Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Customer Perceptions of Service Quality for Library E-Service: Based on Zeithaml & Bitner's Model

도서관 E-Service 품질에 대한 소비자인식 결정요인에 대한 연구: Zeithaml과 Bitner모형을 중심으로

  • 이성신 (경북대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2010.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest a revised model for library e-service quality research based on Zeithaml & Bitner's model. To achieve this purpose, this study reviews the previous literature related to the study of service quality and e-service. According to the study results, 'physical quality' is the most important factor which influences on the customer perceptions of library e-service quality. Furthermore, this study suggests eight service quality dimensions of 'physical quality' for library e-service. In addition, customer's personal factors and previous experiences with similar services can be regarded as important factors which influence on the 'physical quality' of library e-service.

본 연구는 Zeithaml과 Bitner모형을 도서관 E-Service품질 연구를 위해 수정 제안하고자 하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 문헌조사방법을 사용하였으며 연구결과 '환경적 품질'이 도서관 E-Service품질에 대한 소비자인식을 결정하는데 있어서 가장 중요한 요소임이 밝혀졌다. 이와 더불어 기존의 E-Service 관련연구와 사용성연구와의 비교 분석을 통해 도서관 E-Service를 위한 '환경적 품질'의 하부차원들을 제시하였다. 도서관 E-Service의 '환경적 품질'에 영향을 미치는 요소로서는 '기술적 요소에 대한 개인적 인식'과 '과거의 유사서비스 사용경험'이 중요한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강회일, 정용길. 2002. 도서관의 온라인 서비스품질 평가: e-LibQual의 적용. 정보관리학회지, 19(3): 237-261.
  2. 오동근, 임영규, 여지숙. 2009. 이용자가 인식하는 공공도서관 서비스품질 결정요인 분석. 정보관리연구, 40(2): 47-70.
  3. 이응봉, 이주현. 2003. 디지털도서관 웹사이트사용성 평가기준 개발에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3): 129-153.
  4. 장윤금. 2007. 공공도서관의 e-서비스 품질평가와 이용자 만족도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(4): 315-329.
  5. 홍현진. 2005. 도서관의 정보서비스 품질평가 연구에 관한 고찰. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 36(2): 93-120.
  6. 황재영, 이응봉, 김종환. 2007. 디지털도서관의 e-서비스품질 평가에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(3): 55-79.
  7. Burgess, Lois. "A Conceptual framework for understanding and measuring perceived service quality in net-based customer support systems."[online]. [cited 2009. 12.30]. .
  8. Collier, Joel. and Bienstock, Carol. 2009. "Model misspecification: Contrasting formative and reflective indicators for a model of E-Service quality." Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3): 283-293. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679170306
  9. Cristobal, Eduard., Flavian, Carlos. and Guinaliu, Miguel. 2007. "Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ)." Managing Service Quality, 17(3): 317-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710744326
  10. Froehle, Craig. and Roth, Aleda. 2004. "New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience." Journal of Operations Management, 22: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.004
  11. Gurau, Calin. 2003. "Tailoring e-service quality through CRM." Managing Service Quality, 13(6): 520-531. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310506577
  12. Hernon, Peter. and Calert, Philip. 2005. "EService quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions." Library & Information Science Research, 27(3): 377-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.04.005
  13. Lee, Jungki and Allaway, Arthur. 2002. "Effects of personal control on adoption of self-service technology innovations." Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6): 553-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210443418
  14. Lee, Seongsin. 2008. Academic Library Service Consumer(User) Motivation Study Based on Expectancy Theory, Ph.D. diss., Florida State University.
  15. Oyedele, Adesegun and Simpson, Penny. 2007. "An empirical investigation of consumer control factors on intention to use selected self-service technologies." International Journal of Service, 18(3): 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230710751497
  16. Rowley, Jennifer. 2006. "An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda." Internet Research, 16(3): 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610673736
  17. Sahadev, Sunil. and Purani, Keyoor. 2008. "Modeling the consequences of e-service quality." Marketing Intelligence & Planning 26(6): 605-620. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902857
  18. Santos, Fessica. 2003. "E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions." Managing Service Quality, 13(3): 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310476490
  19. Voss, Christopher. 2003. "Rethinking paradigms of service-servicein a virtual environment." International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(1): 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310453271
  20. Walker, Rhett. and Johnson, Lester. 2006. "Why consumers use and do not use technology-enabled services." Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2): 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610657057
  21. Zeithaml, Valarie. 2002. "Service excellence in electronic channels." Managing Service Quality, 12(3): 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520210429187
  22. Zeithaml, Valarie. and Bitner, Mary. 2003. Services Marketing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  23. Zeithaml, Valarie., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra, A. 2002. "A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implications for future research and managerial practice." MSI Working Paper Series, No 00-115: 1-49.

Cited by

  1. Developing LCSI(Library Customer Satisfaction Index) Lite for Public Library vol.47, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.335