DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Associated with Cancer Screening Intention in Eligible Persons for National Cancer Screening Program

국가 암 조기검진 대상자의 암 검진 수검의도 관련 요인

  • Kim, Rock-Bum (Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Ki-Soo (Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hong, Dae-Yong (Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Cheol-Heon (Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention) ;
  • Kim, Jang-Rak (Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 김록범 (경상대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실 및 건강과학연구원) ;
  • 박기수 (경상대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실 및 건강과학연구원) ;
  • 홍대용 (경상대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실 및 건강과학연구원) ;
  • 이철헌 (질병관리본부) ;
  • 김장락 (경상대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실 및 건강과학연구원)
  • Published : 2010.01.31

Abstract

Objectives: To identify factors associated with cancer screening intention using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Methods: Among 55,920 eligible persons for National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) in J city, 1,100 individuals were contacted. Of these, 797 were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Thirty-six responses were excluded due to incomplete data. The remaining 761 completed questionnaires were analyzed to find factors associated with cancer screening intention. Results: Cancer screening intention was significantly associated with behavioral attitude (p<0.01) and subjective norm (p<0.01), but not with perceived behavioral control (p=0.29) in the TPB model. These three constructs explained 29.7% of cancer screening intention in multiple linear regression analysis. External factors such as socio-demographic status, health and health behavior variables explained 8.9% of screening intention. Among them, household monthly income, past cancer screening experience, exercise and daily eating habit were significantly associated with screening intention. Conclusions: Cancer screening intention may be influenced by focusing attitude, subjective norm in TPB model and other external factors. However, further studies are warranted to identify factors influencing cancer screening intention and behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Health Data, 2008 Statistics and Indicators. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2008.
  2. Korea National Statistical Office. 2002-2007 Yearbook on Health and Welfare Statistiscs. Daejeon: Korea National Statistical Office; 2007. (Korean)
  3. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. World Cancer Report. Geneva; WHO; 2003.
  4. National Cancer Information Center. Prevention and screening for cancer. [cited 2009 Jan 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.cancer.go.kr/cms/index.html. (Korean)
  5. National Cancer Center. 2008 Survey of Cancer Screening Rates in Korea People. Goyang: National Cancer Center; 2008. (Korean)
  6. USA, National Cancer Institute. Cancer trends progress report - 2007 update. [cited 2009 Jan 30]. Available from: URL: http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/atlas/progressreport/ alacarte/.
  7. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. Cancer screening annual review 2007. [cited 2009 Jan 30]. Available from: URL:http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/.
  8. Bae SS. Health-related behaviors: Theoretical models and research findings. Korean J Prev Med 1993; 26(4): 508-533. (Korean)
  9. Ajzen I. Construting a TpB questionnaire : Conceptual and methodological consideration. [cited 2009 Jan 30]. Available from: URL : http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/ pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
  10. Fazekas A, Senn CY, Ledgerwood DM. Predictors of intention to use condoms among university women: An application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Can J Behav Sci 2001; 33(2): 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087133
  11. Simsekoglu O, Lajunen T. Social psychology of seat belt use: A comparison of theory of planned behavior and health belief model. Transport Res Part F 2008; 11(3): 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.10.001
  12. Cha ES, Doswell WM, Kim KH, Charron-Prochownik D, Patrick TE. Evaluating the theory of planned behavior to explain intention to engage in premarital sex amongst Korean college students: A questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2007; 44(7): 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.015
  13. Feng JY, Wu YW. Nurses'intention to report child abuse in Taiwan: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Res Nurs Health 2005; 28(4): 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20087
  14. Tolma EL, Reininger BM, Evans A, Ureda J. Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of selfefficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Educ Behav 2006; 33(2): 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198105277393
  15. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001; 40(Pt 4): 471-499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
  16. Kwak MS, Park EC, Bang JY, Sung NY, Lee JY, Choi KS. Factors associated with cancer screening participation, Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2005; 38(4): 473-481. (Korean)
  17. Hahm MI, Choi KS, Kye SY, Kwak MS, Park EC. Factors influencing the intention to have stomach cancer screening. J Prev Med Public Health 2007; 40(3): 205-212. (Korean) https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.3.205
  18. Han CH, Park JY, Kam S, Kim SA, Park KS. A model study on medical utilization of workers with nonoccupational diseases: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2006; 18(4): 284-297. (Korean)
  19. Katz MH. Multivariable Analysis. A Practical Guide for Clinicians. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 66.
  20. Rutter DR. Attendance and reattendance for berast cancer screening: A prospective 3-year test of the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Health Psychol 2000; 5: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910700168720
  21. Rimer BK, Glanz K. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. 2nd ed. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2005. p. 15- 18.
  22. Kim GS. Research Methodology of a Causal Relationship Analysis using Amos/Lisrel. Seoul: Cheong-Rham Co.; 2006.
  23. Myers RE, Wolf TA, McKee L, McGrory G, Burgh DY, Nelson G. et al. Factors associated with intention to undergo annual prostate cancer screening among African American men in Philadelphia. Cancer 1996; 78(3): 471- 479. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960801)78:3<471::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-W
  24. Lee KS, Kim YI, Kim CY, Shin YS. Application of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action to predicting cervix cancer screening behavior. Korean J Prev Med 2001; 34(4): 379-388. (Korean)
  25. Hahm MI, Kang MG, Park CS, Cho WH. Customer's intention to use hospital-based health promotion services. Korean J Prev Med 2003; 36(2): 108-116. (Korean) https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2002.1132
  26. Choi KS, Yang JH, Kye SY, Lee SH, Park EC, Shin HR, et al. Factors associated with performance of national cancer screening program in korea. Korean J Prev Med 2004; 37(3): 246-252. (Korean)
  27. Rothengatter T, Manstead ASR. The Role of Subjective Norm in Predicting the Intention to Commit Traffic Violation. Traffic and Transport Psychology, Theory and Application ;1997. p. 389-394.
  28. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioural control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 2002; 32(4): 665-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
  29. Devellis BM, Blalock SJ, Sandler RS. Predicting participation in cancer screening: The role of perceived behavioral control. J Appl Soc Psychol 2006; 20(8): 639- 660.
  30. Drossaert CHC, Boer H, Seydel ER. Prospective study on the determinants of repeat attendance and attendance patterns in breast cancer screening using the theory of planned behaviour. Psychol Health 2003; 18(5): 551-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044031000141207
  31. Orbell S, Hagger M, Brown V, Tidy J. Comparing two theories of health behavior: A prospective study of noncompletion of treatment following cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol 2006; 25(5): 604-615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.604
  32. Cullen KW, Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Koehly L. Measuring stage of change for fruit and vegetable consumption in 9- to 12- year-old girls. J Behav Med 1998; 21(3): 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018764932609
  33. Prislin R, Dyer JA, Blakely CH, Johnson CD. Immunization status and socio-demographic characteristics: The mediating role of beliefs, attiutude, and perceived control. Am J Public Health 1999; 88(12): 1821- 1826.
  34. Paul S, Carol AG, Richard S. The dimensional structure of the perceived behavioral control construct. J Appl Soc Pshychol 1997; 27(5): 418-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00639.x

Cited by

  1. Attitudes et perception de contrôle des personnes âgées envers la prise de médicaments à action anxiolytique, sédative et hypnotique (ASH) vol.30, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980810000784
  2. 건강보험 건강검진 대상자들의 예방적 의료서비스 이용 특성 vol.11, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2011.11.2.331
  3. 암 조기발견 지식.암발생 위험성 지각과 암 조기검진 수검 여부와의 관계: 40세 이상 일반인 대상으로 vol.12, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.1.52
  4. 제조업 근로자의 암 검진 관련 요인 vol.22, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2013.22.3.179
  5. 일 광역단위에서의 사회경제적 수준과 위암 수검률과의 관련성 vol.38, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5393/jamch.2013.38.3.174
  6. Awareness of Pap testing and factors associated with intent to undergo Pap testing by level of sexual experience in unmarried university students in Korea: results from an online survey vol.14, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-100
  7. 고연령 미혼여성의 건강검진에 영향을 미치는 요인 vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2014.20.1.92
  8. 영유아 건강검진 완전수검 여부 관련 요인 vol.24, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2014.24.3.261
  9. Factors Affecting Cancer Screening Intention and Behavior of the Korean Elderly vol.15, pp.19, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.19.8461
  10. 지역 환경적 요인이 한국 여성의 유방암 조기검진 수검률에 미치는 영향 : 국민건강영양조사 제 4기를 중심으로 vol.12, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2014.12.11.437
  11. Health Screening among HBV Carriers in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey V (KNHANES V) vol.16, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.3653
  12. 현미경 진단용 슬라이드 제작을 위한 단층세포 흡착장치 개발 vol.36, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.9718/jber.2015.36.1.1
  13. 암검진 수검 노인의 재수검의도에 미치는 요인 vol.18, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2015.118
  14. Health Beliefs Associated with Cancer Screening Intentions in Korean Workers vol.17, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14456/apjcp.2016.92/apjcp.2016.17.7.3301
  15. 중년남성의 국가암 검진수검 관련요인 vol.10, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2016.10.3.051
  16. 인천광역시 국가암검진 홍보방법과 수검률의 관련성 vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2016.26.4.382
  17. 소득수준에 따른 암 검진 이용현황 분석: 2014년 국민건강영양조사 자료를 중심으로 vol.15, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2017.15.1.329
  18. Perception about Age at the Start and End of Periodic Health Examinations: a Survey-based Study on University Hospital in Korea vol.17, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.3.161
  19. Participation inequality in the National General Health Examination based on enterprise size vol.29, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0159-y
  20. Developing the High-Risk Drinking Scorecard Model in Korea vol.9, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.5.04
  21. 전립선암 검진의도 구조모형 vol.30, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2019.30.4.471
  22. 장애인 암 검진 수검에 영향을 미치는 요인 vol.7, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2019.7.4.043
  23. Factors Affecting Cancer Screening Behavior in the Elderly : Based on Andersen's Model and Health Belief Model vol.23, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2020.58
  24. No Regrets When It Comes to Your Health: Anticipated Regret, Subjective Norms, Information Insufficiency and Intent to Seek Health Information from Multiple Sources vol.35, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1626535
  25. Structural Equation Modeling Analysis on Health Literacy and Cancer Prevention Behaviors among Medically-Underserved, Low-Income Populations vol.28, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2021.28.1.83