Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회논문집)

Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fragility Assessment of Agricultural Facilities Subjected to Volcanic Ash Fall Hazards

농업시설물에 대한 화산재 취약도 평가

  • Ham, Hee Jung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kangwon National Univ.) ;
  • Choi, Seung Hun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kangwon National Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Sungsu (School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Ho-Jeong (Department of Architecture, Dankook Univ.)
  • Received : 2014.11.14
  • Accepted : 2014.11.21
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents findings from the assessment of the volcanic ash fragility for multi-hazard resisting vinyl greenhouse and livestock shed among the agricultural facilities. The volcanic ash fragility was evaluated by using a combination of the FOSM (first-order second-moment) method, available statistics of volcanic load, facility specifications, and building code. In this study, the evaluated volcanic ash fragilities represent the conditional probability of failure of the agricultural facilities over the full range of volcanic ash loads. For the evaluation, 6 types(ie., 2 single span, 2 tree crop, and 2 double span types) of multi-hazard resisting vinyl greenhouses and 3 types(ie., standard, coast, and mountain types) of livestock sheds are considered. All volcanic ash fragilities estimated in this study were fitted by using parameters of the GEV(generalized extreme value) distribution function, and the obtained parameters were complied into a database to be used in future. The volcanic ash fragilities obtained in this study are planning to be used to evaluate risk by volcanic ash when Mt. Baekdu erupts.

본 연구에서는 농업시설물 중 내재해형 비닐하우스와 축사에 대한 화산재 취약도를 평가하였다. 이들 농업시설물에 대한 화산재 취약도를 평가하기 위해 화산재 하중의 확률밀도함수와 대상 시설물 저항성능의 확률밀도함수를 비교하는 해석적 접근법 기반의 FOSM(first-order second-moment) 방법이 이용되었다. 화산재 취약도 평가를 위하여 폭과 높이 그리고 단면 및 재료적 특성이 상이한 6종의 내재해형 비닐하우스와 표준형, 해안형, 산간형으로 구분된 3종의 축사가 사용되었다. 또한 FOSM 방법으로 평가된 내재해형 비닐하우스와 축사의 취약도는 GEV(generalized extreme value) 분포함수의 모수 형태로 최적화된 후 데이터베이스화되었다. 본 연구에서 평가한 화산재 취약도는 백두산 화산분화에 따른 화산재 퇴적에 대한 농업시설물의 위험도 평가를 위하여 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Architectural Institute of Korea (2009) Korean Building Code-Structural, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, p.772.
  2. Baker, J.W. (2014) Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting using Dynamic Structural Analysis, Earthquake Spectra, p.24, In press.
  3. Barnard, S.T. (2010) The Vulnerability of New Zealand Lifelines Infrastructure to Ashfall, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury, p.286.
  4. Ekelen, A.J. (1997) Review and Selection Methods for Structural Reliability Analysis, Delft University Press, p.44.
  5. FEMA (2010) Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Hurricane Model, Technical Manual, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C. p.552.
  6. Ham, H.J., Yun, W.S., Kim, H.J., Lee, S.S. (2014) Evaluation of Extreme Wind Fragility for Balcony Windows Installed in Mid/Low-Rise Apartments, J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig., 14(1), pp.19-26. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.1.19
  7. Iguchi, M., Ishihara, K., Surono, Hendrasto, M. (2011) Learn from 2010 Eruptions at Merapi and Sinabung Volcanoes in Indonesia, Disaster Prevention Research Institute Kyoto University, No. 54B, pp.186-194.
  8. Johnston, D. (1997) Physical and Social Impacts of Past and Future Volcanic Eruptions in New Zealand, Ph.D. Dissertation, Massey University, p.288.
  9. Kim, S.W., Choi, E.K., Jung, S.J., Kim, S.H., Lee, K.H., Yun, S.H. (2013) A Preliminary Study for Predicting a Damage Range of Pyroclastic Flows, Lahars, and Volcanic Flood caused by Mt. Baekdusan Eruption, Korean Earth Sci. Soc., 34(6), pp.479-491. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2013.34.6.479
  10. Kottegoda, N.T., Rosso, R. (1997) Statistics, Probability, and Reliability for Civil and Environmental engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, p.735.
  11. Lee, J.H., Shin, H.M., Son, S.Y. (1988) Partial Safety Factors by SOSM/RC Combined Method, J. Comput. Struct. Eng. Inst. Korea, 1(1), pp.79-85.
  12. MIFAFF (2005) Agroforestry Major Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, p.493.
  13. MIFAFF (2008) Standard Design of the Livestock Shed, National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, p.232.
  14. MIFAFF (2010) Standard Plans and Specifications of Horticultural & Herbal Facilities, Rural Development Administration, p.478.
  15. NEMA (2009) Development of the Assessment Technique to Wind and Snowfall Hazard. Natural Hazard Mitigation Research Group, National Emergency Management Agency, p.279.
  16. Nimlos, T.J., Hans, Z. (1982) The Distribution and Thickness of Volcanic Ash in Montana, Northwest Sci., 56(3), pp.190-198.
  17. Schultz, M.T., Gouldby, B.P., Simm, J.D., Wibowo, J.L. (2010) Beyond the Factor of Safety: Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability, US Army Corps of Engineers. p.62.