Journal of Families and Better Life (가정과삶의질연구)

Korean Home Management Association (가정과삶의질학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Life History of Intermarried Korean Men's Family Dissolution

국제 결혼한 한국남성의 결혼해체에 관한 연구

  • 김민경 (남서울대학교 아동복지학과)
  • Received : 2011.05.14
  • Accepted : 2011.07.25
  • Published : 2011.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explored the life histories of intermarried Korean men for more than one year before and after their family dissolution. Researcher had in-depth interviews with participants who were selected by purposive sampling from the intermarried Korean men with dissoluted family conditions. Researcher employed the holistic-content approach to analyze the interviewed materials. Mandelbaum(1973)'s conceptual framework-dimensions, turnings, and adaptions-has been taken to present the analyzed contents. The dimensions of men consisted of 'request of continuous money', 'limitation of comprehensible communucation', 'premise terminated marriage: leaving home', 'inassurance of marriage maintenance'. Turnings involved 'abandoned person', 'parents' excessive protection', 'community among themselves', and 'greedy mediator'. Adaptions were observed by 'various feeling card', 'worrying about men's child', 'expecting the future', and 'stopping on foreigner as a partner'. Discussion and suggestion were presented on the basis of these findings: examination of marriage genuineness, Korean men's preparation of marriage, intervention and service for their mental health, supports for their children and strengthen of multicultural family center's function for dissolved family.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. 구차순(2007). 결혼이주여성의 다문화가족 적응에 관한 연구. 한국가족복지학, 20, 319-359.
  2. 김두섭․이명진(2007). 국제결혼부부의 사회인구학작 상이성과 결혼안정성. 한국인구학, 30(3), 33-56.
  3. 김오남(2006). 여성결혼이민자의 부부갈등 및 학대에 관한 연구-사회문화적 요인을 중심으로-. 한국가족복지학, 18, 33-75.
  4. 김정훈(2007). 결혼이민자 남편과 부인의 가계관리 태도비교-전라북도를 중심으로-. 한국생활과학회지, 16(6), 1185-1195.
  5. 김이선․김민정․한건수(2006). 여성결혼이민자의 문화적 갈등경험 및 소통증진을 위한 정책과제. 한국여성개발원 (현 한국여성정책연구원).
  6. 김이선․마경희․선보영․최호림․이소영(2010). 다문화가 족의 해체문제와 정책과제. 여성가족부.
  7. 문경연(2010). '국민의 배우자'를 벗어난 여성들: 한족결혼이주 여성들의 이혼 사례를 중심으로. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  8. 박재규(2007). 농촌지역 국제결혼 이민자여성의 이혼의사에 영향을 미치는 요인분석. 농촌사회, 17(2), 1-20.
  9. 박재홍(1992). 한국사회의 세대문제: 한국사회사 연구. 한국산업사회의 현실과 전망, 38, 257-296.
  10. 설동훈․김윤태․김현미․윤홍식․이혜경․한건수(2005). 국제결혼 이주여성 실태조사 및 보건복지지원 정책방안. 보건복지부.
  11. 장온정(2007). 국제결혼한 한국남성의 결혼적응에 관한 연구. 중앙대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  12. 정기선․김영혜․박경은․이은아․박지혜․이승애․이지혜 (2007). 경기도내 국제결혼이민자가족 실태조사 및 정책적 지원방안 연구. (재)경기도가족여성개발원.
  13. 엄명용(2010). 결혼이민여성의 한국인남편에 대한 생애사연구. 한국가족관계학회지, 14(4), 261-298.
  14. 유태균 역(2001). 사회복지 질적연구방법론. Padgett, D.K. (1998). Qualitative Method in Social Work Research: Challenges and Rewards. 서울: 나남출판.
  15. 채옥희․홍달아기(2007). 베트남 결혼이민자의 한국생활적응 사례연구. 한국생활과학회지, 16(1), 61-73.
  16. 채옥희․홍달아기(2008). 피해사례를 통해 본 결혼이민자남편의 갈등. 한국생활과학회지, 17(5), 891-902.
  17. 최금해(2007). 조선족여성들의 한국결혼생활 적응유형에 관한 질적 연구. 여성연구, 72(1), 143-188.
  18. 최연실․이순형․문무경(2008). 농촌 거주 결혼이민여성의 발달과 적응. 인간발달연구, 15(3), 225-248.
  19. 통계청(2010). 2009년 이혼통계.
  20. 한경혜(2004). 생애사연구를 통한 노년기 삶의 이해. 한국노년학, 24(4), 87-105.
  21. 한국가정법률상담소(2009). http://www.lawhome.or.kr/
  22. Bahr, H. M.(1981). Religious intermarriage and divorce in Utah and the Mountain States. Journal for the Scientific study of Religion, 20(3), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385547
  23. Blumel, S. R.(1992). Explaining marital success and failure. In S. L. Bahr (Ed.), Family research: A review from 1900 to 1990 (pp. 1-114). N.Y.: Lexington Books.
  24. Fu, X. (2000). Inter-racial marriage and status exchange: A study of Pacific Islanders in Hawaii from 1983 to 1994. Pacific Studies, 22(1), 51-75.
  25. Fu, X., Tora, J., & Kendall, H.(2001). Marital happiness and inter-racial marriage: A study in a multiethnic community in Hawaii. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32, 47-60.
  26. Fu, X.(2006). Impact of socioeconomic status on interracial mate selection and divorce. The Social Science Journal, 43, 239-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2006.02.004
  27. Goodman, K. L.(1991). Racial and religious intermarriage. Research Information Division, LDS Church. Unpublished Work.
  28. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S.(1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  29. Heaton, T. B.(1984). Religious homogamy and marital satisfaction reconsiderded. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 729-733.
  30. Liebich, A. Truval-Mashiach, R. & Zilber, T.(1998). Narrative Research: Reading analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  31. Mendelbaum, G.(1973). The study of life history: Gandhi. Current Anthropology, 14(3), 177-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/201318
  32. Patton, Q.(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Sage Publications.
  33. Preston, S. H.(1997). Comment on Steven Ruggless. The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880-1990. Demography, 34(4), 473-474. https://doi.org/10.2307/3038302
  34. Rustin, M. & Chamberlayne, P.(2002). Introduction from biography to social policy In Chamberlayne, Rustin and Wengraf eds. Biolography and social exclusion in Europe: Experiences and life journeys. The Policy Press.
  35. Shehan, C. L. Bock, E. W., & Lee, G. R.(1990). Religious heterogamy, religiosity, and marital happiness: The case of catholics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/352839
  36. White, L. K. (1990). Determinants of divorce: A review of research in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 904-912. https://doi.org/10.2307/353309