Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth Characteristics of Cutting Culms Sectioned at Different Positions from Three Reed Populations

세 갈대 개체군의 절단 부위별 삽목 생장 특성

  • Hong, Mun-Gi (Dept. of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae Geun (Dept. of Biology Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2011.11.24
  • Accepted : 2012.02.20
  • Published : 2012.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Culm cutting is very effective and convenient method for asexual propagation and even much less destructive than the other ways such as excavation of rhizomes. Despite that culm cutting is such a useful method, only few investigations for raising its efficiency have been carried out. We tried to examine the effect of different geographical populations and cutting sections on the shoot emergence, biomass production and its allocation in terms of cutting efficiency. Culms were sampled from three environmentally distinct wetlands : riparian marsh, salt marsh and montane fen and then they were cut separately into four sections from the bottom to the top part. Both factors of different population and section affected the shoot emergence together. Middle parts on the culm always showed more shoot emergence irrespective of different population. On the other hand, first section from salt marsh and fourth section from the montane fen did not exhibit any shoot emergence. Significant difference in increase of shoot emergence between different sections during investigation period was confirmed only from salt marsh population. Not only different population but also appropriate cutting section should be considered together for better efficiency in cutting of reed culms.

Keywords

References

  1. 김구연.박희순.주기재. 2007. 낙동강하구 갈대군락의 성장에서 지상부제거에 따른 영향. 한국환경생태학회 학술대회논문집 pp.62-68.
  2. 노희명.최우정.이은주.윤석인.최영대. 2002. 시화지구 인공습지에서 갈대에 의한 질소 및 인 흡수. 한국생태학회지 25(5) : 359-364.
  3. 문형태.남궁정.김정희. 1999. 대형수생식물의 물질생산과 질소와 인의 흡수량. 환경생물학회지 17(1) : 27-34.
  4. 심우섭.한인섭. 1998. 울산지역에서 자생하는 갈대, 부들, 갈풀을 이용한 reed-bed의 생활하수 정화능력 연구. 한국환경과학회지 7(2) : 117-121.
  5. 양홍모. 2004. 갈대 및 부들 습지셀의 연못시스템 방류수 질소제거 비교. 한국환경농학회지 23(4) : 234-239.
  6. 오경환.임병선. 1983. 섬진강 하구 염습지 갈대군락의 생산성과 토양양분의 계절적 변화. 한국생태학회지 6(2) : 90-97.
  7. 이호준.양효식. 1993. 생육지의 토양염분농도에 대한 갈대(Phragmites commnis Trin.)개체군의 적응. 한국생태학회지 16(1) : 63-74.
  8. 이효혜미.권오병.석정현.조강현. 2001. 인공식물섬에 적합한 식물의 선발-4종 정수식물의 식생구조와 생장의 비교. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 4(1) : 87-96.
  9. 이효혜미.권오병. 2002. 갈대 줄기의 마디부 발근을 이용한 뗏장 식물섬 개발. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 5(1) : 59-65.
  10. 정경진.김미경.안원용. 2003. 하천합류부에서 갈대매트를 이용한 하천식생대 조성에 대한 기초적 연구. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 6(4) : 62-73.
  11. 정대영.심상렬. 1998. 호안자연식생 복원을 위한 갈대류(Phragmites spp.) 뗏장 개발-토양의 조성 및 파종량이 달뿌리풀(Phragmites japonica) 뗏장 형성에 미치는 영향. 한국조경학회지 26(1) : 28-35.
  12. 정대영.심상렬. 1999. 갈대속 (Phragmites spp.) 식물의 식생공법 개발에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 27(2) : 51-57.
  13. 정연숙.오현경.노찬호.황길순. 1999. 습지식물의 지상부 제거가 생산력과 영양염류 제거량에 미치는 효과. 한국환경생물학회지 17(4) : 459-465.
  14. 주용규. 1998. 간석지에서의 갈대 시공법에 관한 연구. 한국전통조경학회지 16(3) : 35-40.
  15. 홍문기.김재근. 2011. 유전 형질, 환경 인자, 식재 방법 차이에 따른 갈대 지상경 삽목 효율 비교 분석. 한국습지학회지 13(3) : 603-611.
  16. 황인택.최정섭.이회재.홍경식.조광연. 1996. 갈대(Reed, Phragmites communis Trin.)의 방제를 위한 제초제 스크리닝방법의 확립 I. 갈대의 육묘. 한국잡초학회지 16(1) : 21-27.
  17. Calheiros, C., A. Rangel and P. Castro. 2007. Constructed wetland systems vegetated with different plants applied to the treatment of tannery wastewater. Water Res. 41(8) : 1790-1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.012
  18. Clevering, O. A., H. Brix and J. Lukavska. 2001. Geographic variation in growth responses in Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 69(2-4) : 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00132-2
  19. Cui, S., W. Wang and C. Zhang. 2002. Plant regeneration from callus cultures in two ecotypes of reed (Phragmites communis Trinius). In Vitro Cell. Dev. -Pl. 38(4) : 325-329. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2002296
  20. Eaggers, S. E., and D. M. Reed. 1997. Wetland plants and plant communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, St. Paul, MN, p.263.
  21. Gleason, H. A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of the Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, p.810.
  22. Gottschall, N., C. Boutin, A. Crolla, C. Kinsley and P. Champagne. 2007. The role of plants in the removal of nutrients at a constructed wetland treating agricultural (dairy) waste- water, Ontario, Canada. Ecol. Eng. 29(2) : 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.06.004
  23. Gross, M. F., M. A. Hardisky, P. L. Wolf and V. Klemas. 1991. Relationship between above- ground and belowground biomass of Spartina alterniflora (Smooth Cordgrass). Estuar. Coasts 14(2) : 180-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351692
  24. Haslam, S. M. 1970. The performance of Phragmites communis Trin., in relation to water supply. Ann. Bot. 34(4) : 867-877.
  25. Haslam, S. M. 1972. Biological flora of British Isles : Phragmites communis. J. Ecol. 60(2) : 585-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258363
  26. Mal, T. K., and L. Narine. 2004. The biology of Canadian weeds. 129. Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84(1) : 365-396. https://doi.org/10.4141/P01-172
  27. Marks, M., B. Lapin and J. Randall. 1994. Phragmites australis (P. communis) : threat, management and monitoring. Nat. Areas J. 14(4) : 285-294.
  28. Meyerson, L. A., K. Saltonstall, L. Windham, E. Kiviat and S. Findlay. 2000. A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 8(2-3) : 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008432200133
  29. Rejmankova, E. 2011. The role of macrophytes in wetland ecosystems. J Ecol. Field Biol. 34(4) : 333-345. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.044
  30. Tanner, C. C. 1996. Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems-A comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species. Ecol. Eng. 7(1) : 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8574(95)00066-6
  31. Tscharntke, T. 1992. Fragmentation of Phragmites habitats, minimum viable population size, hab- itat suitability, and local extinction of moths, midges, flies, aphids, and birds. Conserv. Biol. 6(4) : 530-536. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040530.x
  32. Tscharntke, T. 1999. Insects on common reed (Phragmites australis) : community structure and the impact of herbivory on shoot growth. Aquat. Bot. 64(3-4) : 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00066-2
  33. Whigham, D. F., and R. L. Simpson. 1978. The relationship between belowground biomass of freshwater tidal wetland macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 5 : 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(78)90076-1
  34. Zhao, L., F. Zhang, J. Guo, Y. Yang, B. Li and L. Zhang. 2004. Nitric oxide functions as a signal in salt resistance in the calluses from two ecotypes of reed. Plant Physiol. 134(2) : 849-857. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.030023

Cited by

  1. A Case Report on the Constructed Wetland for the Growth of Sphagnum palustre vol.16, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.6.093
  2. in riparian wetlands pp.15351459, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3350