The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of mesiodistal tooth axis using a CBCT-generated panoramic view

CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상의 근원심 치축에 관한 연구

  • Song, In-Tae (Department of Orthodontics, Sanbon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyoung (Department of Orthodontics, Sanbon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Chae, Jong-Moon (Department of Orthodontics, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Chang, Na-Young (Department of Orthodontics, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University)
  • 송인태 (원광대학교 치과대학 산본치과병원 교정과) ;
  • 조진형 (원광대학교 치과대학 산본치과병원 교정과) ;
  • 채종문 (원광대학교 치과대학 대전치과병원 교정과) ;
  • 장나영 (원광대학교 치과대학 대전치과병원 교정과)
  • Received : 2010.09.17
  • Accepted : 2011.05.26
  • Published : 2011.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to confirm the reliability of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated panoramic view based on a CBCT 3D image and to find the most helpful 2D panoramic image compared with CBCT 3D image when examining the mesiodistal tooth axis. Methods: A test model was constructed according to cephalometric norms. The test model was repeatedly repositioned for CBCT and panoramic radiographic imaging. Panoramic radiographs were acquired at each of the following 3 occlusal plane positions: $-5^{\circ}$, $0^{\circ}$, and $+5^{\circ}$. Measurements of mesiodistal tooth axis in CBCT 3D image, CBCT-generated panoramic view, and panoramic radiographs were compared. Results: Compared with the CBCT-generated panoramic view, CBCT 3D image showed significant difference in the mesiodistal tooth axis in the premolars and no significant difference in the mesiodistal tooth axis in the incisors and canines. Mesiodistal tooth axis on the CBCT-generated panoramic view was significantly different from that on panoramic radiographs. Conclusions: CBCT-generated panoramic view can be a useful tool for evaluating mesiodistal tooth axis.

본 연구에서는 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)를 이용한 삼차원 영상을 기준으로 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상 형성 시의 신뢰성을 입증하고 CBCT 삼차원 영상과 비교하여 실제 근원심 치축을 가장 잘 나타낼 수 있는 이차원 파노라마영상을 찾고자 하였다. 연구 모형은 두부계측방사선사진의 평균치에 따라 제작되었고 CBCT와 파노라마방사선영상 촬영을 위해 촬영 시마다 연구 모형이 반복적으로 재위치되었다. 파노라마방사선영상은 $-5^{\circ}$, $0^{\circ}$, $+5^{\circ}$로 연구 모형의 교합평면을 변화시키면서 촬영되었다. 이후 CBCT 삼차원 영상과 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상 및 파노라마방사선영상에서 측정된 계측값을 평가하였다. CBCT 삼차원 영상과 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상의 전치 및 견치부에서 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내지 않았으나 대부분의 소구치부에서는 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내었다. 그리고 CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상과 파노라마방사선영상은 대부분의 치아에서 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내었다. CBCT-재구성 파노라마영상이 근원심 치축 평가 시 임상적으로 사용 가능함을 보여주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Dewel BF. Clinical observations on the axial inclination of teeth. Am J Orthod 1949;35:98-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(49)90111-6
  2. Mayoral G. Treatment results with light wires studied by panoramic radiography. Am J Orthod 1982;81:489-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90428-6
  3. Ursi WJ, Almeida RR, Tavano O, Henriques JF. Assessment of mesiodistal axial inclination through panoramic radiography. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:166-73.
  4. Graber TM. Postmortems in posttreatment adjustment. Am J Orthod 1966;52:331-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(66)90151-5
  5. Edwards JG. The prevention of relapse in extraction cases. Am J Orthod 1971;60:128-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90029-7
  6. Hatasaka HH. A radiographic study of roots in extraction sites. Angle Orthod 1976;46:64-8.
  7. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 3. More breakdowns of selected variables. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:690-9.
  8. American Board of Orthodontics. Grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs [CD-ROM]. St Louis; 2002.
  9. Xie Q, Soikkonen K, Wolf J, Mattila K, Gong M, Ainamo A. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:61-6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.25.2.9446974
  10. Wyatt CC, Pharoah MJ. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:442-52.
  11. Lam EW, Ruprecht A, Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:42-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80227-6
  12. Frederiksen NL. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:540-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80153-2
  13. Garcia-Figueroa MA, Raboud DW, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:93-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.034
  14. Lucchesi MV, Wood RE, Nortje CJ. Suitability of the panoramic radiograph for assessment of mesiodistal angulation of teeth in the buccal segments of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:303-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90055-8
  15. Mckee IW, Glover KE, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations. Angle Orthod 2001;71:442-51.
  16. Jeon HS, Choi GL, Lim SH, Kim KW. Distortion of tooth axes on panoramic radiographs taken at various head positions. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:240-51. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.4.240
  17. Stramotas S, Geenty JP, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at various positions in vitro. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.1.43
  18. Choi GL, Lim SH, Kim KW, Kim JD. Change in tooth length and angulation on panoramic radiographs taken at different labiolingual and buccolingual inclinations. Korean J Orthod 2007;37:114-24.
  19. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:402-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.015
  20. Marmulla R, Wortche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:28-31. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/31342245
  21. Peck JL, Sameshima GT, Miller A, Worth P, Hatcher DC. Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT. Angle Orthod 2007;77:206-13. https://doi.org/10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0206:MRAUPA]2.0.CO;2
  22. Van Elslande D, Heo G, Flores-Mir C, Carey J, Major PW. Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by conebeam computed tomographic panoramic-like images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(4 Suppl):S94-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.028
  23. Mckee IW, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Heo G, Glover KE, Major PW. The accuracy of 4 panoramic units in the projection of mesiodistal tooth angulations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:166-75. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.119435
  24. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984;86:449-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90352-X
  25. Frykholm A, Malmgren O, Sämfors KA, Welander U. Angular measurements in orthopantomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1977;6:77-81. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.1977.0012
  26. Philipp RG, Hurst RV. The cant of the occlusal plane and distortion in the panoramic radiograph. Angle Orthod 1978;48:317-23.
  27. Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe M. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:285-90. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/87440549
  28. Samawi SS, Burke PH. Angular distortion in the orthopantomogram. Br J Orthod 1984;11:100-7. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.11.2.100
  29. Mischkowski RA, Scherer P, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25381129
  30. Scarfe WC, Nummikoski P, McDavid WD, Welander U, Tronje G. Radiographic interproximal angulations: implications for rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76:664-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(93)90079-J

Cited by

  1. Construction reproducibility of a composite tooth model composed of an intraoral-scanned crown and a cone-beam computed tomography-scanned root vol.50, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.4.229