DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Empirical Analyses of Physical Exclusiveness of Multi-family Housing Estates in Seoul and Its Socioeconomic Effects

아파트단지의 물리적 폐쇄성과 사회경제적 효과에 관한 실증분석

  • Received : 2012.08.24
  • Accepted : 2012.09.27
  • Published : 2012.10.25

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the degree of physical exclusiveness of multi-family housing estates and its socioeconomic effects. By combining various physical elements devised to blockade and control the entrance to the estate as well as housing units, it constructs the index to quantify the degree of physical exclusiveness for the multi-family housing estates of more than 300 households in Seoul. The statistics reveal that the degree of physical exclusiveness has increased over time and therefore, as a representative example, two-thirds of the estates are now equipped with barricade at the entrance, which often symbolizes 'gated community'. The estimation result of hedonic price model show that physical exclusiveness has a significant positive effect on housing price. The household survey data for the case study estates also demonstrate that the residents in the estate of higher degree of physical exclusiveness put a higher housing value on socioeconomic 'prestige' as well as 'community', beyond physical 'security', and have closer neighborhood relationship with the residents inside the estate. However, there is no significant difference in neighborhood relationship with the outside residents depending upon the degree of physical exclusiveness.

Keywords

References

  1. 권오혁.윤완섭 (1991). 서울시 아파트의 공간적 확산과 주거지 분화. 사회와 역사, 29, 94-132.
  2. 대한주택공사 (2002). 주택도시40년. 성남: 대한주택공사.
  3. 도경선 (1994). 서울시의 사회계층별 거주지 분화에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 지리학과, 지리학논총, 23, 23-48.
  4. 하정순 (2004). 주거가치유형에 따른 아파트 구매의사결정과정 및 구매행동에 관한 연구. 대구카톨릭대학교 박사학위논문, 대구.
  5. Bible, D., & Hsieh, C. (2001). Gated communities and residential property values. Appraisal Journal, 69(2), 140- 145.
  6. Blakery, E., & Snyder, M. (1999). Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  7. Cho, J., & Kim, S. (2005). A study on the hedonic price of mixed-use housing. Journal of Korean Planners Association, 40(3), 79-90.
  8. Choi, E. (2004). The differentiation of reproductions of educational capitals and the formation of the gated city. Journal of Korean Geographical Society, 39(3), 374-390.
  9. Cutler, V. (1947). Personal and family values in the choice of a home. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 849.
  10. Eun, N. (2004). Revaluation of the modernization in the Korean housing culture since 1980s. Journal of Korean Management Association, 22(5), 59-73.
  11. Gelezeau, V. (2008). Changing socio-economic environments, housing culture and new urban segregation in Seoul. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(2), 295-321. https://doi.org/10.1163/156805808X372458
  12. Jang, J. (2010). A study on the premium housing residents' preferential factors of dwelling sites. unpublished master's thesis, Dankook University, Seoul.
  13. Jin, M., Lee, Y., & Kim, H. (2001). A survey on the sense of neighborhood and social interaction of apartments' resident. Architectural Institute of Korea, 17(2), 75-82.
  14. Jung, J. (2006). Accumulative process of social capital at the upper class' apartment complex in a Korean metropolitan city. unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul.
  15. Kim, C. (2002). A study on the characteristics and the factors of residential distribution patterns of power elites in Seoul. Journal of Korean Planners Association, 37(5), 65- 85.
  16. Kim, K. (2007). The causes and factors generating gentrification in Seoul. Journal of Korean Urban Geographical Society, 10(1), 37-49.
  17. Kim, S. (2007). Architectural characteristics and residents' perceived and actual safety in gated communities. Architectural Institute of Korea, 23(6), 61-70.
  18. LaCour-Little, M., & Malpezzi, S. (2001). Gated communities and property values. http://www.scribd.com/scottschaefer/d/8414515-Gated-Communities-and-Property-Values.
  19. Le Goix, R. (2005). The impact of gated communities on property values: evidence of changes in real estate markets-Los Angeles. 1980-2000. http://www.cybergeo.eu/index6225.html, article 375.
  20. Lee, S., & Shin, Y. (2001). The effect of reconstruction probability on apartment price. Journal of Korean Planners Association, 36(5), 101-110.
  21. Lee, S., Cho, Y., & Lim, N. (2004). A marketing strategy for brandapartment of construction companies. Journal of Korea Institute of Building Construction, 4(3), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2004.4.3.153
  22. Lim, S., Lee, C., & Jun, H. (2003). Restoration of local community based on apartment residential space. Journal of Korean Association of Regional Geography, 9(3), 314- 328.
  23. Low, S. (2003). Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.
  24. Nam, Y. (2006). The formation and classification of gated communities. Journal of Korean Urban Geographical Society, 9(1), 81-90.
  25. Song, S. (2009). Socioeconomic polarization and dwelling places in Korean society. Journal of Far East Social Welfare, 5, 59-79.

Cited by

  1. Re-examination of Criticism on the "Uniformity" of Korean Apartments vol.26, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.6.061
  2. Causes and Spatial Characteristics of Neighborhood Relations by Family Life Cycle vol.27, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2016.27.1.001
  3. A Study on Practical Application of “Special Building Zone” for Improvement of Landscape of Housing Complex : Focused on the Redevelopments Project of Sinbanpo Apartment Complex vol.28, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2017.28.3.045
  4. Spatial Homophily of Commercial Areas: The Case of Seoul vol.9, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061012