Journal of dental hygiene science (치위생과학회지)

The Korean Society of Dental Hygiene Science (한국치위생과학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Relationship between Halitosis Developments and Oral Environmental

구취발생과 구강환경의 연관성에 관한 연구

  • Jee, Yun-Jeong (Dept. Dental Hygiene, Choonhae College of Health Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Sool (Dept. Dental Hygiene, Choonhae College of Health Sciences) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Hwa (Dept. Dental Hygiene, Choonhae College of Health Sciences) ;
  • Jeon, Eun-Suk (Dept. Dental Hygiene, Choonhae College of Health Sciences)
  • Received : 2010.03.11
  • Accepted : 2010.04.21
  • Published : 2010.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analysis know the important oral environmental factors which affect halitosis components of the adult in order to provide basic data for halitosis prevention and establish a device to eliminate halitosis efficiently. The 97 adults who visited at the Dental Clinic in Metropolis (M=68, F=30) participated in this study that performed from March in 2009 to in 2010. The obtained results through items as caries status, periodontal status, salivary flow, the viscosity, pH, Snyder test, plaque deposit, tongue plaque and halitosis check were as followings. The average shame of halitosis components appeared at hydrogen sulfide 36.71 ppb methyl mercaptan 31.46ppb dimethyl sulfide 54.33 ppb and Ammonia 22.60 ppm. The normality and the detection comparative result dimethyl sulfide above reverse appeared highly at 46.9%, ammonia appeared highly at 52%. According to the Hydrogen sulfide level was a high relationship among age, CPI, tongue coat status, DMFT index which were statistically significant (p<0.05). According to the quantity of hydrogen sulfide level there was relationship where tongue coat status Saliva flow rate considers statistically(p<0.05). The quantity of methyl mercaptan level there was relationship where Dimethyl sulfide level, tongue coat status, Saliva flow rate considers statistically(p<0.05). The quantity of Dimethyl sulfide level there was relationship where Hydrogen sulfide level, ammonia level, tongue coat status, Saliva pH and Saliva flow rate considers statistically(p<0.05). Ammonia level there was relationship where Methyl mercaptan level, CPI, and Saliva flow rate considers statistically(p<0.05).

본 연구는 구취의 원인을 분류하고, 각 성분들에 영향을 미치는 구강환경 요인들과 어떤 관련성이 있는지를 조사하여 구취환자 개개인의 구강건강을 증진시키고 구취관련의 올바른 보건교육에 활용하고자 실시하였으며, 2009년 3월 1일부터 2010년 3월 1일까지 1년간 대도시 소재 치과병원 외래환자 98명의 자료를 최종분석에 이용한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 구취의 각 성분인 Hydrogen sulfide, Methyl mercaptan, Dimethyl sulfide 및 Ammonia의 평균 수치는 Hydrogen sulfide 36.71 ppb, Methyl mercaptan은 31.46 ppb, Dimethyl sulfide는 54.33 ppb, Ammonia는 22.60 ppm로 나타났고, 정상과 역치 이상의 검출비교 결과 Dimethyl sulfide는 46.9%가 역치 이상으로 검출되었고, Ammonia는 연구대상자 중 52%가 역치 이상으로 검출되어 가장 높게 나타났다. 2. Hydrogen sulfide 성분의 양에 따라 Dimethyl sulfide 성분의 양, 설태의 양과 타액 분비율이 통계적으로 유의한 관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다(p<0.05). 3. Methyl mercaptan 성분의 양은 Dimethyl sulfide의 성분과 설태량, 타액 분비율과 통계적으로 유의한 관계가 있었다(p<0.05). 4. Dimethyl sulfide성분의 양은 Hydrogen sulfide성분, Ammonia성분과 관련이 있었으며, 설태의 양, 타액분비율, 타액내 수소이온농도지수와도 관계가 있었다(p<0.05). 5. Ammonia성분은 Methyl mercaptan성분과 Dimethyl sulfide성분, 치주필요지수(CPI), 타액 분비율이 통계적으로 유의한 관계가 있었다(p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Kim JB et al.: Preventive dentistry. Komunsa Seoul, pp.331. 2005.
  2. Hong JP: Halitosis and oral disease. The Journal of Korean Dental Association 36(1): 29-31. 1998.
  3. Rosenberg M: Clinical assessment of bad breath: current concepts. Shinhung international, Seoul, pp. 1-10. 1998.
  4. Rosenberg M, Knaan T, Cohen D: Optical bio-sniffer for methyl mercaptan in halitosis. Anal Chim Acta 573(28): 75-80. 2006.
  5. Brunette DM: Introduction to the proceedings of the fifth international conference on breath odour research. Int Dent J 52(3): 177-80, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.2002.tb00920.x
  6. Tonzctich J, Richter VJ: Evaluation oh volatie odoriferous components of saliva. Arch Oral Biol 16(1): 39-46. 1964.
  7. Jung MY, Lee ES: Factors influence the oral malodor development. J Korean Acad Dental Hygiene Education 8(1):119-31, 2008.
  8. Jung HY: A clinical study on the oral malodor related to the saliva and tongue plaque. J Clinical Preventive Dentistry 1(1): 54-63, 2005.
  9. Jee YJ: Correlation co-efficiency between the oral malodor and the critical periodontal index. J Clinical Preventive Dentistry 2(1): 42-52. 2006.
  10. Lee DN et al.: A study for the relationship between systemic diseases and oral malodor. The Journal of Korean academy of oral medicine 2(2): 119-126, 2004.
  11. Miyazaki H. Saba S, Katoh Y: Correlation between volatile sulphur compounds and certain oral health measurements in the general population. J Periodontol 66(8): 679-84. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.8.679
  12. Hinode D, Fukui M, Yokoyama N: Relationship between tongue coating and secretory -immunoglobulin a level in saliva obtained from patients complaining of oral malodor. J Clin Periodontol 30(12) : 1017-23. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0303-6979.2003.00407.x
  13. Tsai CC et al: The levels of volatile sulfur compounds in mouth air from patients with chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res 43(2): 186-93, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.01011.x
  14. Bae SM, Lee JY: The effect of a full mouth disinfection on oral malodor in chronic periodontitis patients. The Journal of Korean academy of periodontology 36(4): 829-838, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2006.36.4.829
  15. Amano A et al.: Mornitering ammonia to asses halitosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod 94(4): 692-6. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.126911
  16. Lee YO. Lee TH, Min HH: Relationship between oral environment and halitosis. J Korean Acad Dental Hygiene Education 9(1): 125-139, 2009.
  17. Eli I et al.: Self-perception of breath odor. J Am Dent Assoc 132(5): 621-6, 2002.
  18. Liu PF et al.: Vaccination targeting surface foma of fusobacterium nucleatum against bacterial co-aggregation implication for treatment of periodomal infection and halitosis. Vaccine 2010 Feb 26.
  19. Lear R, Lear CS: Salivary flow rate: system for continuous monitoring. J Dent Res 49(6): 1557, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490067501
  20. Quifynen M et al.: A salivary incubation test for evaluation of oml malodor: a pilot study. J Periodontol 74(7): 937-44. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.937
  21. Kleinberg I, Westbay G: Salivary and metabolic factors involved in oral malodor formation. J Periodontol 63(9): 768-75.1992. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.9.768