Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of Scientifically Gifted Students' Performance Processes in the Creative Tasks

과학 영재아의 창의적 과제 수행과정에서의 특성 분석

  • Received : 2010.03.31
  • Accepted : 2010.09.14
  • Published : 2010.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we investigated students' behavioral characteristics in the process of and their responses to scientific creativity activities developed based on the three steps of learning model (Park, Park, & Lee, 2008) and scientific creativity model (Park, 2004). Students' responses were obtained by questionnaire, effectiveness of learning materials was explored by comparing students activities before and after the second step, 'Guide', and various characteristic behaviors were obtained through video-recording of their activities. As results, students answered that even though the activities were a little difficult, the activities were nonetheless interesting to them, and they wanted to do the activities more completely, and wanted them in future courses. It was also found that the second step activity was helpful in improving students' divergent thinking. Finally, from the findings about various students' behavioral characteristics, some practical recommendations for more effective teaching of scientific creativity were suggested.

본 연구에서는 박종원(2004)의 과학적 창의성 모형과 3단계 수업모형(박종원, 박종석, 이강길, 2008)에 따라 개발된 과학적 창의성 활동을 과학 영재아에게 적용하여, 학생들의 과학적 창의성 활동에서 나타난 여러 가지 특징들을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 설문지로학생의 반응을 조사하였고, 학생의 활동지로부터 수업모형의 효과성을 탐색하였다. 그리고 학생의 창의성 활동 과정을 녹화한 자료로부터 학생의 여러 가지 행동특성을 조사하였다. 결과적으로 학생들은 과학적 창의성 활동이 어려운 편이었지만, 흥미 있어 하였고, 창의성에도 도움이 된다고 하였다. 또한 끝가지 과제를 수행하고 싶어 했으며, 앞으로도 이러한 과제 수행을 원하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 활동과정 중에 제시한 '안내'는 학생들의 발산적 사고에 도움을 준 것으로 나타났다. 이 외에 학생의 행동특성을 분석하여 앞으로 보다 효과적인 과학적 창의성 지도를 위한 제안들을 추출할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박종원 (2004). 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안 - 인지적 측면을 중심으로 - 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386.
  2. 박종원, 김두현 (2008). 과학의 본성 지도자료 개발과 과학영재를 대상으로 한 시험적용 . 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), 169-179.
  3. 박종원, 박종석, 이강길 (2008). 과학적 창의성 활동 자료의 개발. 한국학술진흥재단 지원 연구 결과 보고서.
  4. 박종원, 등 (2009). 과학영재 교육기관 수학.통합과학 공통교재 개발 보급. 한국과학창의재단 지원, 과학영재교육 진흥연구사업.
  5. 신원호, 정환재, 박종원 (2009). 과학자의 성장기 분석을 통한 사례 중심의 과학 영재 행동특성 체크리스트 제안. 2009년 국제학술대회 및 제 56 차 한국과학교육학회 하계 학술대회 발표. 광주: 조선대학교.
  6. 오원근 (2006). 과학자의 생애 분석을 통한 과학 영재 판별 준거. 새물리, 53(5), 361-369.
  7. Altshuller, G.S. (1984). Creativity as an Exact Science, NY: Gordon and Breach.
  8. Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534371
  9. Bull, K.S., Montgomery, D., & Baloche, L. (1995). Teaching Creativity at the College Level: A Synthesis of Curricular Components Perceived as Important by Instructors, Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_7
  10. Clapham, M. M. (1997). Ideational skills training: A key element in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1001_4
  11. Clements, D. H. (1991). Enhancement of creativity in computer environments. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028001173
  12. Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T.M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 358-389.
  13. Cropley, A.J., & Urban, K.K. (2000). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks, R.J. Sternberg., and R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 485-498). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  14. Cropley, A.J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S.R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity: Volume one (pp. 511-524.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  15. Scott. G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549
  16. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T.B Ward, S.M. Smith and J. Vaid (Eds.). Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp.461-494). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
  17. Fasco, D. (2001). Education and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3/4), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_09
  18. Fritz, R. L. (1993). Problem solving attitude among secondary marketing education students. Marketing Educators Journal, 19, 45-59.
  19. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Guildford, J.P. (1950). Creativity, American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
  21. Guildford, J.P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS.
  22. Hanson, N. R. (1961). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Mansfield, R.D., & Busse, T.V. (1981). The Psychology of Creativity and Discovery: Scientists and Their Work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  24. Mansfield, R.S., Busse, T.V., & Krepelka, E.J. (1978). The effectiveness of creativity training. Review of Educational Research, 48, 517-536. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543048004517
  25. Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392-430). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Noller, R.B., Parens, S.J., & Biondi, A.M. (1976). Creative actionbook. New York: Scribner's.
  27. Osborn, A. (1963). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. NY: Scribner's.
  28. Parens, S.J., Noller, R.B., & Biondi, A.M. (1977). Guide to Creative Action. NYC: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  29. Park, Jongwon (2004b. 7). Asia-Pacific International Conference for the Gifted. Suggesting a Model of Scientific Creativity (MSC) and Developing Scientific Creativity Activities
  30. Park, Jongwon (2006). Modelling analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis. International Journal of Science Education. 28(5), 469-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500404540
  31. Park, Jongwon., Jang, Kyoung-Ae., & Kim, Ikgyun. (2009). An analysis of the actual physicists'research and implications for scientific inquiry in school. Research in Science Education. 39, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9079-8
  32. Park, Jongwon., & Park, Jongseok. (2008.7). Establishing the Model of Scientific Creativity and the Development of Teaching Materials for Scientific Creativity . Paper presented at the 10th Asia-Pacific Conference of Giftedness. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  33. Parens, S.J. (1999). Programs and courses in creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The Creativity Research Handbook: Volume one (pp. 465-477). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  34. Peirce, C. S. (1955) Abduction and induction. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 150-156). New York: Dover Publications.
  35. Rose, L.H., & Lin, H.T. (1984). The metaanalysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00985.x
  36. Solomon, B., Powell, K., & Gardner, H. (1999). Multiple intelligences. In In M.A. Runco & S.R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity Vol. 1 (pp. 261-272). London: Academic Press.
  37. Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., & Singer, J.L. (2004). Creativity: From Potential to Realization. APA.
  38. Torrance, E.P. (1987). Teaching for creativity, In S.G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 190-215). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Press.
  39. Treffinger, D.J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213375
  40. Treffinger, D.J. , Sortore, M.R., & Cross, J.A. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks & A.H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and talent (pp. 555-567). Oxford: Pergamon.
  41. Wang, C.W., & Horng, R.Y. (2002) The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32, 35 45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00237
  42. Xu, F., McDonne.., G., & Nash, W.R. (2005). A survey of creativity courses at university in principal countries. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01251.x

Cited by

  1. Developing the Format and Samples of Teaching Materials for Scientific Creativity in the Ordinary Science Curriculum -Including Teachers' Practice and Reflection- vol.32, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.3.446
  2. Mapping Analysis of Scientific Concepts and Analogies Generated by Middle School Students about Light and Waves using Learning Materials for Generating Analogies vol.16, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.4.1189
  3. 과학적 창의성 향상을 위한 가족활동(FAISC) 프로그램의 개발과 적용 vol.33, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.114
  4. 과학적 창의성 지도를 위한 활동자료의 개발과 유형 분석 vol.33, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.310