DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Establishment of Pre-Harvest Residue Limit (PHRL) of Emamectin benzoate during Cultivation of Amaranth

생산단계 비름 중 Emamectin benzoate의 잔류허용기준 설정

  • Kim, Kyung Jin (Division of Biological Environment, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Da Som (Division of Biological Environment, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong Jin (Environment Friendly Agricultural Products Safety Center) ;
  • Ham, Hun Ju (Environment Friendly Agricultural Products Safety Center) ;
  • Hur, Jang Hyun (Division of Biological Environment, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 김경진 (강원대학교 농업생명과학대학 바이오자원환경학과) ;
  • 김다솜 (강원대학교 농업생명과학대학 바이오자원환경학과) ;
  • 허성진 (친환경농산물안전성센터) ;
  • 함헌주 (친환경농산물안전성센터) ;
  • 허장현 (강원대학교 농업생명과학대학 바이오자원환경학과)
  • Received : 2013.04.08
  • Accepted : 2013.06.03
  • Published : 2013.08.30

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate pre-harvest residue limit (PHRL) in amaranth, to estimate biological half-life of emamectin benzoate and identify the characteristics of the residue. Pesticides of standard and double appplication rate, were sprayed once on amaranth at 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 days before harvest. Amaranth sample was extracted with acetonitrile and partitioned with dichloromethane, and pesticide residues were determined with LC/MS/MS. The limit of detection of emamectin benzoate was 0.01 mg/kg. Recoveries of emamectin benzoate ($B_{1a}$, $B_{1b}$) at two fortification levels of 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg, $B_{1a}$ were $93.3{\pm}0.7%$ and $93.2{\pm}7.7%$, $B_{1b}$ were $106.6{\pm}1.9%$ and $80.5{\pm}6.6%$, respectively. The biological half-lives of emamectin benzoate were about 2.0 days at standard application rate and 1.7 days at double application rate, respectively. The PHRL of emamectin benzoate were recommended as 0.84 mg/kg for 10 days before harvest.

본 연구는 소면적 재배 작물인 비름에 대한 emamectin benzoate의 수확 전 최종 농약 살포일로부터 수확일까지 농약 잔류량 감소추이를 파악하여, 생산단계 농산물의 농약 잔류 특성과 수확 예정일의 잔류량 예측을 위하여 수행되었다. 비름 재배 중 emamectin benzoate를 안전사용기준의 희석배수에 준하여 1회 및 7일 간격으로 2회 살포한 후, 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14일 총 8회의 시료를 채취하여, 약제의 잔류양상을 분석한 뒤 생물학적 반감기를 산출하였다. 비름 중 emamectin benzoate는 acetonitrile로 추출하고 dichloromethane을 사용하여 분배하였으며, SPE kit (PSA, GCB, $MgSO_4$)로 정제한 후 LC-ESI/MS/MS로 분석하였다. 시험농약의 정량한계(LOQ)는 0.01 mg/kg이었고, 정량한계의 10배와 50배 수준으로 농약을 처리하여 수행한 결과 emamectin benzoate의 평균 회수율은 $B_{1a}$에 대해서 각각 $93.3{\pm}0.7%$$93.2{\pm}7.7%$였고, Blb에 대해서 각각 $106.6{\pm}1.9%$$80.5{\pm}6.6%$의 회수율을 보였다. 비름 중 emamectin benzoate의 생물학적 반감기는 1회 및 2회 처리구에서 각각 2.0일, 1.7일이었으며, 시험농약의 잔류량을 바탕으로 생산단계 잔류허용기준을 추천한 결과 수확 10일 전에 0.84 mg/kg 이하이면, 수확 시에는 잔류농도가 MRL (0.05 mg/kg, 시금치(유사농산물 기준)) 수준 이하로 잔류할 것으로 예측되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hong, J. H., J. S. Lim, C. R. Lee, K. T. Han, Y. R. Lee and K. S. Lee (2011) Study of Pesticide Residue Allowed Standard of Methoxifenozide and Novaluron on Aster scaber During Cultivation Stage. Korean J. Pesttic. Sci. 15(1):8-14.
  2. Hwang, K. W., T. W. Kim, J. H. Yoo, B. S. Park and J. K. Moon (2012) Dissipation Pattern of Amisulbrom in Cucumber under Greenhouse Condition for Establishing Pre-harvest Residue Limit. Korean J. Pesttic. Sci. 16(4): 288-293. https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2012.16.4.288
  3. KCPA (2012) Agrochemicals Use Guide Book. pp.596-598.
  4. KFDA (2012) MRLs for Pesticides in Foods.
  5. Lee, Y. J., K. Y. Kwang, D. J. Won, G. H. Gil and K. S. Lee (2003) Residue Patterns of Procymidone, Chlorpyrifos and Cypermethrin in Peaches During Cultivation and Storage Period. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 22(3): 200-226. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2003.22.3.220
  6. Lee, J. H., H. W. Park, Y. S. Keum, C. H. Kwon, Y. D. Lee and J. H. Kim (2008) Dissipation Pattern of Boscalid in Cucumber under Greenhouse Condition. Korean J. Pesttic. Sci. 12(1):67-73.
  7. Lim, J. S., J. H. Hong, C. R. Lee, K. T. Han, Y. R. Lee and K. S. Lee (2011) Establishment of Pre-Harvest Residue Limit (PHRL) of Insecticide Chlorfenapyr and Fungiside Fenarimol During Cultivation on Chwinamul (Aster scaber). Korean J. Environ. Agric. 30(1):52-59. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2011.30.1.52
  8. Liu S., Zhang F., Qang L. and Pan C. (2012) dissipation and residues of emamectin benzoate in cabbage. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 89(3):654-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0729-1
  9. RDA and KCPA (2012) 2012 Guideline of test for pesticide registration.
  10. Wang L., Zhao P., Zhang F., Li Y., Du F., and Pan C. (2012) Dissipation and residue behavior of emamectin benzoate on apple and cabbage field application. Ecotoxicol. Environ. 78:260-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.11.031

Cited by

  1. Residual Patterns of Acaricides, Etoxazole and Flufenoxuron in Apples vol.18, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2014.18.2.61
  2. Assessment of Pre-Harvest Environmental Factors in Domestic Production of Organic Lettuce vol.18, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2014.18.2.88
  3. Dissipation of Carbendazim and Tetraconazole Residues in Water Melon Under Green House Condition vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2018.22.3.199
  4. 참외(Cucumis melon var. makuwa)에 대한 Buprofezin 및 Penthiopyrad의 생산단계 잔류허용기준 설정 vol.18, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2014.18.3.123
  5. 소면적 재배 작물 들깻잎 중 살충제 Bifenthrin과 Chlorfenapyr의 잔류양상 vol.34, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2015.34.3.29
  6. 시설 내 오이(Cucumis sativus L.) Penthiopyrad 재배 중 및 Pyriofenone의 잔류특성과 생산단계 잔류허용기준 설정 vol.36, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2017.36.1.07
  7. 생산단계 잔류허용기준 설정을 위한 딸기 중 bistrifluron과 chlorantraniliprole의 잔류 특성 연구 vol.36, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2017.36.1.09
  8. Residual Characteristics of Etofenprox, Pyrifluquinazon, Spirotetramat and Sulfoxaflor in Cow Parsnip (Heracleum moellendorffii L.) of Minor Crop vol.23, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2019.23.2.61
  9. Establishment of Pre-Harvest Residue Limit (PHRL) of Buprofezin and Pyridaben in Squash vol.23, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2019.23.3.154
  10. 들깻잎에서 Triazole계 살균제의 생물학적 반감기와 물리화학적 특성과의 상관관계 vol.62, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2019.056