은 시판된장인 K5와 K6에서 각각 668.34mg%와 642.64mg% 함량을 나타내어 다른 시료보다 높게 측정되었으며, 색도는 시료간에 유의적인 차이가 있었으며 작두콩 첨가가 색도에 큰 영향을 미치지는 않았다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 진천군

References

  1. AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Associationof official analytical chemists. Washington DC, USA
  2. Ahn SC, Bog HJ. 2007. Consumption pattern and sensory evaluationof traditional doenjang and commercial doenjang. Korean J.Food Culture 22: 633-644
  3. Anson ML. 1939. The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain andcathepsin with hemoglobin. J. Gen. Physiol. 22: 79-91
  4. Chae, S. K. 1998. Standard food analysis : theory & practice. JiguPublishing. pp. 403-404
  5. Cho YS, Bae YI, Shim KH. 1999. Chemical components in differentparts of Korean sword bean(canavalia gladiata). Korean J.Postharvest Sci. Technol. 6: 475-480
  6. In ZP. 2000. Flavor enhancement of chunggukjang by addition of yucca(yucca shidigera) extract. MS thesis. Konkuk University.Korea
  7. Joo SJ, Choi KJ, Kim KS, Lee JW, Park SK. 2002. Characteristicsof yogurt prepared with jimpum bean and sword bean(Canavalin Gladiata). Korean J. Postharvest Sci. Technol. 8:308-312
  8. Jung SW, Kim YS, Chung KS. 1995. Effects of preparation methodsand aging temperatures on the properties of rice-doenjang.Agr. Chem. Biotechnol. 38: 83-89
  9. Jung SW, Kwon DJ, Koo MS, Kim YS. 1994. Quality characteristicsacceptance for doenjang prepared with rice. Agri. Chem.and Biotechnol. 37: 266-271
  10. Kim HL, Lee TS, Noh Bs, Park JS. 1998. Characteristics ofsamjangs prepared with different doenjangs as a main material.Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 30: 54
  11. Kim JH, Yoo JS, Lee CH, Kim SY, Lee SK. 2006. Qualityproperties of soybean pastes made from meju with mold producingprotease isolated from traditional meju. J. Korean Soc. Appl.Biol. Chem. 49: 7-14
  12. Kim MJ, Rhee HS. 1990. Studies on the changes of taste compoundsduring soy paste fermentation. Korean J. Soc. Food Sci.6: 1-8
  13. Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim BH, Kang SG, Jung ST. 2000. Fermentationof doenjang prepared with sea salts. Korean J. Food Sci.Technol. 32: 1365-1370
  14. Kim SS, Kim KT, Hong HD. 2001. Development of chunggukjangadding the sword beans. Korean Soybean Society. 18: 33-50
  15. Kum JS, Han O. 1997. Changes in physicochemical properties ofKochujang and doenjang prepared with extrudated wheat flour duringfermentation. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 26: 601-605
  16. Lee CH, Kim WC, Rhee IK, Lee OS, Park HD. 2006. Changes inthe physicochemical property, angiotensin converting enzymeinhibitory effect and antimutagenicity during the fermentation ofKorean traditional soy paste(doenjang). Korean J. Food Preserv.13: 603-610
  17. Lee KH, Cho SH. 2003. Effect of the combined fermentation withAspergillus oryzae and Bacillus natto on the quality improvementof doenjang meju. J. Agr. Life Sci. 37: 9-21
  18. Lee KS, Lee JK, Hwang ES, Lee SS, Oh MJ. 2002. Quality of 4-recommended soybean cultivars for meju and doenjang. KoreanJ. Food Preserv. 9: 205-211
  19. Mok CK, Song KT, Lee JY, Park YS, Lim SB. 2005. Changes inmicroorganisms and enzyme activity of low salt soybeanpaste(doenjang) during fermentation. Food Engineering Progress.9: 112-117
  20. Park JS, Lee MR, Kim JS, Lee TS. 1994. Compositions of nitrogencompound and amino acid in soybean paste(doenjang) preparedwith different microbial sources. Korean J. Food Sci.Technol. 26: 609-615
  21. Park SK, Seo KI, Choi SH, Moon JS, Lee YH. 2000. Qualityassessment of commercial doenjang prepared by traditionalmethod. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 29(2): 211-217
  22. Rhee CH, Lee JB, Jang SM. 2000. Changes of microorganisms,enzyme activity and physiological functionality in the traditionaldoenjang with various concentrations of Lentinus edodes duringfermentation. J. Korean Soc. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. 43: 277-284
  23. Seo JH, Jeong YJ. 2001. Quality characteristics for doenjang usingsquid internal organs. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 33: 89-93
  24. Seo JS, Han EM, Lee TS. 1986. Effect of meju shapes and strainson the chemical composition of soybean paste. J. Korean Soc.Food Nutr. 15: 1-9
  25. Yang SH, Son DH, Ji WD. 1997. The quality of traditional koreanchunggukjang. Korean Soc. Ind. Food Technol. 1: 32-36
  26. Yoo SK, Kang SM, Noh YS. 2000. Quality properties on soybeanpastes made with microorganism isolated from traditional soybeanpastes. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 32: 1266-1270